Ultrasonographic characteristics of medullary thyroid carcinoma according to nodule size: application of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and American Thyroid Association guidelines

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512092969
Author(s):  
Soo Yeon Hahn ◽  
Jung Hee Shin ◽  
Young Lyun Oh ◽  
Ko Woon Park

Background Few studies have categorized ultrasound (US) findings of various sized medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTCs) according to updated guidelines. Purpose To evaluate and compare the differences in US findings of MTC according to nodule size, using the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. Material and Methods The study included 119 patients with 129 MTC nodules, which were surgically confirmed at our institution between March 1999 and September 2017. Nodules were divided into large (≥1.0 cm) and small (<1.0 cm) groups. US images were analyzed according to the K-TIRADS and ATA guidelines. The differences in US characteristics between small and large nodules were compared using Fisher’s exact or Chi-square tests. Results Of 129 MTC nodules, 84 (65.1%) were large nodules and 45 (34.9%) were small nodules. According to the nodule size, small MTC nodules were classified more commonly as high suspicion by K-TIRADS and ATA (95.6% and 93.3%, respectively) ( P < 0.001), but presented neither cystic change, isoechogenicity, nor low suspicion category by K-TIRADS and ATA. In contrast, large MTC nodules showed more frequently cystic change (15.5%), isoechogenicity (16.7%), smooth margins (50%), or low or intermediate suspicion US features by K-TIRADS and ATA (59.6% and 36.0%, respectively) (all P values < 0.001). Conclusion Most small MTC nodules are classified as high suspicion on US, whereas large MTC nodules are diagnosed more frequently as low or intermediate suspicion by K-TIRADS and ATA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 3389-3400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialin Zhu ◽  
Xing Li ◽  
Xi Wei ◽  
Xueling Yang ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Jian Ma ◽  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Lanlan Zhang

Objective: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Methods: We performed a computerized search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify eligible articles published before July 31, 2019. We included studies providing head-to-head comparison between ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, with fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology results or pathology results as the reference standard. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling. We also performed multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: Twelve original articles with 13,000 patients were included, involving a total of 14,867 thyroid nodules. The pooled sensitivity of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95), with specificity of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29–0.63), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two classification criteria in terms of both sensitivity ( P = .26) and specificity ( P = .05). For five studies providing direct comparison of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, and Korean TI-RADS, our analyses showed that the Korean TI-RADS yielded the highest sensitivity (0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94), but at the cost of a significant decline in specificity (0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.30). Conclusion: Both classification criteria demonstrated favorable sensitivity and moderate specificity in the stratification of thyroid nodules. However, use of ACR TI-RADS could avoid a large number of biopsies at the cost of only a slight decrease in sensitivity. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; HSROC = hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic; SROC = summary receiver operating characteristic; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasonography


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 908-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ahmadi ◽  
Rebecca Herbst ◽  
Taofik Oyekunle ◽  
Xiaoyin ‘Sara’ Jiang ◽  
Kyle Strickland ◽  
...  

Objective: Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology pose management challenges in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound features in navigating clinical decision making in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound imaging from 186 adult patients with thyroid nodules and indeterminate cytology who underwent thyroidectomy at a quaternary hospital from 2010–2017. All nodules were classified based on the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS). Nodules were included if good quality pre-operative ultrasound imaging and surgical pathology were available. Results: A total of 202 thyroid nodules were included. The median age was 57 years; 82.8% were female. Risk of malignancy (ROM) in resected nodules with Bethesda 3 and 4 cytology was 19.4% and 30.3%, respectively. ATA high-suspicious and TI-RADS 5 nodules had high ROM, 100% in both systems for Bethesda 3 nodules; 66.7% and 50.0%, respectively, for Bethesda 4 nodules. For ATA very-low suspicious/TI-RADS 1 and 2, ROM was 0%. ROM in ATA low-suspicious/TI-RADS 3 nodules with Bethesda 3 cytology was lower (15.2% and 16.0%, respectively) than Bethesda 4 cytology (33.8% and 34.3%, respectively). ATA intermediate-suspicious/TI-RADS 4 nodules with Bethesda 4 cytology had a lower ROM (11.1% and 18.2%, respectively) than Bethesda 3 cytology (28.6 % and 31.6%, respectively). Conclusion: Using either the ATA or the TI-RADS system to risk-stratify nodules with indeterminate cytology may help clinicians plan better for additional diagnostic testing and treatment. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = atypia of undetermined significance; FLUS = follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; PPV = positive predictive value; ROM = risk of malignancy; SFN = suspicious for follicular neoplasm; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 945-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Yang ◽  
Ghaneh Fananapazir ◽  
Jennifer LaRoy ◽  
Machelle Wilson ◽  
Michael J. Campbell

