Renal Transplantation in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal R. Glass ◽  
Douglas T. Miller ◽  
Hans W. Sollinger ◽  
Stephen W. Zimmerman ◽  
David Simpson ◽  
...  

The authors reviewed the course of 56 peritoneal dialysis patients after renal transplantation to determine the influence of this mode of dialysis on the results of transplantation. Three subgroups were analyzed separately because of marked differences in results. Group 1 was a historical group of 13 diabetic and two nondiabetic recipients of cadaveric grafts transplanted before 1982 who received standard immunosuppression with steroids and azathioprine only, and antirejection therapy with steroids and/or antithymocytic globulin (ATG). In this group results were poor: only 100/o of grafts and 670/o of patients survived two years or more. Group 2, the current group of cadaveric recipients, consists of 11 diabetic and nine nondiabetic patients transplanted since 1982; these patients received standard immunosuppression with low-dose steroids, azathioprine, and a two-week course of prophylactic ATG beginning within one day of transplantation; rejection was treated with high doses of oral steroids. In this second group, results were good: 630/o of the grafts are functioning and 100% of patients have survived for up to two years. Group 3, consisting of 21 recipients of living donor kidneys, had excellent results with 1000/o graft and patient survival up to five years. Rejection (N = 11), death (N = 5) and renovascular problems (N = 3) caused the 19 graft losses. In most patients the dialysis catheters were removed three weeks to three months after transplantation when renal function was stable. There were two minor complications and no infections related to the catheters. We conclude that: a) excellent transplant results can be achieved in peritoneal dialysis patients, most of whom are diabetic and receive cadaveric grafts, b) the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not a significant source of peritransplant morbidity and therefore c) peritoneal dialysis is appropriate for patients awaiting renal transplantation and should not bias against their selection for transplantation. The published literature on kidney transplantation in patients on peritoneal dialysis is sparse, suggesting that it is not, and perhaps should not be common practice to transplant these patients. This study and review of the literature was undertaken 1) to characterize peritoneal dialysis patients undergoing renal transplantation at our center, 2) to determine the results of transplantation in this group, 3) to evaluate the risk to these patients from the peritoneal dialysis catheter itself and 4) to compare our experience with the literature concerning renal transplantation of peritoneal dialysis patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 473-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah K. Al-Hwiesh ◽  
Ibrahiem Saeed Abdul-Rahman ◽  
Fahd Abdulaziz Al-Muhanna ◽  
Mohammed Hamad Al-Sulaiman ◽  
Mohammed Shami Al-Jondebi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-228
Author(s):  
Christina Nilsson ◽  
Wolfgang Sperker ◽  
Claudia Schien ◽  
Malin Isaksson ◽  
Bernd G Stegmayr

Aim: When performing acute onset dialysis after insertion of catheters for peritoneal dialysis, pain exists and tunnel infections may develop. This study investigated whether patients benefit from the use of a surgical girdle and specific dressing postoperatively to prevent pain and tunnel infections. Materials and Methods: In 85 consecutive patients, the development of tunnel infections was followed. The patients used a surgical girdle when they were in supine position from day 1 to day 3. The peritoneal dialysis catheter was fixed in a curvature avoiding stretch in the exit. A total of 53 patients participated in a retrospective questionnaire to evaluate abdominal pain within the first 3 days after surgery either with or without girdle. A visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 was used. Results: In 23 patients, data on pain both with and without the girdle could be recorded. Pain was relieved more when using the girdle versus no girdle (median day 1 3.0 vs 4.0, p < 0.001, n = 30, Wilcoxon paired). The development of tunnel infections during the latest 7-year period (exposure period 1487 months) showed a total of three episodes (one every 495 months) of which one caused a subsequent peritonitis, while the other two resolved after antibiotic therapy. Peritonitis episodes appeared at a mean of 37-month interval. Conclusion: The use a surgical girdle for 3 days postoperatively and a fixation of the peritoneal dialysis catheter in a curved loop relieves the pain and results in few tunnel infections and subsequent episodes of peritonitis.


1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-676
Author(s):  
A Vychytil ◽  
M Lorenz ◽  
B Schneider ◽  
W H Hörl ◽  
M Haag-Weber

The importance of Staphylococcus aureus as etiological agent for catheter-related infections and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients is well established. To evaluate groups at risk of developing Staphylococcus aureus infections, nasal and exit-site cultures were performed in 76 peritoneal dialysis patients monthly over a period of 3 yr. The risk of Staphylococcus aureus catheter infection was significantly higher in diabetic (group 1) and immunosuppressed (group 2) patients compared with nondiabetic and nonimmunosuppressed (group 3) patients. In diabetic patients, Staphylococcus aureus-positive nasal cultures were more frequent than positive cultures taken from the bland exit-site (73.3% versus 60.0%). On the other hand, both positive and negative exit-site cultures had a better prognostic value for Staphylococcus aureus catheter infection compared with nasal cultures. In immunosuppressed patients, both nasal and exit-site carriages were associated with a very high risk of Staphylococcus aureus catheter infection, but nasal swabs were far more often positive than swabs from the bland exit-site (72.7% versus 25.0%). However, the risk of infection was also high for non-nasal and non-exit-site carriers in this group. In nondiabetic and nonimmunosuppressed patients, the risk of Staphylococcus aureus catheter infection was increased only if two or more positive nasal cultures were detected. It is concluded that in diabetic patients, antibiotic prophylaxis should be performed in all Staphylococcus aureus exit-site carriers. All immunosuppressed patients should be treated prophylactically. In contrast, in nondiabetic and nonimmunosuppressed patients, prophylactic treatment should be considered only in nasal carriers with two or more positive cultures. The overall low peritonitis rate does not influence this prevention strategy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Hirotake Kasuga

Most of the peritoneal dialysis patients stop their peritoneal dialysis therapy and transfer to hemodialysis or kidney transplantation. In Japan, most end-stage kidney disease patients select hemodialysis after peritoneal dialysis discontinuation. Peritoneal dialysis catheter will be removed after stopping peritoneal dialysis. If peritoneal dialysis patients suffer from refractory peritonitis or severe tunnel infection, we remove the peritoneal dialysis catheter immediately. However, the causes of peritoneal dialysis discontinuation are ultrafiltration failure or peritoneal membrane dysfunction, and we have to consider the timing of peritoneal dialysis catheter removal. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis is the most important adverse event of peritoneal dialysis. And encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis often develops after stopping peritoneal dialysis. Risk factors associated with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis are high peritoneal equilibration test values, longer peritoneal dialysis period, frequent peritonitis, and so on. There is no evidence to prevent encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis completely. Therefore, we can preserve the peritoneal dialysis catheter and assess the changes of peritoneal function after peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, if patient is suspected to have high risk of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.


1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 715-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Ann Palmer ◽  
Bruce A. Kaiser ◽  
Martin S. Polinsky ◽  
Stephen P. Dunn ◽  
Caroline Braas ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 908-909
Author(s):  
Hemali Trivedi ◽  
Henkie P. Tan ◽  
Claire Morgan ◽  
Ron Shapiro ◽  
Amit Basil

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Io ◽  
Kazuaki Hara ◽  
Junichiro Nakata ◽  
Kazuhiro Sakamoto ◽  
Yasuhiko Tomino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document