scholarly journals Nitric Oxide Production is More Prominent in off-Pump than in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mitaka ◽  
K. Yokoyama ◽  
T. Imai
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
No Production ◽  
Excretion Ratio ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

The aim of our study was to elucidate the extent to which cardiopulmonary bypass contributes to endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). One-hundred-and-sixteen patients undergoing elective CABG with (on-pump, n=66) and without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump, n=50) were included. Urinary nitrite/nitrate (NOx) excretion was measured as an index of endogenous NO production during the first two postoperative days. Haemodynamic profiles, serum CK-MB and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were measured after the operation. There was no significant difference in urinary NOx/creatinine (Cr) excretion on day one post CABG. The mean urinary NOx/Cr excretion ratio significantly (P <0.01) decreased from days one to two in the on-pump group, but not in the off-pump group. The mean urinary NOx/Cr excretion ratio was significantly (P<0.01) higher in the off-pump group (0.51± 0.26 μmol/mg) than in the on-pump group (0.38± 0.20 μmol/mg) on day two. The mean serum CRP concentration was also significantly (P <0.01) higher in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group on day two. There was no significant difference in the mean cardiac index or the mean systemic vascular resistance index between the two groups after surgery. The mean serum CK-MB concentration was significantly (P<0.05) lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group on days one and two. These findings suggest that endogenous NO production is stimulated by a surgical inflammatory response and that the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure per se is not the inciting stimulus for NO production in patients undergoing CABG.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary surgery through sternotomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Birla ◽  
P Patel ◽  
G Aresu ◽  
G Asimakopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Opcab Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Introduction Although it is not a new technique, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is employed only by a few surgeons in the UK. We compared our experience with MIDCAB with that of single vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) graft surgery through a standard median sternotomy. Methods Patients who underwent either MIDCAB or OPCAB between April 2008 and July 2011 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients with an ejection fraction of <0.5 or previous cardiac surgery. Data were obtained retrospectively from our prospective database, medical records and through general practitioners. Results Overall, 74 patients were analysed in the MIDCAB group and 78 in the OPCAB group. Their demographics and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) values were comparable (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups in terms of mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, postoperative stroke, wound infection, atrial fibrillation or need for reintervention. The MIDCAB group had six conversions to a sternotomy. Eight patients in each group required blood transfusion, with the average transfusion being 1.8 units in the MIDCAB group and 3.2 units in the OPCAB group. The mean duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay was 5.0 hours and 38.4 hours in the MIDCAB group and 5.4 and 47.8 hours in the OPCAB group. The mean hospital stay was significantly reduced in the MIDCAB population (6.1 vs 8.5 days, p<0.05). Conclusions MIDCAB can be performed safely in appropriately selected patients with outcomes comparable with OPCAB. The potential benefits include shorter hospital stay, reduced need for blood transfusion and faster recovery.

Thrombelastographic changes in OPCAB surgical patients

Perfusion ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
R L Quigley ◽  
D W Fried ◽  
R Salenger ◽  
J Pym ◽  
R Y Highbloom
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Small Reduction ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pump Coronary Artery Bypass

The purpose of this study was to determine whether thrombelastography could detect hypercoagulability in the off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patient. Seventeen OPCAB and six cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients were studied pre- and postprocedure, as well as on each of the first three postoperative days (POD). In the OPCAB patients, there was a small reduction in the postprocedure coagulation index (CI). This was followed by an increase in the CI on each of the next three POD, reaching a level exceeding the mean preprocedure CI by 2.32 units, indicative of a state of relative hyper- coagulability. The mean CI for the CPB patients decreased significantly in the postprocedure sample. Over the next 72 h, the CI increased to a level that nearly equaled the preprocedure ‘baseline’. We concluded that our study identified a state of relative hypercoagulability in the OPCAB patient 72 h after surgery. The mechanism of this hypercoagulation, as well as the clinical significance of this finding, is yet to be determined.

Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality and Stroke after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Octogenarians

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzad G. Raja ◽  
Jaymin Shah ◽  
Manoraj Navaratnarajah ◽  
Fouad Amin ◽  
Mohamed Amrani
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pump Cabg

