The Role of Information and Communication Technology in End-of-Life Planning Among a Sample of Canadian LGBT Older Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 536-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Mock ◽  
Earl P. Walker ◽  
Áine M. Humble ◽  
Brian de Vries ◽  
Gloria Gutman ◽  
...  

To better understand the role of technology in later-life planning among older lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT) adults, we conducted focus groups to explore factors linked to diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. Twenty focus groups were facilitated across Canada with 93 participants aged 55 to 89. Constant comparative analysis yielded four categories: (a) fear, (b) individual benefits, (d) social elements, and (d) contextual elements. Fear related to technology and fear of end-of-life planning. Individual benefits referred to technology as a platform for developing LGBT identities and as a source of information for later-life planning. Social elements were establishment and maintenance of personal relationships and social support networks. Contextual elements referred to physical and situational barriers to technology use that limited access and usability. These findings can inform technological practice and services to enhance later-life planning.

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (s) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
G. Gutman ◽  
S. Mock ◽  
B. De Vries ◽  
A. Humble ◽  
J. Gahagan ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Hamm

Background and Purpose: Palliative and end of life care are gaining importance in the healthcare environment. Palliative care and hospice may be underutilized in this population. Evaluation of current process will determine opportunities for improvement. Methods and Results: Retrospective review of patients admitted over one year with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hemorrhagic stroke was completed, assessing 575 records. This population included 491 AIS and 84 hemorrhages. Eighty-one AIS patients received t-PA. Discharge status distribution included: 269 to home; 114 to acute rehabilitation; 123 to skilled nursing facilities (SNF); 29 to hospice; and 42 died. Fifty-five patients had comfort care orders prior to discharge: 32 by hospital day two, 23 by hospital day three or later. AIS patients with comfort care orders had an average NIHSS of 17; hemorrhagic stroke patients had an average GCS of 5. Patients with comfort care orders were an average age of 72 years with equal distribution (AIS = 27; hemorrhage = 28) and gender (25 male, 30 female); majority were Caucasian (3 African American, 1 Latino, 1 Asian). Twenty patients with similar characteristics were discharged to SNF with no discussion of palliative care or hospice. A review of records revealed provider disagreement for long-term prognosis as a significant barrier to patient/family decisions regarding end of life choices, or supporting choices made by patients/family opting for palliative care. Conclusions: Based on these data, a palliative care nurse joined the stroke team, and the stroke coordinator joined the palliative care committee to assist in these conversations. Palliative care training for providers is on-going in the acute care setting, while outpatient providers are being engaged in utilizing The Iowa Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (IPOST).This document was designed to promote community care coordination and advanced care planning, in order to provide seamless communication and execution of individual care choices across the healthcare continuum. As these strategies are implemented, an increase in end of life planning is anticipated.


Author(s):  
Natasha Ansari ◽  
Eric Johnson ◽  
Jennifer A. Sinnott ◽  
Sikandar Ansari

