scholarly journals The engagement of young people in their own advance care planning process: A systematic narrative synthesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1147-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Hughes ◽  
Mary R O’Brien ◽  
Anita Flynn ◽  
Katherine Knighting
2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Schickedanz ◽  
Dean Schillinger ◽  
C. Seth Landefeld ◽  
Sara J. Knight ◽  
Brie A. Williams ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-447
Author(s):  
Laura García-Garcés ◽  
Vicente Bellver Capella

If healthcare professionals wish to provide healthcare that protects patients’ values and preferences, it is necessary to find a way to systematically implement the Advance-Care Planning process. The purpose of this article is to review the literature and present a theoretical model of Advance-Care Planning implementation through the Nursing Process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. e44-e51
Author(s):  
Cameron Kiersch ◽  
Teddie Potter

The complexities surrounding the dying process may distort rational decision-making and impact care at the end of life. Advance care planning, which focuses on identifying the individual's definition of quality of life, holds great potential to provide clarity at the end of life. Currently, young adults are not the intended audience for advance care planning. A quality improvement project engaged 36 college-age adults in structured group advance care planning discussions and evaluated the perceived value of a self-recorded advance directive. Findings from a pre- and postintervention survey suggested that young adults welcomed a conversation about end-of-life care; they wished for more information and expressed that a video-recorded advance directive stimulated thoughts about their own definition of quality of life. Participants' improved self-perception of comfort, confidence, certainty, and knowledge regarding the advance care planning process and end-of-life care indicated young adults may be a willing and eager population for the expansion of advance care planning. In addition to directing advance care planning to a younger audience, a personal video-recorded advance directive may complement the current advance care planning process and aid individuals in defining their quality of life.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 721-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin R. Baughman ◽  
Julie Aultman ◽  
Susan Hazelett ◽  
Barbara Palmisano ◽  
Anne O'Neill ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Toccafondi ◽  
Giuseppina Simone ◽  
Marco Lombardi ◽  
Pietro Claudio Dattolo

Abstract Background and Aims Advance care planning (ACP) enables competent patients to define goals and preferences for future treatments and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with relatives, and if appropriate to record these preferences. After many years of political and social debates, in December 2017 the first advance directive and care planning legislation was approved in Italy. Nevertheless, citizens’ awareness of these issues is scarce as well as the integration of the advance care planning process into clinical routine. The latest data reported to the Italian Parliament by the Ministry of Health indicated that advance directives have been completed by 62030 people, approximately 1.1% of Italian adult population. However, during the last months, the COVID-19 pandemic solicited taking steps towards promoting an advance care planning culture. Indeed, the need of proposing ACP to patients have been recently stressed both by medical associations and national and local institutional documents. Method Since November 2020, our nephrology unit adopted a protocol approved by Ethical committee by Physician Order of Florence, aimed to conduct ACP interventions with dialysis patients. Firstly, all patients were informed about the possibility to taking part in one or more advance care planning conversations with their nephrologist. Secondly, a semi-structured guide to the conversation was created in order to support physicians in conducting the ACP intervention. Finally, patients along with nephrologist and their relatives, could documented their preferences for future treatments and care. Results From November to March only one patient asked to receive an ACP intervention. However, since COVID-19 spread in Italy last March, the number of patients who demanded ACP raised up. In the period from April to July, 15 out of 110 hemodialysis patients treated in our center asked for an ACP intervention and filled-in an advance directive. Specifically, no patients required an immediate discontinuation of dialysis, nevertheless 80% of them stated that would not like to continue with dialysis in case he/she was no longer able to self-determine (e.g. permanent loss of capacity to communicate with others). All patients except one have appointed a personal representative (usually their partner). In the eventuality of cardiac arrest, 60% of patients asked for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Finally, all patients expressed the wish to spend the last days of life at home. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic raised up the number of dialysis patients who required to taking part in a advance care planning intervention. In this sense, the pandemic can be an opportunity for consolidate advance care planning in Italy as well as in other countries, where these interventions are not well known by people and not yet regularly offered in the clinical routine. Using a semi-structured interview for the ACP interview can help the nephrologist to discuss future care and end-of-life topics with their patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document