Health-Care Utilization After Hospice Enrollment in Patients With Heart Failure and Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith A. MacKenzie ◽  
Alexandra Hanlon

This study aimed to examine the role of diagnosis in health-care utilization patterns after hospice enrollment. Using 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey data from hospice patients with heart failure (n = 311) and cancer (n = 946), we analyzed emergency service use and discharge to hospital via logistic regression pre- and postpropensity score matching. Prematching, patients with heart failure had twice the odds of emergency services use than patients with cancer ( P < .001) and twice the odds of discharge to hospital ( P = .02). Differences were reduced postmatching for emergency service use (odds ratio [OR]: 1.6, P = .05) and eliminated for discharge to hospital (OR: 1.32, P = .45). Health-care utilization correlates included diagnosis, place of care, and advance directives. Attention to the unique needs of patients with heart failure is needed, along with improved advanced care planning.

Author(s):  
Meredith A MacKenzie

Introduction: Emergency service use should be almost non-existent among hospice patients, as hospice is intended to provide for all care needs at the end of life. Cancer patients comprise almost 50% of hospice patients nation-wide and have relatively low rates of emergency service use while on hospice care. Hospice enrollment has been steadily increasing among patients with heart failure, but concerns have been raised about how well hospice care meets these patients’ needs. Emergency service use is one indicator of how well heart failure patients’ needs are met on hospice. Objective: To explore whether emergency service use is higher among heart failure patients on hospice as compared to cancer patients on hospice and reasons for this potential disparity. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey (NHHCS). Only hospice patients with heart failure (n=311) and hospice patients with breast, prostate, colon or lung cancer (n=946) were included in the analysis. Emergency service use was measured by response to NHHCS question 73 (“did the patient use one or more types of emergent care?”) and includes the use of both emergency room and outpatient (urgicenter) services. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between emergency service use and diagnosis. All analyses were adjusted for hospice length of stay, patient age, race/ethnicity, caregiver relationship, number of comorbidities, functional status, cognitive function and place of care. Results: Subjects (M age 75.3, SD 12.68) were 51% female and 89% white. The rate of emergency service use was 9.6% among the cancer patients and 17.36% among heart failure patients. Heart failure patients were almost two times more likely to utilize emergency services (OR 1.96, p<.002). Among the covariates examined, only hospice length of stay was significantly associated with emergency service use (p<.000), but did not appear to make a clinically significant difference (OR 1.003). Conclusions: While this study lends support to the hypothesis that heart failure patients suffer unmet care needs while on hospice, the nature of these unmet needs should be further explored. Outcome disparities have previously been suggested to be due to differences in age, comorbidities and functional status between the heart failure and cancer populations, but this study does not support that hypothesis. Hospice care plans unique to the heart failure patient should be considered.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Hanyu Ni ◽  
Kendra Wise ◽  
Warren Toy ◽  
Donna Burgess ◽  
Deirdre J. Nauman ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 1740-1747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline W. Lucas ◽  
Daheia J. Barr-Anderson ◽  
Raynard S. Kington

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Canan Karatekin ◽  
Brandon Almy ◽  
Susan Marshall Mason ◽  
Iris Borowsky ◽  
Andrew Barnes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan L Auener ◽  
Toine E P Remers ◽  
Simone A van Dulmen ◽  
Gert P Westert ◽  
Rudolf B Kool ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Chronic heart failure accounts for approximately 1%-2% of health care expenditures in most developed countries. These costs are primarily driven by hospitalizations and comorbidities. Telemonitoring has been proposed to reduce the number of hospitalizations and decrease the cost of treatment for patients with heart failure. However, the effects of telemonitoring on health care utilization remain unclear. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to study the effect of telemonitoring programs on health care utilization and costs in patients with chronic heart failure. We assess the effect of telemonitoring on hospitalizations, emergency department visits, length of stay, hospital days, nonemergency department visits, and health care costs. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies on noninvasive telemonitoring and health care utilization. We included studies published between January 2010 and August 2020. For each study, we extracted the reported data on the effect of telemonitoring on health care utilization. We used <i>P</i>&lt;.05 and CIs not including 1.00 to determine whether the effect was statistically significant. RESULTS We included 16 randomized controlled trials and 13 nonrandomized studies. Inclusion criteria, population characteristics, and outcome measures differed among the included studies. Most studies showed no effect of telemonitoring on health care utilization. The number of hospitalizations was significantly reduced in 38% (9/24) of studies, whereas emergency department visits were reduced in 13% (1/8) of studies. An increase in nonemergency department visits (6/9, 67% of studies) was reported. Health care costs showed ambiguous results, with 3 studies reporting an increase in health care costs, 3 studies reporting a reduction, and 4 studies reporting no significant differences. Health care cost reductions were realized through a reduction in hospitalizations, whereas increases were caused by the high costs of the telemonitoring program or increased health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS Most telemonitoring programs do not show clear effects on health care utilization measures, except for an increase in nonemergency outpatient department visits. This may be an unwarranted side effect rather than a prerequisite for effective telemonitoring. The consequences of telemonitoring on nonemergency outpatient visits should receive more attention from regulators, payers, and providers. This review further demonstrates the high clinical and methodological heterogeneity of telemonitoring programs. This should be taken into account in future meta-analyses aimed at identifying the effective components of telemonitoring programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document