Comparison of Postoperative Height Changes of the Second Metatarsal Among 3 Osteotomy Methods for Hallux Valgus Deformity Correction

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Young Choi ◽  
Yu Min Suh ◽  
Ji Woong Yeom ◽  
Jin Soo Suh
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Metatarsal Osteotomy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Scarf Osteotomy ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Second Metatarsal

Background: We aimed to compare the postoperative height of the second metatarsal head relative to the first metatarsal head using axial radiographs among 3 different commonly used osteotomy techniques: proximal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (PCMO), scarf osteotomy, and distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (DCMO). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs and clinical findings of the patients with painful callosities under the second metatarsal head, complicated by hallux valgus, who underwent isolated PCMO, scarf osteotomy, or DCMO from February 2005 to January 2015. Each osteotomy was performed with 20 degrees of plantar ward obliquity. Along with lateral translation and rotation of the distal fragment to correct the deformity, lowering of the first metatarsal head was made by virtue of the oblique metatarsal osteotomy. Results: Significant postoperative change in the second metatarsal height was observed on axial radiographs in all groups; this value was greatest in the PCMO group (vs scarf: P = .013; vs DCMO: P = .008) but did not significantly differ between the scarf and DCMO groups ( P = .785). The power for second metatarsal height correction was significantly greater in the PCMO group (vs scarf: P = .0005; vs DCMO: P = .0005) but did not significantly differ between the scarf and DCMO groups ( P = .832). Conclusions: Among the 3 osteotomy techniques commonly used to correct hallux valgus deformity, we observed that PCMO yielded the most effective height change of the second metatarsal head. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

scholarly journals The metatarsaus adductus effect by the syndesmosis procedure for hallux valgus correction

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-180
Author(s):  
Daniel Yiang Wu ◽  
Eddy Kwok Fai Lam
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Second Metatarsal ◽  
Metatarsus Adductus ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Clinical Records

Aims The purpose of this study is to examine the adductus impact on the second metatarsal by the nonosteotomy nonarthrodesis syndesmosis procedure for the hallux valgus deformity correction, and how it would affect the mechanical function of the forefoot in walking. For correcting the metatarsus primus varus deformity of hallux valgus feet, the syndesmosis procedure binds first metatarsal to the second metatarsal with intermetatarsal cerclage sutures. Methods We reviewed clinical records of a single surgical practice from its entire 2014 calendar year. In total, 71 patients (121 surgical feet) qualified for the study with a mean follow-up of 20.3 months (SD 6.2). We measured their metatarsus adductus angle with the Sgarlato’s method (SMAA), and the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and metatarsophalangeal angle (MPA) with Hardy’s mid axial method. We also assessed their American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) clinical scale score, and photographic and pedobarographic images for clinical function results. Results SMAA increased from preoperative 15.9° (SD 4.9°) to 17.2° (5.0°) (p < 0.001). IMA and MPA corrected from 14.6° (SD 3.3°) and 31.9° (SD 8.0°) to 7.2° (SD 2.2°) and 18.8° (SD 6.4°) (p < 0.001), respectively. AOFAS score improved from 66.8 (SD 12.0) to 96.1 (SD 8.0) points (p < 0.001). Overall, 98% (119/121) of feet with preoperative plantar calluses had them disappeared or noticeably subsided, and 93% (113/121) of feet demonstrated pedobarographic medialization of forefoot force in walking. We reported all complications. Conclusion This study, for the first time, reported the previously unknown metatarsus adductus side-effect of the syndesmosis procedure. However, it did not compromise function restoration of the forefoot by evidence of our patients' plantar callus and pedobarographic findings. Level of Clinical Evidence: III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):174–180.

scholarly journals Shortened First Metatarsal Bone and Newly Developed Second Metatarsalgia after Parallel-shaped Modified Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Deformity

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Wan Suh ◽  
Ho-Seong Jang ◽  
Hyun-Woo Park ◽  
Sung Bae Park
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Metatarsal Bone ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Scarf Osteotomy ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Second Metatarsal ◽  
The Mean

Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: The scarf osteotomy has gained in popularity for the treatment of a symptomatic hallux valgus deformity due to its inherent stability, versatility of correction and early mobilization. We have reported parallel-shaped modified scarf osteotomy(PSMSO) with good functional outcomes and no complication as stress fracture or troughing. However, we encountered second transfer metatarsalgia after the osteotomy. The scarf osteotomy can be shortened, but there was no specific amount of shortening that will produce transfer metatarsalgia in limitation of our literature review. In this study, we measured the shortening of first metatarsal length and investigated the relation of first metatarsal length and second transfer metatarsalgia after PSMSO for hallux valgus deformity. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 168 consecutive PSMSOs performed in 124 patients with hallux valgus deformity between March 2009 and August 2015. Concomitant other pathologies of foot or previous second metatarsalgia were excluded. After excluding 45 cases, 123 cases in 88 patients were included. For clinical assessment, VAS, the AOFAS Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal (AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP) Scale were obtained. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), the first metatarsal length measured by a modified Davies and Saxby’s method and the protrusion of second metatarsal relative to first metatarsal using the Maestro’s method were assessed on standard weight bearing radiographs of the foot. For evaluation of the development of second transfer metatarsalgia, callosity or tenderness beneath the second metatarsal head was investigated. After identifying the lesion, we divided two groups with and without second transfer metatarsalgia and compared the variables after propensity score matching. Results: Mean follow-up period was 20.6±7.8 (12-66) months. The mean VAS and AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP score improved significantly (p<0.001). Significant corrections in the HVA, IMA and DMAA were obtained and the mean shortening of the first metatarsal length and the mean relative lengthening of second metatarsal protrusion were -3.1±2.5 mm and +2.5±2.8 mm at last follow-up (p<0.001, p<0.001). Eleven (8.9%, 11/123) cases developed second transfer metatarsalgia after PSMSO. After propensity score matching considered baseline characteristics, 9 cases with second transfer metatarsalgia were compared to 31 cases without it. The group with transfer metatarsalgia showed significant shortening in first metatarsal length and lengthening of second metatarsal protrusion relative to first metatarsal compared to those without the transfer lesion (-4.8±3.8 vs -2.0±2.1, p=0.013, +4.2±1.6 vs +1.9±2.1, p=0.005). Conclusion: Transfer metatarsalgia is one of numerous possible complications after scarf osteotomy. To avoid complications, we suggest that shortening of first metatarsal bone length should be minimized within -2 mm and second metatarsal protrusion relative to first metatarsal kept within +1.9 mm with considering the metatarsal parabola. If the shortening of first metatarsal was done over -4.8 mm, the additional procedure for second metatarsal may be considered.

First Metatarsal Rotation in Hallux Valgus Deformity

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-522
Author(s):  
Jesse Steadman ◽  
Alexej Barg ◽  
Charles L. Saltzman
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Advanced Imaging ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Biplanar Radiographs

Rotation of the first metatarsal (M1) as a potential etiological factor of hallux valgus (HV) deformity was described relatively early in the description of HV pathoanatomy. However, because biplanar radiographs have been the standard method for imaging HV, clinicians primarily developed measurement methods and corrective operations confined to 2 dimensions, medial-lateral and inferior-superior. Recently, as our understanding of HV pathoanatomy has further developed, aided in part by advanced imaging technology, M1 rotation about its axis (“axial rotation”) and its implications for HV deformity and treatment has reemerged. The goal of this review is to summarize M1 rotation in HV from a historical perspective, to present the current understanding of its potential role in the etiology/pathogenesis of HV, and to summarize relevant imaging and operative considerations with respect to M1 rotation. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

Correlation of Different Methods of Measuring Pronation of the First Metatarsal on Weightbearing CT Scans

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110030
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Conti ◽  
Tamanna J. Patel ◽  
Kristin C. Caolo ◽  
Joseph M. Amadio ◽  
Mark C. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
3D Cad ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Second Metatarsal ◽  
Α Angle

