An Unfamiliar “Common” Skin Disease: Poison Ivy Allergic Contact Dermatitis

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
KH Lee ◽  
JKK Ho ◽  
KM Lam ◽  
WY Wu
1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G Marks ◽  
Joseph F Fowler ◽  
Elizabeth F Sherertz ◽  
Robert L Rietschel

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Efenina Ginting ◽  
Damayanti Damayanti ◽  
Deasy Fetarayani ◽  
Afif Nurul Hidayati

Background: Contact dermatitis (CD) is a skin inflammatory caused by allergen or irritant that generates public health impact. CD is classified into two types, based on its etiological perspective, namely allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) due to a hypersensitivity type IV reaction and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), which is a non-immunological reaction. Purpose: To determine the profile of CD patients at Dermatology and Venereology Outpatients Unit of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital Surabaya in January 2018 – December 2019. Methods: A retrospective study by observation and recording data. The results of the data recap were then processed using Microsoft Excel to obtain conclusions.  Result: The results obtained were ACD (61.9%) and ICD (38.1%), aged 26-45 years (32.7%), female (79.3%). The most frequent occupation was housewives (25.3%), followed by private employees (24.5%). The most suspected causative substance was cosmetic (47.7%). The most common skin disease history was food allergy (11%), followed by drug allergy (2.8%), and atopic dermatitis (2.3%). The most frequent manifestation was acute (69.8%), with the most clinical presentation was erythematous macules (35%). Most therapies were given in combination (73.6%), with antihistamines (61%) and topical corticosteroids (49.2%) were the most prescription drug. Conclusion: ACD was more common than ICD, mostly in a female, dominated in the 26-45 years old. Housewife was the most occupational. Cosmetic was the most suspected causative substance. Food allergy was the most skin disease history. Acute was the most frequent manifestation. Erythematous macules were the most clinical presentation. Antihistamine and corticosteroid are the most common drug in combination therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-187
Author(s):  
Malena Gergovska ◽  
Kristina Semkova ◽  
Jana Kazandjieva ◽  
Nikolay Tsankov

Abstract A large number of contact allergic reactions to benzocaine have been reported since its introduction to the pharmaceutical market as an active ingredient in different over-the-counter anesthetic ointments. Benzocaine is used as a key ingredient in many pharmaceuticals, such as products for oral ulcers, wound and burn preparations, sunburn remedies, hemorrhoidal preparations, oral and gingival products, sore throat sprays/lozenges, callous and wart remedies, creams for treatment of poison ivy dermatitis, tooth ache and denture irritation products. We present a 56-year-old Caucasian male with chronic rash, accompanied by intense itching in the perianal area. The lesions occurred two months earlier and the patient was treated with a wide range of topical antifungals, antibiotics and corticosteroids, with temporary improvement. The skin lesions were consistent with chronic allergic contact dermatitis. The patient denied using any topical preparations other than those prescribed by his dermatologist. Patch testing with the European baseline series was performed. A strongly positive reaction to benzocaine was identified on reading days 2 and 3. Targeted history showed intermittent use of benzocaine anti-hemorrhoidal cream to treat concomitant hemorrhoids. Benzocaine was discontinued and treatment with methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% was initiated, resulting in significant improvement. No relapse was observed at 3-month follow-up. In conclusion, patients with confirmed benzocaine allergy should pay special attention to product labels and avoid products that contain benzocaine and its related substances. All products labelled as “anaesthetic” or “caine” should be suspected of containing benzocaine or related compounds. Patient education and awareness are critical to avoid further episodes and relapses.


1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
James G Marks ◽  
Joseph F. Fowler ◽  
Elizabeth Sherertz ◽  
Robert L. Rietschel

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan J. Schlichte ◽  
Rajani Katta

Recalcitrant dermatitis, such as that of the hands, face, or genitals, may be due to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from ingredients in seemingly innocuous personal care products. Rising rates of allergy have been noted due to the preservative methylisothiazolinone (MI). This preservative is commonly found in skin and hair care products, especially wipes. This study evaluated the use of MI in products specifically marketed for babies and children and examined the associated marketing terms of such products. Ingredients of skin care products specifically marketed for babies and children were surveyed at two major retailers. Of 152 products surveyed, 30 products contained MI. Categories of products surveyed included facial or body wipes, antibacterial hand wipes, hair products, soaps, bubble baths, moisturizers, and sunscreens. Facial or body wipes and hair products were the categories with the greatest number of MI-containing products. MI-containing products were manufactured by a number of popular brands. Of note, products marketed as “gentle,” “sensitive,” “organic,” or “hypoallergenic” often contained MI, thus emphasizing the importance of consumer scrutiny of product choices. These findings reinforce the importance of educating parents and providing consumer decision-making advice regarding common skin care products, in order to help prevent ACD in children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document