Objective Octogenarians, as the fastest growing stratum of the population and with the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease, are being increasingly referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The general perception is that the presence of comorbidities and the propensity for neurological injury expose them to a higher risk for mortality and morbidity after conventional on-pump CABG, and therefore, off-pump CABG should be preferentially offered to octogenarians to improve outcomes. This study evaluates the in-hospital outcomes and predictors of mortality and stroke in octogenarians undergoing on- and off-pump CABG at our institution. Methods From January 2000 to December 2010, a total of 290 octogenarians underwent off-pump (n = 217) and on-pump (n = 73) CABG. Their data were prospectively entered into the cardiac surgery database (Patients Analysis & Tracking System; Dendrite Clinical Systems, Ltd, Oxford, England, United Kingdom) and analyzed retrospectively. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality, major complications, and length of stay. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of combined outcome of in-hospital mortality and stroke. Results The mean ± SD age of the patients was 82 ± 2.0 years. Preoperative demographics were similar for the on-pump and off-pump groups. The patients who underwent off-pump CABG had a lower number of distal anastomoses performed compared with the patients who underwent on-pump CABG [mean difference, 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02–0.4; P = 0.03]. However, the ratio of grafts (received/needed) was the same in both groups. In-hospital mortality for the entire cohort was 7.2%, with no significant difference between the groups for death (6.0% vs 11.0%; P = 0.08), stroke (2.8% vs 2.8%; P = 1.0), other major complications, and length of hospital stay. Independent predictors of combined outcome identified from the multiple logistic model included heart failure [odds ratio (OR), 4.4; 95% CI, 1.5–13.0; P = 0.008], diabetes (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0–6.0; P = 0.046), nitrate infusion (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1–8.0; P = 0.04), postoperative renal failure requiring hemofiltration (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 3.5–21.1; P < 0.001), and postoperative ventricular arrhythmias (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.9–27.8; P = 0.009). Conclusions Both on-pump and off-pump CABG are reasonable revascularization strategies in octogenarians. Careful patient selection and individualized treatment decisions can minimize postoperative mortality and morbidity in octogenarians undergoing on- and off-pump CABG.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Stroke—Exploratory Analysis of the GOPCABE Trial and Methodological Considerations

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (06) ◽  
pp. 464-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Zacher ◽  
Jochen Boergermann ◽  
Utz Kappert ◽  
Michael Hilker ◽  
Gloria Färber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Pump Cabg ◽  
Pump Coronary Artery Bypass

Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) may reduce severe adverse events including stroke. Methods In the German Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly patients trial, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was compared in 2,394 elderly (≥ 75 years) patients undergoing CABG with (on-pump) or without (off-pump) cardiopulmonary bypass. This exploratory post-hoc analysis investigated the impact of surgical aortic manipulation on the rate of stroke. Results There was no significant difference in the rate of stroke within 30 days after surgery between both groups (off-pump: 2.2%; on-pump: 2.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.83 [0.5–1.38]; p = 0.47). Within the off-pump group, different degrees of aortic manipulation did not lead to significant different stroke rates (tangential clamping: 2.3%; OR 0.86 [0.46–1.60]; clampless device: 1.8%; OR 0.67 [0.26–1.75]; no aortic manipulation: 2.4%; OR 0.88 [0.37–2.14]). An aggregate analysis including more than 10,000 patients out of the four recent major trials also yielded comparable stroke rates for on- and off-pump CABG (off-pump: 1.4%; on-pump: 1.7%; OR 0.87 [0.64–1.20]). Conclusion Within recent prospective randomized multicenter trials off-pump CABG did not result in lower stroke rates. The possible intrinsic benefit of off-pump CABG may be offset by the complexity of the operative therapy as well as the multiple pathomechanisms involved in perioperative stroke.

scholarly journals Graft patency at 3 months after off- and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lokeswara Rao Sajja ◽  
Kunal Sarkar ◽  
Gopichand Mannam ◽  
Venkata Krishna Kumar Kodali ◽  
Chandrasekar Padmanabhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Graft Patency ◽  
Conventional Coronary Angiography ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pump Cabg

Abstract Purpose Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed either with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump). There is a scarcity of angiographic data to support the non-inferiority of off-pump technique to on-pump technique. The objective of this study is to ascertain the non-inferiority of off-pump CABG when compared to on-pump CABG in terms of angiographically assessed graft patency at 3 months. Methods A total of 320 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were enrolled in a multicenter prospective randomized trial either to on-pump CABG (n = 162) or off-pump CABG (n = 158) between March 2016 through March 2017. Graft patency was evaluated by using either multidetector computerized tomographic angiography or conventional coronary angiography at 3 months. The major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE) were also analyzed at 3 months. Results The median number of grafts per patient in off-pump was 3.00 (Q1:3.00 and Q3:4.00) vs on-pump 4.00 (Q1:3.00 to Q3:4.00), and the mean number of grafts per patient was lower in the off-pump CABG at 3.45 ± 0.75 vs 3.64 ± 0.70 in the on-pump CABG (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in mortality at 3 months between the off-pump (0.63%) and on-pump groups (1.85%) with p value of 0.62. The cumulative combined MACCE showed significant difference between off-pump group (0.63%) and on-pump group (5.55%), p = 0.01. Follow-up angiograms were done in 239 (75%) patients with 120 off-pump and 119 in the on-pump group. The analysis was also done regarding graft patency in a graded manner—when analysis of A (excellent) grafts vs B (stenosed) grafts and O (occluded) grafts were made, there was no statistically significant difference in overall graft patency at 3 months between on-pump [376 /429 grafts (87.6%)] and off-pump [366 /420 grafts (87.1%)] groups (p = 0.82). The patency rates were similar among bypass conduits (left internal thoracic artery (ITA) in off-pump (91.4%) vs on-pump (92.9%) p = 0.66, right ITA in off-pump (82.1%) vs on-pump (81.8%) p = 0.97, radial artery in off-pump (84.4%) vs on-pump (82.6%) p = 0.81; saphenous vein in off-pump (85.8%) vs on-pump (86.3%), p = 0.86 and among 3 coronary territories. Conclusions Off-pump CABG is non-inferior to on-pump CABG in terms of overall graft patency at 3 months and was associated with a fewer combined cumulative MACCE compared to on-pump CABG.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document