The happiness imperative: Exploring how women narrate depression and anxiety during pregnancy

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra A Staneva ◽  
Britta Wigginton

This article explores how women account for their experiences of pregnancy distress in light of cultural imperatives to be the perfect, happy mother. Our analysis is based on the accounts of 18 Australian women, interviewed during pregnancy on the basis of their reports of experiencing depression and/or anxiety. Working within a feminist discursive framework, we focus on the discourses that informed (and threatened) women’s positions as a good mother. In particular, we focus on the discourses women relied on to explain their distress and the discursive strategies they used in the construction of their (“distressed”) maternal identity(ies). We ask how women articulate and label distress, and with what rhetorical effects. Our analysis explores how women’s experiences of negative moods and distress were in direct opposition to cultural imperatives for mothers to stay happy and positive during pregnancy and beyond, posing rhetorical challenges to women’s accounts and hence their capacity to make meaning of their (negative) experiences. Three discursive strategies are explored: distancing from the depressed self, speaking between/around/without words, and in search of a balance. We close by considering the implications of the complex ways in which women account for idealised motherhood and how this serves to oppress vulnerable women.

2020 ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
Patricia Hamilton

This chapter begins with an analysis of the slogan 'breast is best', which is considered a universal refrain that captures state and public attitudes towards breastfeeding. It looks at the interviews with women that expressed broad support for breastfeeding in varying degrees of individual success and described it as the normative practice of the good mother. It also examines the support for breastfeeding and the tensions it creates for women as they invoke the language of nature to justify its superiority, account for breastfeeding failures, and risk breastfeeding for too long. The chapter explores women's experiences of breastfeeding as evidence of the diversity of socioeconomic circumstances. It expands the predominant thinking around black women's breastfeeding experiences beyond claims that they reject breastfeeding for its risky proximity to nature.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1022-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret R. Rogers ◽  
Meryl Sirmans

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie R. Ancis ◽  
Trish Raque-Bogdan ◽  
Natasha Gardner ◽  
Tameka Jackson

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-139
Author(s):  
Mary M. Valmas ◽  
Stephany J. Himrich ◽  
Kate M. Finn

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-441
Author(s):  
Tiffany L. Marcantonio ◽  
Malachi Willis ◽  
Kristen N. Jozkowski ◽  
Zoë D. Peterson ◽  
Terry Humphreys

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document