Quality of Care for Patients With Diabetes and Mulitmorbidity Registered at Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Heale ◽  
Elizabeth Wenghofer ◽  
Susan James ◽  
Marie-Luce Garceau
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Organizational Characteristics ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

Background Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics are a new model of primary healthcare in Ontario. Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics are distinctive in that nurse practitioners are the primary care providers working with an interprofessional team. There have been no evaluations of the quality of care within the Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinic model. Purpose Evaluation of the Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinic model, specifically for complex clinical presentations, will provide insights that may be used to inform improvements to the delivery of care in the Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which diabetes care was complete and to determine the impact of organizational tools, including electronic medical record tracking, diabetes care template, and referral to community programs, on the completeness of care for patients with diabetes and multimorbidity at Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics. Methods An audit of 30 charts was conducted at five different Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics (n = 150) for patients with diabetes and at least one other chronic condition. Indicators included patient and organizational characteristics as well as diabetes care items taken from diabetes clinical guidelines. Results Overall, care for patients with diabetes and multimorbidity in Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics was complete. However, there were no significant associations between patient or organizational characteristics and the extent to which diabetes care was complete.

The Impact of Primary Care Dual-Management on Quality of Care

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Kaboli ◽  
Daniel M. Shivapour ◽  
Michael S. Henderson ◽  
Areef Ishani ◽  
Mary E. Charlton
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Hemoglobin A1c ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Dual Management ◽  
The Impact

Background: Discontinuity is common in US healthcare. Patients access multiple systems of care and in the nation’s largest integrated healthcare system, Veteran’s Administration (VA) patients frequently use non-VA primary care providers. The impact of this “dual-management” on quality is unknown. The authors’ objective was to identify dual-management and associations with markers of care quality for hypertension and associated conditions. Methods: Data was collected via surveys and chart reviews of primary care patients with hypertension from six VA clinics in Iowa and Minnesota. Clinical measures abstracted included the following: goal blood pressure (BP) and use of guideline-concordant therapy, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, hemoglobin A1C, and body mass index (BMI). Dual-management data was obtained through self-report. Results: Of 189 subjects (mean age = 66), 36% were dual-managed by non-VA providers. There was no difference in hypertension quality of care measures by dual-management status. A total of 51% were at BP goal and 58% were on guideline-concordant therapy. Dual-managed patients were more likely to use thiazide diuretics (43% vs 29%; P = .03) and angiotensin receptor blockers (13% vs 3%; P < .01), but less likely to use angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (43% vs 61%; P = .02). There was no difference in LDL cholesterol (97.1 mg/dl vs 100.1 mg/dl; P = .55), hemoglobin A1C (7% vs 6%; P = .74), or BMI (29.8 vs 30.9; P = .40) for dual-managed versus VA managed patients, respectively. Conclusions: Although dual-management may decrease continuity, VA/private sector dual-management did not impact quality of care, though some medication differences were observed. With the high prevalence of dual-management, future work should further address quality and evaluate redundancy of services.

scholarly journals Nurse practitioner’s perceptions of the impact of the nurse practitioner-led clinic model on the quality of care of complex patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 553-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Heale ◽  
Susan James ◽  
Elizabeth Wenghofer ◽  
Marie-Luce Garceau
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Issues ◽  
Recruitment And Retention ◽  
Interprofessional Team

AimTo evaluate the organizational processes that influence the quality of care for patients with multimorbidity at nurse practitioner-led clinics (NPLCs).BackgroundPeople are living longer, most with one or more chronic diseases (mulitmorbidity) and primary healthcare for these patients has become increasingly complex. One response was the establishment of new models of primary healthcare. NPLCs are an example of a model developed in Ontario, Canada, which feature nurse practitioners as the primary care providers practicing within an interprofessional team. Evaluation of the extent to which the processes within NPLC model addressed the needs of patients with multimorbidity is warranted.MethodsEight nurse practitioners were interviewed to determine their perception of the quality of care provided to patients with multimorbidity at NPLCs. Interpretive description guided the analysis and themes were identified.FindingsThree themes arose from the analysis, each of which has an impact on the quality of care. The level of patient vulnerability at the NPLCs was high resulting in the need to address social and financial issues before the care of chronic conditions. Dynamics within the interprofessional team impacted the quality of patient care, including NP recruitment and retention, leaves of absence and turnover in staff at the NPLCs had an effect on interprofessional team functioning and patient care. Finally, coordination of care at the NPLCs, such as length of appointments, determined the extent to which attention was given to individual clinical issues was a factor. Strategies to address social determinants of health and for recruitment and retention of NPs is essential for improved quality of care. Comprehensive orientation to the interprofessional team as well as flexibility in care processes may also have positive effects on the quality of care of patients with complex clinical issues.