Background: Oncology provider discussions of treatment options, outcomes of treatment, and end of life planning are essential to care for patients with advanced malignancies. Studies have shown that despite this, many patients do not have adequate care planning, including end of life planning. It is thought that the accessibility of information outside of clinical encounters and individual factors and/or beliefs may influence the patient’s perception of disease. Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate if patient understanding of treatment goals matched the provider and if there were areas of discrepancy. If a discrepancy was found, the survey inquired further into more specific aspects. Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was performed at a cancer hospital outpatient clinic. 100 consecutive and consenting patients who had stage IV non-curable lung, gastrointestinal (GI), or other cancer were included in the study. Patients must have had at least 2 visits with their oncologist. Results: 40 patients reported their disease might be curable and 60 reported their disease was not curable. Patients who reported their disease was not curable were more likely to be 65 years or older (P-value: 0.055). They were more likely to report that their doctor discussed the possibility of their cancer getting worse (78.3% VS 55%; P-value 0.024), that their doctor discussed end of life plans (58.3% VS 30%; P- value: 0.01), and that they had appointed a health care decision-maker (86.7% VS 62.5%; P-value: 0.01). 65% of patients who thought their disease might be curable reported that their doctor said it might be curable, compared with only 6.7% of patients who thought their disease was not curable (p < 0.001). Or, equivalently, 35% of patients who thought their disease might be curable reported that their doctor’s opinion was that it was not curable, compared with 93% of patients who thought their disease was not curable (p < 0.001). Patients who had lung cancer were more likely to believe their cancer was not curable than patients with gastrointestinal or other cancer, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.165). Patients who said their disease might be curable selected as possible reasons that a miracle (50%) or alternative medicine (66.7%) would get rid of the cancer, or said their family wanted them to believe the cancer would go away (16.7%) or that another doctor said it would (4.2%). Patients who said their disease might be curable said they did so due to alternative medications, another doctor, or their family. Restricting to the 70 patients who reported their doctors telling them their disease was not curable, 20% of them still said that they personally felt their disease might be curable. Patients below 65 years of age were more likely to disagree with the doctor in this case (P-value: 0.047). Conclusion: This survey of patients diagnosed with stage IV cancer shows that a significant number of patients had misunderstandings of the treatment and curability of their disease. Findings suggest that a notable proportion kept these beliefs even after being told by treating physicians that their disease is not curable.


2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 47-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna C. Heyman ◽  
Irene A. Gutheil

Author(s):  
Dina Utami ◽  
Timothy Bickmore ◽  
Asimina Nikolopoulou ◽  
Michael Paasche-Orlow

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
William P. Tompkins ◽  
Christine Agnes Ciunci ◽  
Suzanne Walker ◽  
Kelly Patton ◽  
Amy Schwartz ◽  
...  

29 Background: Hospice has been associated with improved quality of life for patients, cost savings, and reduction in caregiver-grief-related depression. While cancer patients make up a plurality of hospice utilizers nationally, many patients are only on hospice for a limited period (in Medicare patients, a median of 18 days). Studies suggest engaging cancer patients to discuss goals and priorities using the Serious Illness Conversation (SIC) Guide has a positive impact on prognostic understanding and end-of-life planning. More frequent utilization of SICs may prompt earlier enrollment of oncology patients in hospice when appropriate. Methods: We identified cancer patients enrolled in hospice at the Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center from 2019-2020 after all providers received SIC training. Patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, type of hospice (home versus inpatient), SIC usage, palliative care referral patterns and time on hospice were abstracted. Results: 104 patients were enrolled in hospice during the study period. The majority of patients were female (51%). 45% were Caucasian, and 31% were African American. The most common cancer diagnoses were thoracic (52%) and gastrointestinal (32%) malignancies. 85 patients (82%) were enrolled on home hospice and 19 patients (18%) inpatient hospice. Palliative care usage included 50 inpatient and 24 outpatient consultations; 30 patients (29%) in the cohort never utilized palliative care. 52 (50%) of patients did not have a SIC. 47% (40 patients) enrolled in home hospice had an SIC while 63% (12 patients) on inpatient hospice had an SIC. The median time interval between a patient’s SIC conversation and hospice enrollment was longer in home hospice patients (74 days) compared to inpatient hospice (33 days). Patients on home hospice spent an average of 44 days on hospice versus 2 days in the inpatient setting. Conclusions: Half of the patients at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center enrolled in hospice during the study period did not have an SIC, and 29% did not see palliative care prior to starting hospice. The median time from SIC initiation to hospice enrollment was significantly longer for patients on home hospice compared to inpatient hospice suggesting a need for earlier SIC interventions. Patients enrolled in inpatient hospice spent a considerably shorter period of time on hospice also underscoring the importance of earlier end of life planning. Our findings indicate a need for additional interventions to facilitate earlier SIC conversations in the outpatient setting and a demand for increased palliative care access.


2011 ◽  
pp. 513-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Zimmermann ◽  
Amanda Caissie ◽  
Orit Freedman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document