Physician compliance with quality and patient safety regulations: The role of perceived enforcement approaches and commitment

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-112
Author(s):  
Ulrike Weske ◽  
Paul Boselie ◽  
Elizabeth van Rensen ◽  
Margriet Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Control Systems ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Quality Improvements ◽  
Physician Compliance ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Quality And Patient Safety

The implementation of a quality and patient safety accreditation system is crucial for hospitals. Although control systems—such as accreditation—can contribute to quality improvements, they also run the risk of unintended consequences. As a result, ways should be found to avoid or reduce these undesirable consequences. This study aims to answer this call by exploring the association of different approaches to the enforcement of rules (punishment, based on monitoring and threats of sanctions; and persuasion, based on dialog and suggestion) with compliance. To test the relation between perceived enforcement and compliance, this study used survey data collected from medical specialists (N = 92) of a large academic medical center. The findings indicate that the same system is interpreted differently and that only a perceived persuasion approach is related to higher levels of compliance. This effect is fully mediated by affective commitment. No direct or indirect effects on compliance were found for a perceived coercive approach. These results suggest that control systems can be perceived in different ways and that the implementation of a control system does therefore not automatically lead to negative and unintended outcomes.

Patient Safety Trilogy: Perspectives from Clinical Engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabella Gieras ◽  
Paul Sherman ◽  
Dennis Minsent
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Engineering ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Healthcare Technology ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Clinical Engineers

This article examines the role a clinical engineering or healthcare technology management (HTM) department can play in promoting patient safety from three different perspectives: a community hospital, a national government health system, and an academic medical center. After a general overview, Izabella Gieras from Huntington Hospital in Pasadena, CA, leads off by examining the growing role of human factors in healthcare technology, and describing how her facility uses clinical simulations in medical equipment evaluations. A section by Paul Sherman follows, examining patient safety initiatives from the perspective of the Veterans Health Administration with a focus on hazard alerts and recalls. Dennis Minsent from Oregon Health & Science University writes about patient safety from an academic healthcare perspective, and details how clinical engineers can engage in multidisciplinary safety opportunities.

Resident and RN perceptions of the impact of a medical emergency team on education and patient safety in an academic medical center*

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 3091-3096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babak Sarani ◽  
Seema Sonnad ◽  
Meredith R. Bergey ◽  
Joanne Phillips ◽  
Mary Kate Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Impact

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators and Mortality in Surgical Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 801-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Ramanathan ◽  
Patricia Leavell ◽  
Luke G. Wolfe ◽  
Therese M. Duane
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Healthcare Research ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Patient Safety Indicators ◽  
Academic Medical

Patient safety indicators (PSI), developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, use administrative billing data to measure and compare patient safety events at medical centers. We retrospectively examined whether PSIs accurately reflect patients’ risk of mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) requirements at an academic medical center. Surgical patient records with PSIs were reviewed between October 2011 and September 2012 at our urban academic medical center. Primary outcomes studied included mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU requirements. Subset analysis was performed for each PSI and its association with the outcome measures. PSIs were more common among surgical patients who died as compared with those alive at discharge (35.3 vs 2.7 PSIs/100 patients, P < 0.01). Although patients who died with PSIs had shorter hospital courses, they had a significantly greater ICU requirement than those without a PSI (96.0 vs 61.1%, P < 0.01) and patients who were alive at discharge (96.0 vs 48.0%, P < 0.01). The most frequently associated PSIs with mortality were postoperative metabolic derangements (41.7%), postoperative sepsis (38.5%), and pressure ulcers (33.3%). PSIs occur at a higher frequency in surgical patients who die and are associated with increased ICU requirements.

Comparing successful insertions, dwell time, reinsertions and the costs of supplies between integrated and simple short peripheral catheters

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110548
Author(s):  
Jonathan D Cura
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Dwell Time ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Background: Along with the challenges to strengthen patient safety in the use of short peripheral catheters (SPCs), various studies have been conducted in the past to explore differences between two main types of SPCs—integrated SPC (ISPC) and simple SPC (SSPC) in terms of clinical performance. The accumulated evidence from the literature lean toward the benefits of ISPC use in preventing complications leading to longer dwell time and more economical savings than SSPC use. The study aimed to compare ISPC and SSPC in terms of first-attempt successful insertions, number of attempts before successful insertion, perceived ease of insertion, dwell time, reinsertion rate, reasons for removal, and costs of supplies used for the insertions. Furthermore, it aimed to verify whether the previous results of referenced work in the use of ISPC were similar, and its use provided more foreseeable benefit for patient safety and cost-efficiency. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in a 650-bed tertiary academic medical center in the Philippines. Eligible participants were adult patients who were required SPC for at least 72 h by the physician. Using inferential statistics, comparisons were done among adult patients with integrated ( n = 350) and simple ( n = 350) SPC. Comparisons were also made according to insertion site and gauge of SPC. Results: The successful first-attempt insertions did not vary significantly at around 80% in both groups ( p = 0.428). No significant differences were found in terms of attempts before successful insertion ( p = 0.677), dwell time ( p = 0.144), reinsertions ( p = 0.934), and reasons for removal ( p = 0.424). Meanwhile, comparable differences were noted in terms of perceived ease of insertion ( p < 0.001) and cost of supplies used during the insertions ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: ISPCs can yield the same results with that of SSPCs while being easier to use and less costly.

