Association Between Continuous Performance and Response Inhibition Tests in Adults With ADHD

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagai Maoz ◽  
Shai Aviram ◽  
Uri Nitzan ◽  
Aviv Segev ◽  
Yuval Bloch

Objective: The study of ADHD uses various computerized tests to assess cognitive functions. Uncertainty exists regarding the association between deficits found by different tools testing similar or different cognitive functions (e.g., continuous performance tests [CPT] and response inhibition [RI] tests).We hypothesized that different tools that measure continuous performance will be better correlated between themselves than with a tool that examines RI. Method: Thirty-six adults with ADHD performed two different CPTs and a RI task. We analyzed correlations between different measures examined by the tasks. Results: There were strong correlations between corresponding measures in the CPTs. Correlations between the results in CPT and the RI task were only minimal. Conclusion: These findings support the specificity of impairments in different cognitive domains (continuous attention vs. RI) beyond the specific test used in the study of ADHD. Also, these findings strengthen the importance of specific discriminative cognitive domains in ADHD.

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Luís Schmidt ◽  
Eunice do Nascimento Simões ◽  
Ana Lúcia Novais Carvalho

Objective: Continuous Performance Tests (CPTs) are known to measure inattention and impulsivity in students with ADHD. Many CPTs utilize a visual format. It is accepted that auditory tasks reflect attentional demand more closely in the classroom. Thus, the association between deficits found by auditory and visual CPTs needs to be studied. We hypothesized that impulsivity would be dependent on sensory modality and inattention would be a unitary cross-modal construct. Method: Forty-four students with ADHD performed two CPTs (visual and auditory). We analyzed correlations between the variables examined by the two tasks. Results: There were strong correlations between variables measuring inattention. Correlations between auditory and visual measures of impulsivity were weak. Conclusion: Inattention is partially independent of modality. In contrast, response inhibition is modality-specific. Although ADHD is defined regardless of modality, hyperactive students may exhibit deficits in the auditory modality but not in the visual modality or vice versa.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 40-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darcey M. Allan ◽  
Nicholas P. Allan ◽  
Matthew D. Lerner ◽  
Amber L. Farrington ◽  
Christopher J. Lonigan

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Bismark ◽  
Michael L. Thomas ◽  
Melissa Tarasenko ◽  
Alexandra L. Shiluk ◽  
Sonia Y. Rackelmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document