Parenteral and Oral Fluconazole for Acute Cryptococcal Meningitis in Aids: Experience with Thirteen Patients

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 876-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Stern ◽  
Nancy A. Pietroski ◽  
R. Michael Buckley ◽  
Michael N. Braffman ◽  
Michael G. Rinaldi

OBJECTIVE: Cryptococcus neoformans infections of the central nervous system affect up to ten percent of AIDS patients. Standard therapy with amphotericin B with or without 5-flucytosine has a high rate of failure, relapse, and toxicity. Fluconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent available in both oral and intravenous forms that has shown efficacy in the primary and maintenance treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients. In this open, noncomparative trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous fluconazole followed by oral fluconazole in the treatment of acute cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients. METHODS: Thirteen AIDS patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis, or relapse after successful primary therapy, received 400 mg of intravenous fluconazole daily for 12–16 days followed by oral fluconazole 400 mg/d for the duration of primary therapy. If cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures converted to negative within 32 weeks of treatment, the fluconazole dose was decreased to 200 mg/d as maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Fluconazole therapy was successful in six patients (46 percent) and unsuccessful in seven (54 percent). Of the seven patients considered unsuccessful, one demonstrated clinical improvement but remained CSF-culture positive, five were clinical failures and were switched to amphotericin B therapy, and one died after two weeks secondary to cryptococcal meningitis. No patient experienced any adverse reactions necessitating discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this small group of patients, moderate doses of parenteral and oral fluconazole for acute cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients demonstrated failure rates similar to those reported in other studies with fluconazole and with amphotericin B. As there was no difference in initial Karnofsky scores or the severity of disease in treatment successes versus failures, it is difficult to determine who might respond to fluconazole as initial therapy or who should be treated initially with another agent. Further studies and clinical experience are needed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 031-041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan S. Schwartz ◽  
Carol A. Kauffman

AbstractBlastomycosis is a serious fungal disease of humans and other mammals caused by environmentally acquired infection with geographically restricted, thermally dimorphic fungi belonging to the genus Blastomyces. The genetic and geographic diversity of these pathogens is greater than previously appreciated. In addition to Blastomyces dermatitidis and the cryptic species Blastomyces gilchristii, which cause blastomycosis in mid-western and various eastern areas of North America, atypical blastomycosis is occasionally caused by Blastomyces helicus in western parts of North America and Blastomyces percursus in Africa. Blastomycosis is acquired by inhalation of the conidia that are produced in the mold phase; in the lungs, temperature-dependent transformation occurs to the yeast phase. In this form, the organism is phagocytized by macrophages and can spread hematogenously to various organs causing disseminated infection. Pulmonary disease is most common and varies from mild, self-limited infection to severe, potentially fatal adult respiratory distress syndrome. Disseminated infection is manifested primarily by skin lesions, but many other organs can be involved. Diagnosis is established by growth of the organism in culture; however, a tentative diagnosis can be made quickly by histopathological identification of the classic yeast form in tissues or by finding Blastomyces antigen in urine or serum. Blastomycosis is treated initially with amphotericin B when the disease is severe, involves the central nervous system, or the host is immunosuppressed. Itraconazole is recommended for primary therapy in mild-to-moderate infection and for step-down therapy after initial amphotericin B treatment. Voriconazole and posaconazole can be used for patients in whom itraconazole is not tolerated.


1996 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Joly ◽  
C. Geoffary ◽  
J. Reynes ◽  
C. Goujard ◽  
D. Méchali ◽  
...  

AIDS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan de Gans ◽  
Peter Portegies ◽  
Germ Tiessens ◽  
Jan Karel M. Eeftinck Schattenkerk ◽  
Chris J. van Boxtel ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coleman Rotstein ◽  
Michel Laverdière ◽  
Anne Marciniak ◽  
Farzad Ali

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a serious fungal infection that affects immunocompromised patients. The Global Comparative Aspergillosis study demonstrated that voriconazole, a new broad-spectrum triazole, had better responses and improved survival compared with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (CAB) and other licensed antifungal therapy (OLAT) for the treatment of definite or probable aspergillosis.OBJECTIVES: To compare costs and outcomes of voriconazole and CAB for the treatment of definite or probable aspergillosis in Canada.METHODS: A cost-consequence decision tree model was designed to reflect the treatment pathways used in clinical practice when using voriconazole or CAB as primary therapy for IA. Therapy included initial treatment with either voriconazole or CAB and then switched to an OLAT in the event of an inadequate response, severe toxicity or intolerance. The principal data source used was the Global Comparative Aspergillosis study.RESULTS: The total cost of voriconazole when compared with CAB as initial therapy for IA was $38,319 versus $42,495 per patient, respectively, representing a 9.8% cost reduction for each patient treated with voriconazole. The higher mean cost in the CAB arm was primarily due to the high proportion of patients (73.7%) who were switched to an OLAT due to severe side effects or an inadequate response. Treating with voriconazole was a dominant strategy. The number of patients that had to be treated with voriconazole instead of CAB to save one additional life was eight.CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole as primary treatment for IA increased the chances of successful treatment, improved survival and may represent a potential cost saving strategy in Canada.


1990 ◽  
pp. 287-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dupont ◽  
◽  
I. Hilmarsdottir ◽  
A. Datry ◽  
M. Gentilini ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Góngora Rubio ◽  
Jeferson Rodrigo Zanon ◽  
Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida ◽  
Delzi Vinha Nunes de Góngora

2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Dammert ◽  
B. Bustamante ◽  
E. Ticona ◽  
A. Llanos-Cuentas ◽  
L. Huaroto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document