Sample size considerations for paired experimental design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 589-598
Author(s):  
Hong Zhu ◽  
Xiaohan Xu ◽  
Chul Ahn

Paired experimental design is widely used in clinical and health behavioral studies, where each study unit contributes a pair of observations. Investigators often encounter incomplete observations of paired outcomes in the data collected. Some study units contribute complete pairs of observations, while the others contribute either pre- or post-intervention observations. Statistical inference for paired experimental design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes has been extensively studied in literature. However, sample size method for such study design is sparsely available. We derive a closed-form sample size formula based on the generalized estimating equation approach by treating the incomplete observations as missing data in a linear model. The proposed method properly accounts for the impact of mixed structure of observed data: a combination of paired and unpaired outcomes. The sample size formula is flexible to accommodate different missing patterns, magnitude of missingness, and correlation parameter values. We demonstrate that under complete observations, the proposed generalized estimating equation sample size estimate is the same as that based on the paired t-test. In the presence of missing data, the proposed method would lead to a more accurate sample size estimate comparing with the crude adjustment. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the finite-sample performance of the generalized estimating equation sample size formula. A real application example is presented for illustration.

Biometrics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott L. Zeger ◽  
Kung-Yee Liang ◽  
Paul S. Albert

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kewei Chen ◽  
Xiaojuan Guo ◽  
Rong Pan ◽  
Chengjie Xiong ◽  
Danielle J. Harvey ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Justine Shults ◽  
Sarah J. Ratcliffe ◽  
Mary Leonard

Quasi–least squares (QLS) is an alternative method for estimating the correlation parameters within the framework of the generalized estimating equation (gee) approach for analyzing correlated cross-sectional and longitudinal data. This article summarizes the development of qls that occurred in several reports and describes its use with the user-written program xtqls in Stata. Also, it demonstrates the following advantages of qls: (1) qls allows some correlation structures that have not yet been implemented in the framework of gee, (2) qls can be applied as an alternative to gee if the gee estimate is infeasible, and (3) qls uses the same estimating equation for estimation of β as gee; as a result, qls can involve programs already available for gee. In particular, xtqls calls the Stata program xtgee within an iterative approach that alternates between updating estimates of the correlation parameter α and then using xtgee to solve the gee for β at the current estimate of α. The benefit of this approach is that after xtqls, all the usual postregression estimation commands are readily available to the user.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document