scholarly journals A pulmonary embolism response team’s initial 20 month experience treating 87 patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhilesh K Sista ◽  
Oren A Friedman ◽  
Eda Dou ◽  
Brendan Denvir ◽  
Gulce Askin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Brain Cancer ◽  
Massive Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Multidisciplinary Assessment ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Hospital Deaths

Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) have emerged to provide rapid multidisciplinary assessment and treatment of PE patients. However, descriptive institutional experience and preliminary outcomes data from such teams are sparse. PERT activations were identified through a retrospective review. Only confirmed submassive or massive PEs were included in the data analysis. In addition to baseline variables, the therapeutic intervention, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and bleeding rate/severity were recorded. A total of 124 PERT activations occurred over 20 months: 43 in the first 10 months and 81 in the next 10. A total of 87 submassive (90.8%) and massive (9.2%) PE patients were included. The median age was 65 (51–75 IQR) years. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) was administered to 25 patients, systemic thrombolysis (ST) to six, and anticoagulation alone (AC) to 54. The median ICU stay and overall LOS were 6 (3–10 IQR) and 7 (4–14 IQR) days, respectively, with no association with any variables except a brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) >100 pg/mL ( p=0.008 ICU LOS; p=0.047 overall LOS). Twelve patients (13.7%) died in the hospital, nine of whom had metastatic or brain cancer, with a median overall LOS of 13 (11–17 IQR) days. There were five major bleeds: one in the CDT group, one in the ST group, and three in the AC group. Overall, (1) PERT activations increased after the first 10 months; (2) BNP >100 pg/mL was associated with a longer LOS; (3) rates of mortality and bleeding did not correlate with treatment; and (4) the majority of in-hospital deaths occurred in patients with advanced cancer.

scholarly journals Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Treated with VA-ECLS and Catheter tPA

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117954842095745
Author(s):  
Arda Akoluk ◽  
Usman Mazahir ◽  
Steven Douedi ◽  
Adel Aziz ◽  
Aref Obagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Massive Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Response Monitoring ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
First Case ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Bail Out

Background: Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been the focus of the medical world since being declared a pandemic in March 2020. While the pathogenesis and heterogeneity of COVID-19 manifestations is still not fully understood, viral evasion of cellular immune responses and inflammatory dysregulation are believed to play essential roles in disease progression and severity. Case Presentation: We present the first case of a patient with COVID-19 with massive pulmonary embolism treated successfully with systemic thrombolysis, VA-ECLS, and bail out catheter directed thrombolysis. He was discharged from the hospital after an eventful hospital course on therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin. Conclusions: We present the first case of a patient with COVID-19 with massive pulmonary embolism (PE) treated successfully with systemic thrombolysis, VA-ECLS and bail out catheter directed thrombolysis. In our experience catheter directed thrombolysis comes with an acceptable bleeding risk despite use of mechanical circulatory support, particularly with meticulous attention to vascular access and dose response monitoring.

COVID-19 complicated by pulmonary embolism treated with catheter directed thrombectomy

VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Leonardo Galastri ◽  
Leonardo Guedes Moreira Valle ◽  
Breno Boueri Affonso ◽  
Marcela Juliano Silva ◽  
Rodrigo Gobbo Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Dynamic Process ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Massive Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Percutaneous Intervention ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Emergency Center ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Summary: COVID-19 is a recently identified illness that is associated with thromboembolic events. We report a case of pulmonary embolism in a patient with COVID-19, treated by catheter directed thrombectomy. A 57 year old patient presented to the emergency center with severe COVID-19 symptoms and developed massive pulmonary embolism. The patient was treated with catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and recovered completely. Coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 is present in all severe cases and is a dynamic process. We describe a case of massive/high risk pulmonary embolism, in a patient with COVID-19 receiving full anticoagulation, who was treated by percutaneous intervention. CDT can be an additional therapeutic option in patients with COVID-19 and pulmonary embolism that present with rapid clinical collapse.