Background: There is no consensus in the foot and ankle literature regarding how to measure pronation of the first metatarsal in patients with hallux valgus. The primary purpose of this study was to compare 2 previously published methods for measuring pronation of the first metatarsal and a novel 3-dimensional measurement of pronation to determine if different measurements of pronation are associated with each other. Methods: Thirty patients who underwent a modified Lapidus procedure for their hallux valgus deformity were included in this study. Pronation of the first metatarsal was measured on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans using the α angle with reference to the floor, a 3-dimensional computer-aided design (3D CAD) calculation with reference to the second metatarsal, and a novel method, called the triplanar angle of pronation (TAP), that included references to both the floor (floor TAP) and base of the second metatarsal (second TAP). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to determine if the 3 calculated angles of pronation correlated to each other. Results: Preoperative and postoperative α angle and 3D CAD had no correlation with each other ( r = 0.094, P = .626 and r = 0.076, P = .694, respectively). Preoperative and postoperative second TAP and 3D CAD also had no correlation ( r = 0.095, P = .624 and r = 0.320, P = .09, respectively). However, preoperative and postoperative floor TAP and α angle were found to have moderate correlations ( r = 0.595, P = .001 and r = 0.501, P = .005, respectively). Conclusion: The calculation of first metatarsal pronation is affected by the reference and technique used, and further work is needed to establish a consistent measurement for the foot and ankle community. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Proximal Rotational Metatarsal Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus (PROMO)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301141879007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Wagner ◽  
Emilio Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Metatarsal Osteotomy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Intermetatarsal Angle ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Prospective Case Series

Background: Hallux valgus deformity consists of a lateral deviation of the great toe, metatarsus varus, and pronation of the first metatarsal. Most osteotomies only correct varus, but not the pronation of the metatarsal. Persistent postoperative pronation has been shown to increase deformity recurrence and have worse functional outcomes. The proximal rotational metatarsal osteotomy (PROMO) technique reliably corrects pronation and varus through a stable osteotomy, avoiding fusing any healthy joints. The objective of this research is to show a prospective series of the PROMO technique. Methods: Twenty-five patients (30 feet) were operated with the PROMO technique. The sample included 22 women and 3 men, average age 46 years (range 22-59), for a mean prospective follow-up of 1 year (range 9-14 months). Inclusion criteria included symptomatic hallux valgus deformities, absence of severe joint arthritis, or inflammatory arthropathies, with a metatarsal malrotation of 10 degrees or more, with no tarsometatarsal subluxation or arthritis on the anteroposterior or lateral foot radiograph views. The mean preoperative and postoperative Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score, metatarsophalangeal angle, intermetatarsal angle, metatarsal malrotation, complications, satisfaction, and recurrence were recorded. Results: The mean preoperative and postoperative LEFS scores were 56 and 73. The median pre-/postoperative metatarsophalangeal angle was 32.5/4 degrees and the intermetatarsal angle 15.5/5 degrees. The metatarsal rotation was satisfactorily corrected in 24 of 25 patients. An Akin osteotomy was needed in 27 of 30 feet. All patients were satisfied with the surgery, and no recurrence or complications were found. Conclusions: PROMO is a reliable technique, with good short-term results in terms of angular correction, satisfaction, and recurrence. Long-term studies are needed to determine if a lower hallux recurrence rate occurs with the correction of metatarsal rotation in comparison with conventional osteotomies. Level of evidence: IV, prospective case series.