scholarly journals Establishment of a Pharmacogenetics Service Focused on Optimizing Existing Pharmacogenetic Testing at a Large Academic Health Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Amy L. Pasternak ◽  
Kristen M. Ward ◽  
Mohammad B. Ateya ◽  
Hae Mi Choe ◽  
Amy N. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Academic Health ◽  
Implementation Processes ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Multiple Groups ◽  
Test Ordering

Multiple groups have described strategies for clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) that often include internal laboratory tests that are specifically developed for their implementation needs. However, many institutions are not able to follow this practice and instead must utilize external laboratories to obtain PGx testing results. As each external laboratory might have different ordering and reporting workflows, consistent reporting and storing of PGx results within the medical record can be a challenge. This might result in patient safety concerns as important PGx information might not be easily identifiable at the point of current or future prescribing. Herein, we describe initial PGx clinical implementation efforts at a large academic medical center, focusing on optimizing three different test ordering workflows and two distinct result reporting strategies. From this, we identified common issues such as variable reporting location and structure of PGx results, as well as duplicate PGx testing. We identified several opportunities to optimize our current processes, including—(1) PGx laboratory stewardship, (2) increasing visibility of PGx tests, and (3) clinician and patient education. Key to the success was the importance of engaging clinician, informatics, and pathology stakeholders, as we developed interventions to improve our PGX implementation processes.

Implementation of Pharmacy Executive Quality and Safety Walkrounds at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 001857872110101
Author(s):  
Yazed Saleh Alsowaida ◽  
Mary P. Kovacevic ◽  
Caryn Belisle ◽  
Michael C. Cotugno ◽  
Tom Cooley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Quality Improvements ◽  
Frontline Staff ◽  
Pharmacy Department ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Service Areas ◽  
The Impact

Background: Executive Quality and Safety WalkRounds (EWRs) is a tool that engages department leadership in discussion with the front-line employees to solicit feedback to improve quality and safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of pharmacy department specific EWRs on quality and safety at a tertiary academic medical center. Method: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis conducted at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between November 2016 and November 2019. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of EWRs conducted every other month throughout various service areas and satellites of the pharmacy department. Data evaluated included the number of EWRs conducted, the specific areas visited, the total number of action items recommended by the staff, along with the total number of action items that were completed or remained in process. Results: During the study period, 17 visits were completed in 12 different BWH pharmacy sub-departments. A total of 98 operational, technological, and environmental action items were recommended by staff to improve quality and safety. Of the 98 action items documented, 95 (96.9%) were completed by time of our analysis. Conclusion: Pharmacy department EWRs are an important and systematic process of communication between the pharmacy leadership and frontline staff. Pharmacy department EWRs have resulted in safety and quality improvements at different levels in the pharmacy department. The EWRs program at the pharmacy department was effective in identifying and completing safety initiatives to improve the safety culture of the department.

scholarly journals Risk of ionizing radiation exposure from CT scans in the Neuro ICU - a patient safety blind spot?

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2489
Author(s):  
Avinash B. Kumar ◽  
Roy C. Neeley
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ct Studies

Introduction: The exposure to ionizing radiation has increased significantly with the wide availability of computed tomography (CT) scans and portable imaging technology. We examine the pattern of use of inpatient diagnostic imaging and radiation exposure in the neuro-intensive care unit (Neuro ICU, N-ICU) patient population at a large academic medical center. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients admitted to the Neuro ICU at our academic medical center from January 1 to December 31, 2013. The number and type of CT studies was collected, and the corresponding estimated radiation dose was calculated. We limited the evaluation to CT scans, which accounts for the majority of radiation exposure. Data were electronically collected and cross-referenced to the patients’ electronic medical records (EMR) and radiology records. Radiation dose estimates were calculated based on published reference values and conversion factors (CT head (2mSv)), CT angiography of the head and neck (7-10 mSv), Ct Chest /Abd/pelvis ( 10 mSv), CT cerebral perfusion analysis (3.3 mSv). Results: In the calendar year 2013, we had a total of 2353 admission encounters (F=1078). The mean age on admission was 56.55Y ± 16.7. The mean length of ICU stay was 6.3 days. Mechanical ventilation was initiated on 420 patients with a mean length on mechanical ventilation 5.09 days. 2028 CT scans were completed of which approximately 60% were head CT without contrast (n=1209). 379 patients had multiple CT studies. The mean number of studies was 3.8 ± 2. The number of patients with more thanthree3 studies during their ICU stay was 159.  The maximum number of studies on a single patient was 21. Conclusion: Patients in the Neuro ICU are at a risk for significant exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiation exposure must be factored into the culture of quality and patient safety in the ICU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document