Facilitators of Practitioner Adherence to a Risk/Need Assessment Tool: Hypothesis Testing on a Survey of Juvenile Probation Officers

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (16) ◽  
pp. 1757-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Miller ◽  
Carrie Maloney

We used a statewide survey to test hypotheses about the predictors of juvenile probation officers’ adherence to the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) risk/need assessment (RNA) tool, focusing on (1) the consistency and quality with which officers completed the tool, and (2) the extent to which they used it in decisions. While some hypotheses had been tested in prior quantitative studies, others were based on insights from case studies. Results showed that leadership and climate variables were consistently important in predicting adherence, though these tended to operate indirectly through their effects on other facilitators. Probation officer attitudes, either toward the YLS/CMI or to evidence-based practices, were also important across adherence measures. Although inconsistent in their effects across dependent variables, quality assurance of officer decision-making, external office relationships, and county YLS/CMI policies also predicted adherence.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Sydney N. Ingel ◽  
Lynnea R. Davis ◽  
Danielle S. Rudes ◽  
Taylor N. Hartwell ◽  
Tess K. Drazdowski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-233
Author(s):  
Joel Miller ◽  
Carrie Maloney ◽  
Courtney S. Harding ◽  
Krissinda Palmer ◽  
Jesse Brey ◽  
...  

We examined implementation outcomes several years after rollout of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) risk/need assessment (RNA) tool in five diverse Pennsylvania county juvenile probation offices. Offices had policies to direct the use of the YLS/CMI, and officers tended to view the tool favorably, complete it, and apply it in their work. However, there were also variations in the extent of implementation. These seemed related to differences in office leadership and climate, implementation and quality assurance strategies, probation officers’ support for reforms, and the broader stakeholder environment. Results are largely consistent with implementation science principles.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickey D. Stein ◽  
Bryan T. Forrester ◽  
Hannah Holt ◽  
Larry E. Beutler

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Vincent ◽  
Laura S. Guy ◽  
Samantha L. Fusco ◽  
Bernice G. Gershenson

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. White ◽  
Matthew C. Aalsma ◽  
Evan D. Holloway ◽  
Erin L. Adams ◽  
Michelle P. Salyers

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Viglione ◽  
Danielle Rudes ◽  
Vienna Nightingale ◽  
Carolyn Watson ◽  
Faye Taxman

The role of juvenile probation officers (JPOs) involves a balancing act between “child saving” and community safety activities. In this study, we examine JPOs’ supervision strategies and how these fit within a juvenile justice framework. Using surveys and latent class analysis, we examine the extent to which JPOs engage in a variety of case management and supervision strategies. Findings reveal little evidence supporting a purely law enforcement role and identified a new class of JPOs that does not fit within the traditional role definitions but focuses on a pro forma role that was nonengaged in case management and supervision activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document