Clinical, Quantitative Assessment of First Tarsometatarsal Mobility in the Sagittal Plane and Its Relation to Hallux Valgus Deformity

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaj Klaue ◽  
Sigvard T. Hansen ◽  
Alain C. Masquelet
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
First Ray

Today, bunion surgery is still controversial. Considering that a bunion deformity in fact may be a result of multiple causes, the rationale of the currently applied techniques of surgical treatment has not been conclusively demonstrated. In view of the known hypermobility syndrome of the first ray that results in insufficient weightbearing beneath the first metatarsal head, the relationship between this syndrome and hallux valgus deformity has been investigated. The results suggest a direct relationship between painful hallux valgus deformity and hypermobility in extension of the first tarsometatarsal joint. A pathological mechanism of symptomatic hallux valgus is proposed that relates this pathology with primary weightbearing disturbances in the forefoot where angulation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is one of the consequences. The alignment of the metatarsal heads within the sagittal plane seems to be a main concern in many hallux valgus deformities. As a consequence, treatment includes reestablishing stable sagittal alignment in addition to the horizontal reposition of the metatarsal over the sesamoid complex. As an example, first tarsometatarsal reorientation arthrodesis regulates the elasticity of the multiarticular first ray within the sagittal plane and may be the treatment of choice in many hallux valgus deformities.

A Review of Surgical Procedures for Hallux Valgus

Foot & Ankle ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Bargman ◽  
John Corless ◽  
Allan E. Gross ◽  
Fred Langer
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patient ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Satisfactory Result ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Metatarsal Osteotomy ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity

One hundred seventy-two patients who underwent surgical correction of hallux valgus deformity were evaluated. The procedures chosen were: first metatarsal osteotomy in 96, Keller procedure in 42, metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in 25, and simple bunionectomy in 9. This study allowed the establishment of the following guidelines for surgery. 1) Osteotomy alone yields a satisfactory result in patients under the age of 50 years who have minimal osteoarthritis of the metatarsophalangeal joint. 2) The Keller procedure is suggested in patients over the age of 50 who have significant osteoarthritis. 3) Metatarsophalangeal fusion is suggested in patients under the age of 50 with significant osteoarthritis. 4) Simple bunionectomy revealed poor results in the majority of patients. It should be reserved for the elderly patient with an infected bunion.

Stress Fractures of the Lesser Metatarsals After a Wilson Osteotomy for Correction of Hallux Valgus Deformity

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Kirkos ◽  
Margaritis J. Kyrkos ◽  
George A. Kapetanos
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Stress Fracture ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Stress Fractures ◽  
Metatarsal Osteotomy ◽  
Compression Stress ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
First Ray

This article describes a patient with lesser-metatarsal stress fractures resulting from an oblique Wilson displacement first metatarsal osteotomy. The shortening of the first metatarsal forces the lesser metatarsals to bear the weight previously borne by the first ray and increases the compression stress on the adjacent metatarsal heads. The proximal displacement of the osteotomy must be minimized in order to limit the risk of stress fracture of the lesser metatarsals. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96(1): 63–66, 2006)

Modified Lapidus Versus Scarf Osteotomy Outcomes for Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110137
Author(s):  
Megan E. Reilly ◽  
Matthew S. Conti ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Aoife MacMahon ◽  
Bopha Chrea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scarf Osteotomy ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: The Lapidus procedure and scarf osteotomy are indicated for the operative treatment of hallux valgus; however, no prior studies have compared outcomes between the procedures. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with symptomatic hallux valgus treated with the modified Lapidus procedure versus scarf osteotomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated by 1 of 7 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons. Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, primary modified Lapidus procedure or scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus, minimum 1-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, and minimum 3-month postoperative radiographs. Revision cases were excluded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using 6 PROMIS domains. Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral weightbearing radiographs. Statistical analysis utilized targeted minimum-loss estimation (TMLE) to control for confounders. Results: A total of 136 patients (73 Lapidus, 63 scarf) with an average of 17.8 months of follow-up were included in this study. There was significant improvement in PROMIS physical function scores in the modified Lapidus (mean change, 5.25; P < .01) and scarf osteotomy (mean change, 5.50; P < .01) cohorts, with no significant differences between the 2 groups ( P = .85). After controlling for bunion severity, the probability of having a normal postoperative intermetatarsal angle (IMA; <9 degrees) was 25% lower ( P = .04) with the scarf osteotomy compared with the Lapidus procedure. Conclusion: Although the modified Lapidus procedure led to a higher probability of achieving a normal IMA, both procedures yielded similar improvements in 1-year patient-reported outcome measures. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document