Systematic Review of Research on Driver Distraction in the Context of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

Author(s):  
Apoorva P. Hungund ◽  
Ganesh Pai ◽  
Anuj K. Pradhan

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) promise improved driving performance and safety. With ADAS taking on more vehicle control tasks, the driver’s role may be reduced to that of passive supervision. This in turn may increase drivers’ engagement in non-driving-related tasks, thereby potentially reducing any promised safety benefit. We conducted a systematic review, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to study the relationship between ADAS use and driver distraction. Four research questions were addressed—two questions examined the effect of ADAS on secondary task engagement, and the quality of secondary task performance, and two addressed the effects of ADAS on driver attention and on driver behavior changes caused by secondary task engagement. Twenty-nine papers were selected for full text synthesis. The majority of the papers indicate an association between ADAS and increased secondary task engagement, as well as improved secondary task performance. Ten papers reported that drivers tend to divert their attention to secondary tasks and away from driving tasks. These outcomes highlight the continued importance of the role of the human driver despite vehicle automation, especially in the context of driver distraction, and that user understanding of ADAS functionalities and limitations is essential to appropriate and effective use of these systems.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolphe J. Béquet ◽  
Antonio R. Hidalgo-Muñoz ◽  
Christophe Jallais

Background: Stress can frequently occur in the driving context. Its cognitive effects can be deleterious and lead to uncomfortable or risky situations. While stress detection in this context is well developed, regulation using dedicated advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) is still emergent.Objectives: This systematic review focuses on stress regulation strategies that can be qualified as “subtle” or “mindless”: the technology employed to perform regulation does not interfere with an ongoing task. The review goal is 2-fold: establishing the state of the art on such technological implementation in the driving context and identifying complementary technologies relying on subtle regulation that could be applied in driving.Methods: A systematic review was conducted using search operators previously identified through a concept analysis. The patents and scientific studies selected provide an overview of actual and potential mindless technology implementations. These are then analyzed from a scientific perspective. A classification of results was performed according to the different stages of emotion regulation proposed by the Gross model.Results: A total of 47 publications were retrieved, including 21 patents and 26 studies. Six of the studies investigated mindless stress regulation in the driving context. Patents implemented strategies mostly linked to attentional deployment, while studies tended to investigate response modulation strategies.Conclusions: This review allowed us to identify several ADAS relying on mindless computing technologies to reduce stress and better understand the underlying mechanisms allowing stress reduction. Further studies are necessary to better grasp the effect of mindless technologies on driving safety. However, we have established the feasibility of their implementation as ADAS and proposed directions for future research in this field.


i-com ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Dagmar Kern ◽  
Schneegaß Stefan

AbstractThe complexity of automotive user interfaces increased rapidly in the last decades, drivers are now confronted with many new functions. Infotainment, entertainment and comfort systems as well as driver assistance systems contribute to this trend. The use of new functionalities inevitably increases the driver′s interaction with the user interface and decreases the driver′s focus on driving. Before introducing new functionalities in the car it is essential to evaluate their effect on driver distraction. We present CARS, an open source driving simulator tool for evaluating automotive user interfaces. We give an overview of CARS′ characteristics and present the map editor, the driving simulation tool, and the analysis tool included in CARS. Based on results from initial user studies we illustrate the effectiveness of CARS in evaluating different secondary tasks with regard to driver distraction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Biondi ◽  
David L. Strayer ◽  
Riccardo Rossi ◽  
Massimiliano Gastaldi ◽  
Claudio Mulatti

Author(s):  
Sơn

Các hệ thống hỗ trợ lái xe tiên tiến (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: ADAS) đóng một vai trò quan trọng trong hệ thống an toàn chủ động chỉ có camera và các phương tiện tự động thông minh. Đối với các ứng dụng này, các yêu cầu về hiệu suất phát hiện đáng tin cậy và thời gian thực là các yếu tố cấp thiết. Bài báo này đề xuất giải pháp tối ưu tốc độ phát hiện ô tô và giảm các cảnh báo lỗi cho các hệ thống phát hiện điểm mù. Theo đó, trước tiên chúng tôi đề xuất bộ phân tầng Cascade – AdaBoost cùng với tập dữ liệu mẫu và thuật toán đào tạo của chúng tôi. Ngoài ra, để cải thiện tốc độ phát hiện, một kĩ thuật lựa chọn vùng quan tâm (Region of Interest: ROI) cũng được sử dụng để tránh trích xuất các vùng có khả năng tạo ra các cảnh báo lỗi như là bầu trời hoặc các vùng không phù hợp với phối cảnh. Phương pháp đề xuất đã tăng tốc độ phát hiện lên ít nhất 1,9 lần và giảm cảnh báo lỗi 2,24 lần so với phương pháp truyền thống ở các ảnh có độ phân giải cao (720 x 480) với tỷ lệ phát hiện đạt 99,4% và tỷ lệ cảnh báo lỗi nhỏ là 4,08%. Phương pháp đề xuất này có thể được ứng dụng cho các xe tự hành thông minh thời gian thực.


Author(s):  
Francesco Rundo ◽  
Roberto Leotta ◽  
Sebastiano Battiato ◽  
Concetto Spampinato ◽  
Sabrina Conoci

Author(s):  
Daniel Palac ◽  
Iiona D. Scully ◽  
Rachel K. Jonas ◽  
John L. Campbell ◽  
Douglas Young ◽  
...  

The emergence of vehicle technologies that promote driver safety and convenience calls for investigation of the prevalence of driver assistance systems as well as of their use rates. A consumer driven understanding as to why certain vehicle technology is used remains largely unexplored. We examined drivers’ experience using 13 different advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and several reasons that may explain rates of use through a nationally-distributed survey. Our analysis focused on drivers’ levels of understanding and trust with their vehicle’s ADAS as well as drivers’ perceived ease, or difficulty, in using the systems. Respondents’ age and experience with Level 0 or Level 1 technologies revealed additional group differences, suggesting older drivers (55+), and those with only Level 0 systems as using ADAS more often. These data are interpreted using the Driver Behavior Questionnaire framework and offer a snapshot of the pervasiveness of certain driver safety systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document