Seminar in Public Health Law and Policy in an Interprofessional Setting: Preparing Practitioners for Collaborative Practice at the Macro Level

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (S1) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. McCabe

The author created a new course, called “Seminar in Public Health Law and Policy in an Interprofessional Setting” to address the need for interprofessional education (IPE) to equip graduate and professional students for collaborative practice at the systemic and policy (i.e., macro”) levels in the health care and public health fields. Despite important work being done at the clinical practice level, limited existing IPE models examine larger systemic issues. The course is designed specifically to enable students in social work, law, and public health to recognize the reciprocal relationships between policy and interprofessional collaborative practice, including the need for understanding of the impact of team-practice work at the system and policy levels.

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (S1) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Tobin Tyler

This interdisciplinary course, which included students from medicine, public health, law, and public policy, explored the concept of “prevention” and the role of law and public policy preventing disease and injury and improving population health. In addition to interdisciplinary course content, students worked in interdisciplinary teams on public health law and policy projects at community organizations and agencies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (S2) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
James G. Hodge ◽  
Wendy E. Parmet ◽  
Georges Benjamin ◽  
Sarah Somers ◽  
Chelsea Gulinson

Following the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in one of the most sensational jurisprudence events of the modern era, we examine potential repercussions across multiple themes in public health, law, and policy stemming from his ideology and the confirmation process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. McCabe ◽  
Marea K. Kinney ◽  
Stephanie Q. Quiring ◽  
Doug Jerolimov

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Faunce

This article explores a unique opportunity for shaping public health law and policy to reflect a greater balance between public and private goods in two areas of primary concern to human well-being: medicine and human biosecurity. This opportunity is presented both by the rapid changes likely to occur in these areas as a result of nanotechnology and the fact that multinational corporate actors have not yet had the opportunity to use their well-honed techniques of governance influence to modify public health policy and law in this area to their own narrowly focused advantage. Such a rare opportunity to rethink some fundamental assumptions about a regulatory framework for globally important health issues in advance is one reason why issues concerning nanotechnology regulation in medicine and human biosecurity should have considerable interest to health law and policy scholars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document