Objective: Management of thyroid nodules with Bethesda category III and IV cytology on fine needle aspiration (FNA) is challenging as they cannot be adequately classified as benign or malignant. Ultrasound (US) patterns have demonstrated the utility in evaluating the risk of malignancy (ROM) of Bethesda category III nodules. This study aims to evaluate the value of 3 well-established US grading systems (American Thyroid Association [ATA], Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [Korean-TIRADS], and The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [ACR-TIRADS]) in determining ROM in Bethesda category IV nodules. Methods: Ninety-two patients with 92 surgically resected thyroid nodules who had Bethesda category IV cytology on FNA were identified. Nodule images were retrospectively graded using the 3 systems in a blinded manner. Associations between US risk category and malignant pathology for each system were analyzed. Results: Of the 92 nodules, 56 (61%) were benign and 36 (39%) were malignant. Forty-seven per cent of ATA high risk nodules, 53% of K-TIRADS category 5 nodules, and 50% of ACR-TIRADS category 5 nodules were malignant. The ATA high-risk category had 25% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 47% positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy. K-TIRADS category 5 had 25% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 53% PPV for malignancy. ACR-TIRADS category 5 had 25% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 50% PPV for malignancy. None of the 3 grading systems yielded a statistically significant correlation between US risk category and the ROM ( P = .30, .72, .28). Conclusion: The ATA, Korean-TIRADS, and ACR-TIRADS classification systems are not helpful in stratifying ROM in patients with Bethesda category IV nodules. Clinicians should be cautious of using ultra-sound alone when deciding between therapeutic options for patients with Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules. Abbreviations: ACR-TIRADS = The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; ATA NSP = American Thyroid Association nodule sonographic patterns and risk of malignancy classification system; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; HCC = Hurthle cell carcinoma; HCN = Hurthle cell neoplasm; K-TIRADS = Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; ROM = risk of malignancy; US = ultrasound


2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-227
Author(s):  
Azin Shayganfar ◽  
Peyman Hashemi ◽  
Mahsa Masjedi Esfahani ◽  
Amir Mohammad Ghanei ◽  
Nooshin Afshar Moghadam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoomeh Raoufi ◽  
Robab Anbiaee ◽  
Zohre Soltani ◽  
Fatemeh Shojaeian ◽  
Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini

Background: Breast and thyroid cancers remain among the most common malignancies in women. In previous studies, the co-occurrence of thyroid and breast cancers has been reported. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk and incidence of incidental thyroid nodules (ITNs) between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls, based on the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS). Methods: This case-control study was conducted on 140 patients with breast cancer and 140 cancer-free women in a similar age range. Thyroid ultrasonography (US) was performed before the onset of treatment. The risk stratification of thyroid nodules was based on the TI-RADS. Results: The mean age of the participants was not significantly different between the case (43.35 ± 7.85 years) and control (42.11 ± 3.69 years) groups (P = 0.094). Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most frequent type of breast cancer in the patients. Normal thyroid US findings were significantly less frequent in patients with breast cancer (35.7%) compared to the healthy controls (76.4%) (P = 0.001). On the other hand, thyroid nodules were more frequent in the patients and associated with a higher risk of malignancy (i.e., high TI-RADS scores) compared to healthy women (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Besides, patients with breast cancer showed more thyroid abnormalities in the US examinations. Conclusions: A higher frequency of ITN, with an elevated TI-RADS score, which raised the suspicion of malignancy, was seen in patients with breast cancer. Overall, patients with breast cancer may benefit from a regular thyroid US examination.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document