scholarly journals The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1742-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica J. Boothby ◽  
Gus Cooney ◽  
Gillian M. Sandstrom ◽  
Margaret S. Clark

Having conversations with new people is an important and rewarding part of social life. Yet conversations can also be intimidating and anxiety provoking, and this makes people wonder and worry about what their conversation partners really think of them. Are people accurate in their estimates? We found that following interactions, people systematically underestimated how much their conversation partners liked them and enjoyed their company, an illusion we call the liking gap. We observed the liking gap as strangers got acquainted in the laboratory, as first-year college students got to know their dorm mates, and as formerly unacquainted members of the general public got to know each other during a personal development workshop. The liking gap persisted in conversations of varying lengths and even lasted for several months, as college dorm mates developed new relationships. Our studies suggest that after people have conversations, they are liked more than they know.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey L. Rocha ◽  
M. Dolores Cimini ◽  
Angelina X. Diaz-Myers ◽  
Matthew P. Martens ◽  
Estela M. Rivero ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrell A Hicks ◽  
Daniel Bustamante ◽  
Kaitlin E Bountress ◽  
Amy Adkins ◽  
Dace S Svikis ◽  
...  

Objective: To examine the prevalence and correlates of lifetime cannabis use (i.e., experimental [use 1-5 times] and non-experimental [use ≥ 6 times]) in relation to demographics, interpersonal trauma (IPT), and alcohol and nicotine use.Participants: A large (n = 9,889) representative sample of college students at an urban college campus in the southeastern part of the United States.Methods: Participants were 4 cohorts of first-year college students who completed measures of demographic variables, cannabis, alcohol, nicotine, and IPT. Associations were estimated using multinomial logistic regressions.Results: The prevalence of lifetime cannabis use was 45.5%. Specifically, 28.1% reported non-experimental cannabis use and 17.4% reported experimental cannabis use. Race, cohort, nicotine, and IPT were associated with experimental and non-experimental cannabis use. Additionally, alcohol and sex were associated with non-experimental cannabis use.Conclusions: Results show that cannabis use is prevalent among college students and is associated with race, IPT, and other substance use.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel R. Grossbard ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Irene Markman Geisner ◽  
David Atkins ◽  
Anne E. Ray ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
António M. Diniz ◽  
Sonia Alfonso ◽  
Alexandra M. Araújo ◽  
Manuel Deaño ◽  
Alexandra R. Costa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Shadick ◽  
Faedra Backus Dagirmanjian ◽  
Leora Trub ◽  
Heather Dawson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document