A Dosimetrical Analysis of the Magnitude of Isocenter Shifts Using CT-on-Rails Guided Online Adaptive Planning for Left Breast Cancer Patients Treated by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
K Mashhour ◽  
S Eliteo ◽  
W Hashem

Introduction: This study was conducted to check the accuracy and validity of an automated adaptive planning (AAP) method which combines automated re-contouring and re-planning to check for inter-fractional anatomical changes in breast cancer patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on a weekly computed tomography (CT)-on rails images dosimetrically viewing the magnitude of difference in isocenter shifts and the degree of dose deviations regarding target coverage and dose received by organs at risk. Methods and Materials: Twenty left sided conservative breast cancer patients were selected for IMRT treatment. Automatic generation of the contours on each repeat CT image was performed by mapping the contours from the planning CT image using deformable image registration. 3D- CRT and IMRT plans were automatically recalculated for each patient. The magnitude of isocenter shifts in postero-anterior (PA), cranio-caudal (CC) and right-left (RL) directions was calculated and the degree of dose deviations regarding target coverage and dose received by organs at risk. Results: In the PA,CC and RL directions, 9.2%, 11.4% and 6.4% of the 100 CT scans didn’t require any position adjustments. The mean isocenter shifts and standard deviation (SD) were 0.5 & 0.6 +/- 1.1mm, 0.3 &0.4 +/- 0.5mm and 0.2 & 0.4+/- 0.6mm for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans in the PA,CC and RL directions, respectively. 74.1%, 65.1%, and 55.8% required a shift of 1 - 3 mm; 10.5%, 23.9%, and 33.2% required a shift of 3 - 5mm; and 1.5%, 3.3%, and 5.4% required a shift of more than 5 mm, respectively. With respect to target coverage, the D90[Gy] for the breast CTV was 46.2 Gy and 45.6 for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. The mean doses to the heart and left lung were reduced by 5.5 %, 3.7 Gy and 4.1%, 2.6 Gy using the AAP method. Conclusions: The fully automated AAP method using CT on rails for online re-planning was effective in reducing the magnitude of isocenter shifts and compensating for target volume coverage underdosing and higher doses perceived by risk organs caused by anatomical inter-fractional changes in breast cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1108) ◽  
pp. 20190792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Pei Yeh ◽  
Yu-Chuen Huang ◽  
Li-Ying Wang ◽  
Pei-Wei Shueng ◽  
Hui-Ju Tien ◽  
...  

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and optimal restricted angle of the complete-directional-complete block (CDCB) technique in helical tomotherapy (HT) by including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with the internal mammary node (IMN) in left-sided breast cancer. Methods: Ten left-sided breast cancer patients treated with 50 Gy in 25 fractions were compared with five-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) and six types of HT plans. In the HT plans, complete block (CB), organ-based directional block (OBDB) and CDCB with different restricted angles were used. Results: The conformity index (CI) between the CDCB0,10,15,20 and 5F-IMRT groups was similar. Compared to CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT, CDCB20 resulted in a decreased ipsilateral mean lung dose. The low-dose region (V5) of the ipsilateral lung in OBDB (84.0%) was the highest among all techniques (p < 0.001). The mean dose of the heart in CB was significantly reduced (by 11.5–22.4%) compared with other techniques. The V30 of the heart in CDCB20 (1.9%) was significantly lower than that of CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT. Compared to the mean dose of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of 5F-IMRT (27.0 Gy), CDCB0, CDCB10, CDCB15, CDCB20 and OBDB reduced the mean dose effectively by 31.7%, 38.3%, 39.6%, 42.0 and 56.2%, respectively. Considering the parameters of the organs-at-risk (OARs), CDCB10,15,20 had higher expectative values than the other techniques (p = 0.01). Conclusions: HT with the CDCB technique is feasible for treating left-sided breast cancer patients. The CDCB10-20 techniques not only achieved similar planning target volume coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity but also allowed better sparing of the heart and bilateral lungs. Advances in knowledge: For left-sided breast cancer patients whose RNI field includes the IMN, heart avoidance is an important issue. The CDCB technique achieved good PTV coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity and allowed better sparing of the mean dose of the lung, the LAD artery, and the heart and reduced the V30 of the heart.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document