Systemic thrombolysis for acute massive pulmonary embolism in the immediate postoperative period after bariatric surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf A. Weiner ◽  
Markos Daskalakis ◽  
Sophia Theodoridou ◽  
Sven Fassbender ◽  
Karin Parutsch
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Massive Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis

scholarly journals TRENDS IN CATHETER DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS AND SYSTEMIC THROMBOLYSIS FOR PULMONARY EMBOLISM TREATMENT: 2004-2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 1879
Author(s):  
Srinath Adusumalli ◽  
Bram Geller ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Jay Giri ◽  
Peter Groeneveld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasoon P. Mohan ◽  
John J. Manov ◽  
Francisco Contreras ◽  
Michael E. Langston ◽  
Mehul H. Doshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Ultrasound Assisted ◽  
Vascular Obstruction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction

Purpose: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is a relatively new therapy for pulmonary embolism that achieves the superior clot resolution compared to systemic thrombolysis while avoiding the high bleeding risk intrinsically associated with that therapy. In order to examine the efficacy and safety of CDT, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ultrasound-assisted CDT at our institution. Methods: The charts of 30 consecutive patients who underwent CDT as a treatment of pulmonary embolism at our institution were reviewed. Risk factors for bleeding during thrombolysis were noted. Indicators of the right heart strain on computed tomography and echocardiogram, as well as the degree of pulmonary vascular obstruction, were recorded before and after CDT. Thirty-day mortality and occurrence of bleeding events were recorded. Results: Nine (30%) patients had 3 or more minor contraindications to thrombolysis and 14 (47%) had major surgery in the month prior to CDT. Right ventricular systolic pressure and vascular obstruction decreased significantly after CDT. There was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with right ventricular dilation or hypokinesis. Decrease in pulmonary vascular obstruction was associated with nadir of fibrinogen level. No patients experienced major or moderate bleeding attributed to CDT. Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is an effective therapy in rapidly alleviating the right heart strain that is associated with increased mortality and long-term morbidity in patients with pulmonary embolism with minimal bleeding risk. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe alternative to systemic thrombolysis in patients with risk factors for bleeding such as prior surgery. Future studies should examine the safety of CDT in patients with contraindications to systemic thrombolysis.

Bleeding, death, and costs of care during hospitalization for acute pulmonary embolism: Insights from the Saint Luke’s Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (SLOPE) study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1358863X2096741
Author(s):  
Matthew C Bunte ◽  
Kensey Gosch ◽  
Ahmed Elkaryoni ◽  
Anas Noman ◽  
Erin Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Acute Pe

Limited data exist that comprehensively describe the practical management, in-hospital outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and rates of post-hospital readmission among patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE). Consecutive discharges for acute PE were identified from a single health system over 3 years. Records were audited to confirm presence of acute PE, patient characteristics, disease severity, medical treatment, and PE-related invasive therapies. Rates of in-hospital major bleeding and death, hospital length of stay (LOS), direct costs, and hospital readmission are reported. From January 2016 to December 2018, 371 patients were hospitalized for acute massive or submassive PE. In-hospital major bleeding (12.1%) was common, despite low utilization of systemic thrombolysis (1.8%) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (3.0%). In-hospital death was 10-fold higher among massive PE compared to submassive PE (36.6% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001). Massive PE was more common during hospitalizations not primarily related to venous thromboembolism, including hospitalizations primarily for sepsis or infection (26.8% vs 8.2%, p = 0.001). Overall, the median LOS was 6.0 days (IQR, 3.0–11.0) and the median standardized direct cost of admissions was $10,032 (IQR, $4467–$20,330). Rates of all-cause readmission were relatively high throughout late follow-up but did not differ between PE subgroups. Despite low utilization of thrombolysis, in-hospital bleeding remains a common adverse event during hospitalizations for acute PE. Although massive PE is associated with high risk for in-hospital bleeding and death, those successfully discharged after a massive PE demonstrate similar rates of readmission compared to submassive PE into late follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document