scholarly journals Comparison of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test, and Direct Agglutination Test for Detecting Toxoplasma Gondii Antibodies in Naturally Aborted Ovine Fetuses

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheryl L. Seefeldt ◽  
Clyde A. Kirkbride ◽  
Jitender P. Dubey

Results obtained in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFA), and a modified direct agglutination test (MAT) for Toxoplasma gondii antibodies from examination of fetal fluids from 377 aborted ovine fetuses were compared. Sixty-seven samples were positive by MAT (titers 1:16 to > 1:65,536), 58 were positive by ELISA, and 62 were positive by immunoglobulin G-IFA. The MAT was preferred because it required less time, labor, and special equipment. It was simple to run, could be done on serum from any species without modification, and it was more effective than the IFA for detecting toxoplasma antibodies in severely autolyzed fetuses. No advantage was found in determining immunoglobulin M antibodies in ovine fetal sera.

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea E. Packham ◽  
Karen W. Sverlow ◽  
Patricia A. Conrad ◽  
Emily F. Loomis ◽  
Joan D. Rowe ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Current serologic tests used to detect antibodies to Neospora caninum require species-specific secondary antibodies, limiting the number of species that can be tested. In order to examine a wide variety of animal species that may be infected with N. caninum, a modified direct agglutination test (N-MAT) similar to the Toxoplasma gondii modified direct agglutination test (T-MAT) was developed. This test measures the direct agglutination of parasites by N. caninum-specific antibodies in serum, thus eliminating the need for secondary host-specific anti-isotype sera. The N-MAT was compared to the indirect fluorescent-antibody test (IFAT) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a “gold standard” serum panel from species for which secondary antibodies were available (n = 547). All positive samples tested were from animals with histologically confirmed infections. Up to 16 different species were tested. The N-MAT gave a higher sensitivity (100%) and specificity (97%) than the ELISA (74 and 94%, respectively) and had a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity than the IFAT (98 and 99%, respectively). The reduced specificity of the N-MAT was due to false-positive reactions in testing fetal fluids with particulate matter or severely hemolyzed serum. Overall, the N-MAT proved to be highly sensitive and specific for both naturally and experimentally infected animals, highly reproducible between and within readers, easy to use on large sample sizes without requiring special equipment, and useful in testing serum from any species without modification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document