scholarly journals Development and Experimental Validation of an Underwater Manipulator Hydrodynamic Model

1998 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 748-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy W. McLain ◽  
Stephen M. Rock
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Khanicheh ◽  
A. Tehranian ◽  
A. Meghdari ◽  
M. S. Sadeghipour

Abstract This paper presents the kinematics and dynamic modeling of a three-link (3-DOF) underwater manipulator where the effects of hydrodynamic forces are investigated. In our investigation, drag and added mass coefficients are not considered as constants. In contrast, the drag coefficient is a variable with respect to all relative parameters. Experiments were conducted to validate the hydrodynamic model for a one degree-of-freedom manipulator up to a three degrees-of-freedom manipulator. Finally, the numerical and experimental results are compared and thoroughly discussed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (04) ◽  
pp. 289-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Simos ◽  
E. A. Tannuri ◽  
C. P. Pesce ◽  
J. A. P. Aranha

In an earlier work Leite et al (1998) developed a heuristic hydrodynamic model, based on the shrtwing theory, for the horizontal current forces on an FPSO system. The proposed model was quasi-explicit in the sense that it depends on the ship's main dimensions and on only three hydrodynamic coefficients, namely, the friction coefficient Cf for head on incidence, the drag coefficient CY for a cross-flow, and the related yaw moment coefficient lCY. As discussed in Leite et al (1998), these coefficients could even be estimated from the ITTC friction curve and from Hoerner's sectional results, which would then turn the hydrodynamic model explicit. The model has been tested against experimental results for the horizontal force coefficients, obtained both at IPT and at the Marin wave tank, and it has also been confronted with bifurcation experiments for a turret configuration realized at IPT. The agreement rendered good results in all cases tested. The heuristic approach has now been extended to incorporate the yaw velocity terms while preserving the quasi-explicit feature of the original model. The main purpose of the work herein is to present such a development together with some experimental validation. Using Froude scaling of different ships in distinct ballast conditions, the horizontal forces and moment in the yaw rotating tests were measured at IPT and at Marin and compared with those predicted by the heuristic model, the observed agreement again being fair enough. In an accompanying paper in this issue, the derived mathematical model is tested against experiments that emulate a single-point mooring of a tanker ship in order to disclose the model's ability to cope with the main dynamic features of the fishtailing instability problem.


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (04) ◽  
pp. 302-314
Author(s):  
E. A. Tannuri ◽  
A. N. Simos ◽  
A. J. P. Leite ◽  
J. A. P. Aranha

The extended hydrodynamic model derived in Simos et al (2001), where the yaw velocity terms have been incorporated to the model proposed by Leite et al (1998) while preserving its quasi-explicit feature, is used here to study some typical dynamic problems of moored ships, specifically the fishtailing shtailing instability that may occur in a single-point mooring (SPM) system. Since the intention was to check the hydrodynamic model, the hawser was assumed rigid to avoid the complex dynamics that may occur when the actual hawser slackens and the obtained results were confronted with experimental ones, obtained at the IPT wave tank. The agreement is very good in the sense that not only the limit-cycle amplitudes are compatible but also the time series are very similar. For the VLCC model in ballasted condition (40%) the fishtailing shtailing instability occurs only for a relatively high current velocity and some Froude effect is then detectable. Using results from the static bifurcation experiment an ad hoc correction is proposed for such effect, showing a relatively close agreement between experiments and the theoretical model. This Froude effect correction is, however, not relevant for an actual SPM system subjected to a usual ocean current.


2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Spomer ◽  
CGW Gertzen ◽  
D Häussinger ◽  
H Gohlke ◽  
V Keitel

2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (8) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Shirasaki ◽  
Naotaka Okada ◽  
Kenichiro Sano ◽  
Hideki Iwatsuki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document