Effect of Acetaminophen on the Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Sepsis

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Asad E. Patanwala ◽  
Ohoud Aljuhani ◽  
Hussain Bakhsh ◽  
Brian L. Erstad

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) commonly occurs in patients with sepsis. Acetaminophen (APAP) has been shown to inhibit lipid peroxidation and, thus, may be renal protective in patients with sepsis. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of APAP on AKI in patients with sepsis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at 2 affiliated academic medical centers in the United States. Adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of severe sepsis were included. Patients were categorized based on whether APAP was received within the first 7 days of hospitalization (APAP or no APAP groups). The primary outcome measure was occurrence or increase in AKI stage from admission. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: There were 238 patients who were included in the study cohort. Of these, 122 received APAP and 116 did not receive APAP. AKI or exacerbation occurred in 16.4% (n = 20) of patients in the APAP group and 19.8% (n = 23) of patients in the no APAP group ( P = 0.505). After adjusting for the most important confounders, there was no significant association between APAP use and AKI (odds ratio = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.6-2.4; P = 0.639). Conclusion: APAP use in critically ill patients with sepsis may not reduce the occurrence or exacerbation of AKI.

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A Bliss ◽  
Carol A Vitellas ◽  
Nayanika Challa ◽  
Vivien H Lee

Introduction: The lower proportion of women at the rank of full professor compared to men has been documented in nearly all specialties. Women are under-represented in academic stroke neurology, but there is limited data. Methods: We reviewed all 160 U.S. medical schools and the associated medical centers for vascular neurologists. An internet search of stroke team websites and neurology department websites was performed from August 1, 2020 to August 25, 2020. We included 117 academic medical centers that had at least 1 vascular neurologist on faculty. We included vascular neurology ABPN certified or board eligible (fellowship-trained) neurologists. Data was collected on sex, academic rank, and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) certification status. ABPN board certification status was verified on the ABPN verify CERT website. Social medical women’s neurology groups were also queried for names of women full professor to cross check. Results: Among 540 academic ABPN vascular neurologists, 182 (33.8%) were women and 358 (66.3%) were men. Among academic ranks, women made up 108/269 (40.1%) of Assistant professors, 49/137 (35.8%) of Associate professors, and 25/134 (18.8%) of full professors. Twenty two academic centers had vascular neurology female professors on faculty, compared to 70 academic centers with male full professors on faculty. Twenty nine academic centers had multiple male professors on faculty compared to only 3 centers with multiple female full professors. Among women, 108 (59.3%) were assistant professor, 49 (26.7%) were associate professor, 25 (13.7%) were full professor. Among men, 161 (45.0%) were assistant professor, 88 (24.6%) were associate professor, and 109 (30.5%) were professor. There was a significant difference between academic rank based upon sex (p <0.0001). Conclusion: Among academic medical centers in the United States, significant sex differences were observed in academic faculty rank for ABPN vascular neurologists, with women less likely than men to be full professors. Further study is warranted to address the gender gap in the field of stroke.


2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 1208-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Aaronson ◽  
Sharon Abramovitz ◽  
Richard Smiley ◽  
Virginia Tangel ◽  
Ruth Landau

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Daniel K. Podolsky

The forces that are reshaping the delivery of health care through much of the developed world are especially acute within academic centers that carry the responsibility for delivering that care while advancing medical knowledge and ensuring well-trained physicians. Gastroenterology will not be spared any of those forces, and in some ways represents the leading edge of their impact. Though the dynamics vary within the context of the health-care delivery and scientific enterprise of individual countries, common elements are demands for greater accountability and transparency in how academic medical centers demonstrate their value while assuring broad access to their expertise. In the United States, underlying many forms of change in the payment scheme are the common elements that will increasingly place the risk for the cost of care on providers rather than on the payers, be it government or private, as has historically been true. At the same time, academic medical centers, with gastroenterology responsible for addressing the burden of digestive diseases, must remain the stem cells for health care integrating all their missions and providing the foundation of medical advances which will ultimately improve human welfare. What will academic gastroenterology units look like if they are able to effectively respond to these forces? Gastrointestinal (GI) divisions and faculty will own new roles including responsibility for system success in caring for patients. They will evolve their training programs to provide the next generation with skills needed to succeed, including the discipline of system improvement, team leadership and others. And there will be new models that will drive the organization of research that are not as conventionally self-contained within the gastroenterology units, but fostering research teams that have hubs and spokes. The vitality of GI divisions will depend on the willingness to seize ownership of the new value proposition of disease management ensuring that each patient achieves the best outcome with the most effective use of resources and endeavor within their systems to capture some of that value to invest in their training and research missions. In the course of that evolution, gastroenterology will be well served by rebalancing the dependence on existing modalities. If procedural gastroenterology becomes the sole value proposition, it will lead to an increasingly narrow view of the field.


1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1369-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Anderson ◽  
Rolla B. Hill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document