Vaginal surgery in female urinary incontinence: Physiopathological concepts

1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
W. Artibani

— The theoretical advantages and disadvantages of the vaginal approach for the treatment of female urinary incontinence are outlined on the basis of a literature review and personal experience. The need for a better understanding of the influence of the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor on the anatomy and function of the female bladder neck and urethra is highlighted. The main advantage of vaginal surgery is the simultaneous correction of anterior, central and posterior defects, restoring or preserving vesicourethral, sexual and rectoanal anatomy and function.

1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
P. Graziotti ◽  
C. Guizzetti ◽  
R. Orlando ◽  
A. Lembo

— Transvaginal needle bladder neck suspension for stress urinary incontinence: personal experience. The Authors present their personal experience of 30 patients operated between 1988–1991 for stress urinary incontinence with transvaginal needle bladder neck suspension. 9 patients were treated with Gittes procedure, 14 with Raz and 7 with sling and minisling. Minimal post-operative complications, despite chronic urinary retentions, were observed. With a mean follow-up of 18 months (7–48) they report recurrence of incontinence respectively in 56%, 23% and 16% of the patients. With the significant rate of failure, even after repeated procedure, the Authors have drawn the conclusion that transvaginal needle-suspension should not be considered standard treatment of female S.U.I. They stress the need to carefully select patients. Females with major vaginal prolapse or significant rectocele are, from the authors' point of view, the best candidates for this kind of technique.


1975 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. P. Olesen ◽  
S. Walter ◽  
C. Frimodt-Møller ◽  
S. Hebjørn ◽  
P. A. Gammelgaard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document