scholarly journals Our Peers—Empowerment and Navigational Support (OP-ENS): Development of a Peer Health Navigator Intervention to Support Medicaid Beneficiaries With Physical Disabilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 117957271984475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Magasi ◽  
Christina Papadimitriou ◽  
Judy Panko Reis ◽  
Kimberly The ◽  
Jennifer Thomas ◽  
...  

People with disabilities (PWD) are a health disparities population who experience well-documented physical, structural, attitudinal, and financial barriers to health care. The disability rights community is deeply engaged in advocacy to promote health care justice for all PWD. As the community continues to work toward systems change, there is a critical need for community-directed interventions that ensure individuals with disabilities are able to access the health care services they need and are entitled to. Peer health navigator (PHN) programs have been shown to help people from diverse underserved communities break down barriers to health care. The PHN model has not been systematically adapted to meet the needs of PWD. In this article, we describe the collaborative process of developing Our Peers—Empowerment and Navigational Supports (OP-ENS), an evidence-informed PHN intervention for Medicaid beneficiaries with physical disabilities in Chicago, IL, USA. Our Peers—Empowerment and Navigational Supports is a 12-month community-based PHN intervention that pairs Medicaid beneficiaries with physical disabilities (peers) with disability PHNs who use a structured recursive process of barrier identification and asset mapping, goal setting, and action planning to help peers meet their health care needs. Our Peers—Empowerment and Navigational Supports was developed by a collaborative team that included disability rights leaders, representatives from a Medicaid managed care organization, and academic disability health care justice researchers. We highlight both the conceptual and empirical evidence that informed OP-ENS as well as the lessons learned that can assist future developers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2123-2132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Osborn ◽  
Michelle M. Doty ◽  
Donald Moulds ◽  
Dana O. Sarnak ◽  
Arnav Shah

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry A. Glied ◽  
Sara R. Collins ◽  
Saunders Lin

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Salinas ◽  
Josiah M. Heyman ◽  
Louis D. Brown

Purpose: To determine the barriers to health care access by chronic disease and depression/anxiety diagnosis in Mexican Americans living in El Paso, TX. Design: A secondary analysis was conducted using data for 1,002 Hispanics from El Paso, TX (2009-2010). Logistic regression was conducted for financial barriers by number of chronic conditions and depression/anxiety diagnosis. Interaction models were conducted between number of chronic conditions and depression or anxiety. Results: Depressed/anxious individuals reported more financial barriers than those with chronic conditions alone. There were significant interactions between number of chronic conditions and depression/anxiety for cost, denied treatment because of an inability to pay, and an inability to pay $25 for health care. Conclusion: Financial barriers should be considered to maintain optimal care for both mental and physical health in this population. Implications for Practice: There should be more focus on the impact of depression or anxiety as financial barriers to compliance.


JAMA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 297 (10) ◽  
pp. 1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali R. Rahimi ◽  
John A. Spertus ◽  
Kimberly J. Reid ◽  
Susannah M. Bernheim ◽  
Harlan M. Krumholz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document