scholarly journals Targeting the nurse practitioner workforce: Influences and barriers in choosing rural practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Mykell Barnacle ◽  
Allison Peltier ◽  
Heidi Saarinen ◽  
Christine Olson ◽  
Dean Gross
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Rural Practice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Family Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Practice Readiness ◽  
The Impact

Background and objective: Recruitment and retention of primary care providers are projected to worsen in rural regions. Nurse practitioners (NPs) are a crucial solution to the shortage of primary care providers in rural America. Little research exists regarding factors influencing new NPs’ decisions to practice in rural settings, as well as practice readiness. The purpose of this study is to explore factors influencing new NPs’ decision to practice in rural settings.Methods: A survey of family nurse practitioner (FNP) graduates in a rural state was conducted. The survey measured rural background, current practice environment, the impact of rural clinical experiences on readiness to practice, and perceptions of rural NP practice.Results: The data collected over five years (N = 42) indicated several factors that influenced an NP’s decision to choose a position in a rural or underserved setting. A wide scope of practice, rural roots, a desirable job offer, and strong relationships were influential when choosing rural practice.Conclusions: Most respondents (69%) were not practicing in rural or underserved areas. Among those who were, the ability to practice to the full scope of education and autonomy were the most important factors. However, respondents were also apprehensive and intimidated with the broad skill set required in rural care. Implications: This study provides insight into factors and barriers for new graduate NPs in choosing a rural practice setting as well as possible solutions to the rural workforce shortage.

scholarly journals Private ownership of primary care providers associated with patient perceived quality of care

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. e5755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolin Wei ◽  
Jia Yin ◽  
Samuel Y.S. Wong ◽  
Sian M. Griffiths ◽  
Guanyang Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Quality ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Quality Of Care

Improving Primary Care Access to Respirologists Using eConsult

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Grégoire Leduc ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Amir Afkham ◽  
Misha Marovac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Question ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Provider Perspectives ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Patients and primary care providers (PCP) can experience frustration about poor access to specialist care. The Champlain Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation (BASETM) is a secure online platform that allows PCPs to ask a clinical question to 142 different specialty groups. The specialist is expected to respond within 7 days. Methods: This is a retrospective review of the Champlain BASETM respirology eConsults from January 2017 to December 2018. The eConsults were categorized by types of question asked by the referring provider, and by the clinical content of the referral. Specialists’ response time and time spent answering the clinical question was analyzed. Referring providers close out surveys were reviewed to assess the impact of the respirology eConsult service on traditional referral rates and clinical course of action. Results: Of the 26,679 cases submitted to the Champlain BASE TM eConsult service 268 were respirology cases (1%). 91% were sent by family physicians, 9% by nurse practitioners. The median time to respond by specialists was 0.8 days, and the median time billed by specialists was 20 minutes. The most common topics were pulmonary nodules and masses (16.4%), cough (10.4%), infective problems (8.6%), COPD (8.6%) and dyspnea NYD (7.8%). The most common types of question asked by PCP were related to investigations warranted (43.1% of cases), general management (17.5%), monitoring (12.6%), need for a respirology referral (12.3%), and drug of choice (6.3%). In 23% of cases the PCP indicated they were planning to refer the patient and no longer need to (avoided referrals) and in 13% of cases the PCP was not going to refer but did after receiving the eConsult advice (prompted referrals). The eConsult led to a new or additional clinical course of action by the PCP in 49% of cases. In 51% of cases the PCP suggested the clinical topic would be well suited to a CME event. Conclusions: Participation in eConsult services can improve timely access to respirologists while potentially avoiding clinic visit and significantly impacting referring PCPs clinical course of action. Using the most common clinical topics and types of question for CME planning should be considered. Future research may include a cost analysis, and provider perspectives on the role of eConsult in respirology care.

Headaches

2021 ◽  
pp. 329-342
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Hershey
Keyword(s):  
Early Recognition ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
School Nurses ◽  
Primary Headaches ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Headache Disorders ◽  
Tension Type Headaches ◽  
The Impact

This chapter discusses recurrent headaches, especially when episodic, which are much more likely to represent primary headache disorders. Primary headaches are intrinsic to the nervous system and are the disease itself. Early recognition of the primary headaches in patients should result in improved response and outcome, minimizing the impact of the primary headaches and disability. Primary headaches can be grouped into migraine, tension-type headaches, and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, and an additional grouping of rarer headaches without a secondary cause. The primary headache that has the greatest impact on a child’s quality of life and disability is migraine, and subsequently is the most frequent primary headache brought to the attention of parents, primary care providers, and school nurses.

