Anticoagulation of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device Using Argatroban-Based Purge Solution: A Case Series

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Blum ◽  
Carolyn R. Martz ◽  
Yelena Selektor ◽  
Hassan Nemeh ◽  
Zachary R. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Optimal Dosing ◽  
Therapeutic Anticoagulation ◽  
Pump Thrombosis ◽  
Purge Flow ◽  
Biventricular Failure ◽  
Effective Use

Impella devices are percutaneously inserted ventricular assist devices which require a continuous purge solution that contains heparin to prevent pump thrombosis and device failure. We describe 2 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) supported with an Impella device utilizing an argatroban-based purge solution. Case 1 involved an 83-year-old female with biventricular failure which resulted in right ventricle Impella support. The purge solution was changed to include argatroban due to concern of device clotting in the setting of HIT. Case 2 involved a 55-year-old male with worsening cardiogenic shock which resulted in left ventricle Impella support. Due to decreased purge flow rates and concerns for clotting, argatroban was added to the purge solution. Both patients’ total argatroban regimens were monitored and adjusted by pharmacy, resulting in therapeutic anticoagulation without any major bleeding or thrombotic events. Subsequently, a protocol was designed and implemented. These case reports appear to demonstrate the safe and effective use of argatroban purge solutions for the necessary anticoagulation with an Impella device. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal dosing regimen.

Therapeutic Anticoagulation With an Ultra-Low Concentration Argatroban-Based Purge Solution for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device in Patient With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2019 ◽  
pp. 001857871988890
Author(s):  
Andrea Sikora Newsome ◽  
Ashley Taylor ◽  
Seth Garner
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Low Concentration ◽  
Failure Data ◽  
Therapeutic Anticoagulation ◽  
Pump Thrombosis ◽  
Effective Use

Purpose/Background: Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pVADs) require a continuous purge solution containing heparin to prevent pump thrombosis and device failure. Data regarding alternative options in patients who have suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are limited. Methods: In this report, we describe a 68-year-old white man with cardiogenic shock with an Impella CP device managed with a low concentration argatroban-based purge solution secondary to a suspected diagnosis of HIT. Results: The purge solution was initiated as argatroban in dextrose 10% at a concentration of 0.12 mg/mL and was subsequently decreased twice to 0.06 and 0.015 mg/mL based on the patient’s clinical course. Conclusions: This case report describes the safe and effective use of argatroban purge solution necessary for anticoagulation although further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Utilization of a Dextrose-Only Purge Solution for an LVAD in Patients With Suspected HIT: A Case Series

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002093430
Author(s):  
Riley D. Bowers ◽  
Jennifer Nowak ◽  
Dustin Bryan ◽  
Nicolas Biondi ◽  
Brock Dorsett
Keyword(s):  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Effective Option ◽  
Manufacturer Recommendation

The Impella devices are percutaneous intravascular ventricular assist devices indicated for use in patients with cardiogenic shock that occurs following acute myocardial infarction (MI) or open heart surgery. These devices must be used with a purge solution that contains heparin per manufacturer recommendation, which will prevent blood from reaching the motor causing pump thrombosis and mechanical failure. We describe the utilization of a dextrose-only purge solution plus systemic argatroban in 2 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Each case describes a patient with suspected HIT following Impella placement for cardiogenic shock post-MI that had an increased bleeding risk. In each case, pharmacy monitored and adjusted the patients’ argatroban, resulting in therapeutic anticoagulation without major bleeding or thrombotic events. These case reports demonstrate that use of a dextrose-only purge solution in the Impella device may be a safe and effective option when combined with systemic argatroban in patients with suspected or confirmed HIT who exhibit increased bleeding risk. Further research is needed to determine the optimal concentrations and duration of anticoagulation-free purge solution in these patients.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with left ventricular assist devices: case report and comprehensive review

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
María López-Gil ◽  
Adolfo Fontenla ◽  
Juan F Delgado ◽  
Daniel Rodríguez-Muñoz
Keyword(s):  
Electromagnetic Interference ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure, many of whom have been or will be implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Interaction between both devices is a matter of concern. Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) obtains its signals through subcutaneous vectors, which poses special challenges with regards to adequate performance following LVAD implantation. Case summary We describe the case of a 24-year-old man implanted with an S-ICD because of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, severe biventricular dysfunction, and self-limiting sustained ventricular tachycardias. After the implantation of a HeartMate 3™ (Left Ventricular Assist System, Abbott) several months later, the S-ICD became useless because of inappropriate sensing due to electromagnetic interference and attenuation of QRS voltage. Discussion We reviewed the reported cases in PubMed about the concomitant use of S-ICD and LVAD. Seven case reports about the performance of S-ICD in patients with an LVAD were identified, with discordant results. From these articles, we analyse the potential causes for these differing results. Pump location and operating rates in LVAD, as well as changes in the subcutaneous-electrocardiogram detected by the S-ICD after LVAD implantation are related to sensing disturbances when used in the same patient.

Blood damage in Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pump thrombosis or system thrombosis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Selmi ◽  
Wei-Che Chiu ◽  
Venkat Keshav Chivukula ◽  
Giulio Melisurgo ◽  
Jennifer Ann Beckman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Assist Device ◽  
Ventricular Assist Device ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Assist Device ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Assist Devices ◽  
Pump Thrombosis ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist

Introduction: Despite significant technical advancements in the design and manufacture of Left Ventricular Assist Devices, post-implant thrombotic and thromboembolic complications continue to affect long-term outcomes. Previous efforts, aimed at optimizing pump design as a means of reducing supraphysiologic shear stresses generated within the pump and associated prothrombotic shear-mediated platelet injury, have only partially altered the device hemocompatibility. Methods: We examined hemodynamic mechanisms that synergize with hypershear within the pump to contribute to the thrombogenic potential of the overall Left Ventricular Assist Device system. Results: Numerical simulations of blood flow in differing regions of the Left Ventricular Assist Device system, that is the diseased native left ventricle, the pump inflow cannula, the impeller, the outflow graft and the anastomosed downstream aorta, reveal that prothrombotic hemodynamic conditions might occur at these specific sites. Furthermore, we show that beyond hypershear, additional hemodynamic abnormalities exist within the pump, which may elicit platelet activation, such as recirculation zones and stagnant platelet trajectories. We also provide evidences that particular Left Ventricular Assist Device implantation configurations and specific post-implant patient management strategies, such as those allowing aortic valve opening, are more hemodynamically favorable and reduce the thrombotic risk. Conclusion: We extend the perspective of pump thrombosis secondary to the supraphysiologic shear stress environment of the pump to one of Left Ventricular Assist Device system thrombosis, raising the importance of comprehensive characterization of the different prothrombotic risk factors of the total system as the target to achieve enhanced hemocompatibility and improved clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document