Medical and Infectious Waste Management

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ira F. Salkin ◽  
Edward Krisiunas ◽  
Wayne L. Turnberg
1969 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Bushra Iftikhar ◽  
Muhammad Jan ◽  
Khurshid Ahmad ◽  
Satea Arif

Objectives: The study was designed to find out the type and quantity of different type of wastes generated inthe two wings of Saidu Group of teaching Hospitals. The study also aimed at finding that whether facilitiesare available in different units for the segregation, storage, disinfection of infectious waste at the onset andmethods of disposal of waste within and outside the hospital. Also, types of items reused and their methodsof sterilization and the fate of used syringes was found out.Study Design: ObservationalMethodology: The study focus was Saidu Teaching Hospital (STH), a tertiary care hospital providingservices to the people of Swat, Malakand, Dir, Kohistan and areas far up to Chitral. Situated 1.5 Km apartSTH consists of two administrative units,Saidu Wing and Central Wing.A qualitative analysis of various aspects of waste management was done by reviewing the availableauthentic record and discussion with the sanitary and administrative staff of the hospital. All the data wascollected according to, and filled in a pre-designed questionnaire.Results: It was found that Saidu Teaching Hospital generates more than 550 Kg of solid waste and 1295liters of liquid waste per day, which makes 1.2 Kg/bed/day. As a whole 80% of the waste generated wasordinary garbage, 12% was infectious, 4% was Pharmacological, 3% pathological and 0.8% consisted ofsharps.The provision of facilities for the segregation of waste at outpatient departments, Wards, Operation theatreand Laboratories/Blood Banks were 7.5%, 7%, 20% and 28.5% respectively and for storage of waste beforedisposal at outpatient departments, Wards, Operation theatre and Laboratories / Blood Banks were 22%,8%, 0% and 28.5% respectively.Disinfection of infectious waste at outpatient departments, wards, operation theatre and laboratories / bloodbanks was 10%, 12%, 0% and 17% respectively. Methods used were treatment with phenyl and burning inopen air.About the removal of waste from hospital premises, 78% mentioned sweepers, 17% said rig pickers while5% said that there is no one to take away the waste.54% admitted that they threw the syringes as such in thebins.The study found that 80% of the waste went to the municipal corporation land fills, the rest was either burntor thrown as such into the water channel passing through the hospital (12% & 8% respectively). 67% blamedthe administration, 25 % held the doctors responsible, 37% charged the nursing staff and 67% blamed thesweepers for the faulty management of hospital waste.Conclusion: It is thus concluded that Saidu Teaching Hospital generates huge amount of solid and liquidwaste, which is not properly disposed off currently, therefore it needs modern and scientific waste disposalsystems.Keywords: Waste Management, hospital waste management, waste disposal


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Bala ◽  
A Narwal

ABSTRACT The Bio-medical waste (Management and handling) Rules 1988 lay down clear methods for disposal of bio-medical waste, defined as “any waste generated during the diagnosis, treatment or immunization of human beings or animals or in research activities used in the production or testing of biologicals.” The current scenario in the country reveals partial or no segregation at the time of generation, which at times is done by the contractors, or the rag pickers. However, the improper practice of segregation at the site of origin has been observed which causes mixing of infectious and non-infectious waste. A study was therefore, conducted to understand the awareness amongst the employees as regards to Bio-Medical Waste (BMW) Management practices, policies and to assess their attitude towards it, in a premier tertiary level research and referral Institute in Haryana (India).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document