scholarly journals Online public reactions to frequency of diagnostic errors in US outpatient care

Diagnosis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traber Davis Giardina ◽  
Urmimala Sarkar ◽  
Gato Gourley ◽  
Varsha Modi ◽  
Ashley N.D. Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Diagnostic Errors ◽  
News Article ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Qualitative Researcher ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
The Impact

AbstractDiagnostic errors pose a significant threat to patient safety but little is known about public perceptions of diagnostic errors. A study published inWe searched the World Wide Web for any news article reporting findings from the study. We then gathered all the online comments made in response to the news articles to evaluate public reaction to the newly reported diagnostic error frequency (n=241). Two coders conducted content analyses of the comments and an experienced qualitative researcher resolved differences.Overall, there were few comments made regarding the frequency of diagnostic errors. However, in response to the media coverage, 44 commenters shared personal experiences of diagnostic errors. Additionally, commentary centered on diagnosis-related quality of care as affected by two emergent categories: (1) US health care providers (n=79; 63 commenters) and (2) US health care reform-related policies, most commonly the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and insurance/reimbursement issues (n=62; 47 commenters).The public appears to have substantial concerns about the impact of the ACA and other reform initiatives on the diagnosis-related quality of care. However, policy discussions on diagnostic errors are largely absent from the current national conversation on improving quality and safety. Because outpatient diagnostic errors have emerged as a major safety concern, researchers and policymakers should consider evaluating the effects of policy and practice changes on diagnostic accuracy.

scholarly journals Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205435811987871
Author(s):  
Aminu Bello ◽  
Deenaz Zaidi ◽  
Branko Braam ◽  
Mark Courtney ◽  
Jodi Glassford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Access To Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Practice Facilitation ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Nephrology Care ◽  
The Impact

Background: As the burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase, many geographically dispersed Canadians have limited access to specialist nephrology care, which tends to be centralized in major urban areas. As a result, many rural/remote-dwellers in Canada experience poor quality of care and related adverse outcomes. It is imperative to develop alternative care delivery mechanisms to ensure optimal health outcomes for all Canadians. Objective: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of electronic consultation (eConsult) as a new model for interactions between specialists and primary care providers (PCPs) to improve access to care for patients with CKD. Design: This is a sequential, mixed methods study that will be conducted in 3 phases. Setting: The study will be conducted across the entire province of Alberta, supported by Alberta Kidney Care (formerly, Northern and Southern Alberta Renal Programs [NARP/SARP]). Patients: Patients suffering from CKD will be included in the study. Measurements: We will assess the barriers and enablers of implementation and adoption of an e-consultation protocol to facilitate access to care for patients with CKD in Alberta with a focus on rural/remote-dwellers with CKD. We will also evaluate the impact of the eConsult system (eg, improved access to specialist care, reduction in care gaps), assess the feasibility of province-wide implementation, and compare eConsult with practice facilitation versus eConsult alone in terms of access to specialist care, quality of care, and related outcomes. Methods: The study will be conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, we will assess the perceptions of stakeholders (ie, PCPs, nephrologists, patients, policymakers, and other care providers) to improve CKD care delivery, quality, and outcomes in Alberta with focus groups and semistructured interviews. Phase 2 will engage specific family physicians for their input on key factors and logistical issues affecting the feasibility of implementing eConsult for the care of patients with CKD. Phase 3 will provide academic detailing including practice facilitation to clinics in Alberta to assess how eConsult with practice facilitation compares with eConsult alone in terms of access to specialist care, quality of care, and related outcomes. Results: We will assess stakeholder perceptions about potential barriers to and enablers of a new eConsult and decision support system strategy, focusing on elements that are most important for the design of a feasible and implementable intervention. We will develop, pilot test, and assess the impact of the eConsult model in improving access to specialist nephrology care and the feasibility of province-wide implementation. The final phase of the project will address key challenges for optimal care for patients with CKD living in rural, remote, and underserved areas of Alberta, particularly timely referral and disease management as well as the cost-effective benefits of eConsult. Limitations: Lack of high-speed Internet in many rural and remote areas of Alberta may lead to more time spent in completing the eConsult request online versus faxing a referral the traditional way. Allied health care staff (referral coordinators, administrative staff) require training to the eConsult system, and physicians at many remote sites do not have adequate staff to handle eConsult as an added task. Conclusions: Implementation of eConsult can favorably influence referral patterns, access to care, care quality, patient outcomes, and health care costs for people with CKD. Results of this study will inform the optimization of care for rural/remote-dwellers with CKD and will facilitate future partnerships with policymakers and provincial renal programs in Alberta to ensure optimal kidney health for all residents. Trial registration: Not required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document