Measuring Perceived Level of Integration During the Process of Primary Care Behavioral Health Implementation

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin M. Staab ◽  
Mara Terras ◽  
Pooja Dave ◽  
Nancy Beckman ◽  
Sachin Shah ◽  
...  

Provider- and staff-perceived levels of integration were measured during implementation of a primary care behavioral health clinic; these data were used to tailor and evaluate quality improvement strategies. Providers and staff at an urban, academic, adult primary care clinic completed the 32-item Level of Integration Measure (LIM) at baseline and 7 months. The LIM assesses 6 domains of integrated care. Overall and domain scores were calibrated from 0 to 100, with ≥80 representing a highly integrated clinic. Response rate was 79% (N = 46/58) at baseline and 83% (N = 52/63) at follow-up. Overall, LIM score increased from 64.5 to 70.1, P = .001. The lowest scoring domains at baseline were targeted for quality improvement and increased significantly: integrated clinical practice, 60.0 versus 68.4, P < .001; systems integration, 57.0 versus 63.8, P = .001; and training, 56.7 versus 65.3, P = .001. Ongoing quality improvement, including organizational and financial strategies, is needed to achieve higher levels of integration.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S975-S976
Author(s):  
Meredith Gilliam ◽  
Sabrina Vereen

Abstract Osteoporotic fractures and their sequelae are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. In the United States, nearly 50% of white women and 20% of black women and white men will suffer a fragility fracture in his or her lifetime. Osteoporosis medications reduce the risk of major fragility fracture by 31-62%, but numerous care gaps exist, including screening rates as low as 1-47% and treatment rates as low as 16-30% even after a fracture has already occurred. From January to August 2019, we conducted a multi-faceted quality improvement project at a university hospital-based geriatric primary care clinic, with a goal of improving our rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment. We designed and tested electronic health record-based registries of eligible patients, and developed patient outreach workflows and physician “inreach” workflows. We piloted a bone health clinic. While we did not meaningfully affect the rate of osteoporosis screening, our efforts resulted in an increase in treatment of osteoporosis from 49% to 53%. Documentation of osteoporosis decision making among eligible patients improved from 66% to 80%. In our clinic, ongoing barriers to evidence-based osteoporosis management include competition for time with other medical issues, patient mistrust of medications, and the complexity of decision making around osteoporosis in older adults with polypharmacy and limited life expectancy. Future work must balance the broad application of treatment guidelines via population health tools with the need to individualize treatment decisions for each patient’s overall health and goals of care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Beehler ◽  
Kaitlin R. Lilienthal ◽  
Kyle Possemato ◽  
Emily M. Johnson ◽  
Paul R. King ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1353-S-1354
Author(s):  
Kanit Bunnag ◽  
Amarat Kongsompong ◽  
Wit Jeamwijitkul ◽  
Worayon Chuerboonchai ◽  
Chutatip Charoenthanawut ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobbie N. Ray-Sannerud ◽  
Diana C. Dolan ◽  
Chad E. Morrow ◽  
Kent A. Corso ◽  
Kathryn E. Kanzler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 233-233
Author(s):  
Sherri Rauenzahn Cervantez ◽  
Sadiyah Hotakey ◽  
Amanda Hernandez ◽  
Stephanie Warren ◽  
Jennifer Quintero ◽  
...  

233 Background: Advance directives (ADs) are legal tools that direct treatment or decision making and appoint a surrogate decision-maker (health care proxy). The presence of ADs is associated with decreased rates of hospitalization, use of life-sustaining treatment, and deaths in a hospital setting. Additionally, completed ADs lead to increased use of hospice or palliative care, more positive family outcomes, improved quality of life for patients, and reduced costs for healthcare. Despite the benefits of advance care planning, only 18-36% of adults have completed advance care plans. The aims of our pilot study were to 1) implement a synchronized system for advance care planning across the UT Health San Antonio health system and 2) improve advance care planning rates in a primary care clinic and palliative oncology clinic. Methods: During a 10-month prospective period, system processes for advance care planning were reviewed with identification of three primary drivers for advance care plan completion: a) electronic/EMR processes, b) clinical workflows and training, and c) patient resources and education. As a result of this quality improvement initiative, standardized forms, resources, and processes for obtaining advance care plans were implemented in the selected clinics. Results: At baseline, the primary care clinic had 84/644 (13%) patients and the palliative oncology clinic had 25/336(7%) with completed advance care plans. With the implementation of a standardized process, 108 patients (23% increase in rate of completion) in the primary clinic and 56 patients (71% increase in rate of completion) in the palliative oncology setting completed advance care planning (ACP). Additionally, there was a 5-fold increase in billing of ACP CPT codes within the clinics during the first 6 months compared to the prior full year. Conclusions: While this quality improvement pilot initiative was limited to two clinics, the synchronized modifications suggest that the system changes could be expanded to other clinics in our UT health system to promote ACP discussions, completion of plans, and ultimately improved patient care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Corinne Mann ◽  
John H. Golden ◽  
Nikole J. Cronk ◽  
Jamie K. Gale ◽  
Tim Hogan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document