Pressure Control in Glaucoma Patients after Cataract Surgery with Intraocular Lens

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Calissendorff ◽  
H. Hamberg-Nyström

In a retrospective study 97 patients with glaucoma and 16 with ocular hypertension were examined with regard to intraocular pressure (IOP) after extracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of a posterior chamber lens. During the follow-up 39 cases dropped out but 63 glaucoma patients and 11 patients with ocular hypertension were followed for three years. Compared to preoperative IOP 59% of the patients treated previously with Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) had an IOP rise of > 10 mm Hg the day after surgery. The corresponding proportion among medically treated patients was 34% (P=0.01). A pressure rise of > 10 mm Hg was less frequent among patients treated with one drug than among those treated with two or three (P=0.05). During follow-up eight patients had a pressure rise which could not be controlled medically and they had to undergo additional ALT or surgery. All eight had been treated with ALT or with glaucoma filtering surgery prior to the cataract operation. After three years observation of 63 of the glaucoma patients, 63% were having less medical therapy than preoperatively, 30% an equal amount and 7% more; 49% (31 of 63) were still without any therapy. In the group of patients who preoperatively were only treated medically, no definite increase in therapy was needed in the long term.

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mumtaz Hussain ◽  
Muhammad Moin ◽  
Nazir Ahmad Aasi ◽  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Jawaid Mughal

The study of 30 patients was performed at Lahore General Hospital, and Institute Of Ophthalmology Mayo Hospital, Lahore from June 1989 to June 2003 for 14 years. Total number of eyes were 34 where 2 patients had both eyes. Age ranged from 12-65 years. Males were 11 and females were 19. all the patients had planned extracapsular cataract extraction with IOL implantation. Total follow up period ranged from 1-5 years and best corrected visual acuity in these patients after surgery was 6/12 to 6/6. Post operatively, eyes had vitreous membranes and glaucomatous reaction.


1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Gurung ◽  
DB Karki ◽  
S Shrestha ◽  
AP Rijal

Background: An effective method for cataract surgery should be identified to combat cataract blindness. Aim: To study the surgical outcome of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual small-incision cataract surgery. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out including one hundred eyes (88 patients) which were divided into two groups using systematic randomization: groups of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (ECCE with PCIOL) implantation and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). The postoperative parameters/variables studied were the unaided and best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism. Statistics: Epi info 2000 version statistical software was used for data analysis and calculation of relative risk, 95% CI and p value. The p value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: In the immediate postoperative period, unaided visual acuity of =/> 6/18 was achieved in 24 subjects in MSICS group versus 7 in ECCE with PCIOL group (RR=2.05, 95% CI=1.44 - 2.94, p = 0.0002), whereas the same at 6 - 8 weeks postoperatively was found in 28 and 22 subjects in those groups respectively (RR=1.27, 95% CI=0.86-1.89, p=0.23). The astigmatism of =/> 2 at 6 - 8 weeks was found in 35 and 17 subjects from the conventional and MSICS groups respectively ( R=2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.73, p=0.0002). Conclusion: Both MSICS and conventional ECCE with PCIOL are safe and effective techniques for treatment of cataract patients. A more rapid recovery of good vision can be achieved with MSICS than with conventional ECCE with PCIOL in the immediate postoperative period. Key words: ECCE; MSICS; visual acuity; astigmatism DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i1.3668 Nep J Oph 2009;1(1):13-19


2000 ◽  
Vol 214 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Kemal Arici ◽  
Ayşen Topalkara ◽  
Süleyman Demırcan ◽  
Haydar Erdoğan ◽  
Cenap Güler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document