Somatosensory Evoked Potentials In Cluster Headache Patients Under Histamine Stimulation

Cephalalgia ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 347-348
Author(s):  
V. Gallai ◽  
C. Firenze ◽  
L. Mattelli ◽  
G. Mazzotta ◽  
F. Del Gatto
Cephalalgia ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Firenze ◽  
Frances Del Gatto ◽  
Giovanni Mazzotta ◽  
Virgilio Gallai

Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) after median nerve stimulation were studied in 34 patients with common migraine, in 30 patients with muscle-contraction headache, and in 10 cluster headache patients. The SEPs were registered before and after histamine administration. Latency values in common migraineurs showed no variation when compared with those in controls. Although not statistically significant, the N1-P2 amplitude was increased in 14 (41.1%) of these patients after histamine stimulation. No changes were observed in muscle-contraction headache patients either with or without histamine administration. In all cluster headache patients, the N1-P2 amplitude decreased after histamine stimulation. These results are discussed in the light of current hypotheses concerning the pathophysiologic mechanisms of headache.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 414-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
JA van Vliet ◽  
AA Vein ◽  
S Le Cessie ◽  
MD Ferrari ◽  

Cluster headache (CH) typically presents in clusters of attacks of intense (peri)orbital, unilateral pain. The distribution of the pain implies involvement of central and/or peripheral trigeminal pathways. These can be investigated by means of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials (TSEP) and blink reflexes (BR). We aimed to relate functional changes in trigeminal sensory pathways to the presence of cluster periods. TSEP and BR were performed in 28 episodic CH patients during a cluster period and repeated in 22 outside a cluster period. TSEP latencies (N1, P1 and N2) and amplitude (N1-P1 and P1-N2) and BR latencies (R1, R2 ipsilateral and R2 contralateral) were compared between sides, during and outside a cluster period and with healthy control data ( n = 22). During a cluster period, N2 TSEP latencies were longer on the symptomatic side compared with the non-symptomatic side (27.2 ± 3.0 ms vs. 26.3 ± 3.4 ms, P = 0.02), and compared with the same side outside the cluster period (26.7 ± 3.1 ms vs. 25.1 ± 3.0 ms, P = 0.01). N1, P1 and N2 latencies on the symptomatic side in patients during the cluster period (14.8 ± 2.3 ms, 20.4 ± 2.5 ms and 27.2 ± 3.0 ms, respectively) were significantly longer than those of healthy controls (13.4 ± 1.9 ms, 18.8 ± 2.4 ms and 25.0 ± 2.6 ms, respectively, P < 0.03). Outside the cluster period, N1 latencies of both sides (15.3 ± 2.8 ms symptomatic side and 15.4 ± 2.6 ms asymptomatic side) were longer compared with controls (13.4 ± 1.9 ms, P < 0.04). TSEP amplitudes and BR latencies revealed no significant differences. We conclude that abnormalities of the afferent trigeminal pathway are present in patients with cluster headache, most prominent during the cluster period, and on the symptomatic side. This seems primarily due of changes within the higher cerebral regions of the system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document