Is health-related quality of life a suitable outcome measure for evaluating health promotion programmes?

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 671-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Ashley ◽  
Andrew Lloyd ◽  
Sarah Lamb ◽  
Helen Bartlett
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1169-1181
Author(s):  
Roxanne M. Parslow ◽  
Nina Anderson ◽  
Danielle Byrne ◽  
Kirstie L. Haywood ◽  
Alison Shaw ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalopathy (ME) is relatively common in children and is disabling at an important time in their development. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework of paediatric CFS/ME using the patient-perspective to ensure that the content of a new outcome measure includes the outcomes most important to young people. Methods We developed a child-centred interactive card ranking exercise that included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes identified from a previous review of the literature as well as qualitative work. Adolescents and their parents selected and ranked the outcomes most important to them and discussed each outcome in further detail. Adolescents were purposively sampled from a single specialist paediatric CFS/ME service in England. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic framework analysis was used to develop the final conceptual framework. Results We interviewed 43 participants in which there are 21 adolescents, 12–17 years of age with mild–moderate CFS/ME and their parents (20 mothers and 2 fathers). ‘Symptoms’, ‘tiredness’, ‘payback and crashing’ and ‘activities and hobbies’ were ranked most important to improve by both children and parents. Children ranked ‘school’ higher than parents and parents ranked ‘mood’ higher than children. A youth- specific CFS/ME conceptual framework of HRQoL was produced that included 4 outcome domains and 11 subdomains: sleep, tiredness, problems concentrating, individual symptoms, fluctuation and payback, daily and general activities, participation in school, leisure and social life, mood, anxiety and self-esteem. Conclusions An interactive card ranking exercise worked well for adolescents aged 12–17 to elicit the most important outcomes to them and explore each domain in further detail. We developed a final conceptual framework of HRQoL that forms the basis of a new paediatric patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in CFS/ME.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aretuza Pires dos Santos Lattanzi ◽  
Flávia Maia Silveira ◽  
Ludmila Guimarães ◽  
Lívia Azeredo Alves Antunes ◽  
Leonardos Santos Antunes ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 456-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn P. Altizer ◽  
Ha T. Nguyen ◽  
Rebecca H. Neiberg ◽  
Sara A. Quandt ◽  
Joseph G. Grzywacz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire E. E. de Vries ◽  
Dennis J. S. Makarawung ◽  
Valerie M. Monpellier ◽  
Ignace M. C. Janssen ◽  
Steve M. M. de Castro ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The RAND-36 is the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in bariatric surgery. However, the RAND-36 has never been adequately validated in bariatric surgery. The purpose of this study was to validate the RAND-36 in Dutch patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Material and Methods To validate the RAND-36, the following measurement properties were assessed in bariatric surgery patients: validity (the degree to which the RAND-36 measures what it purports to measure (HRQoL)), reliability (the extent to which the scores of the RAND-36 are the same for repeated measurement for patients who have not changed in HRQoL), responsiveness (the ability of the RAND-36 to detect changes in HRQoL over time). Results Two thousand one hundred thirty-seven patients were included. Validity was not adequate due to the irrelevance of some items and response options, the lack of items relevant to patients undergoing bariatric surgery, and the RAND-36 did not actually measure what it was intended to measure in this study (HRQoL in bariatric surgery patients). Reliability was insufficient for the majority of the scales (the scores of patients who had not changed in HRQoL were different when the RAND was completed a second time (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values 0.10–0.69)). Responsiveness was insufficient. Conclusion The RAND-36 was not supported by sufficient validation evidence in patients undergoing bariatric surgery, which means that the RAND-36 does not adequately measure HRQoL in this patient population. Future research studies should use PROMs that are specifically designed for assessing HRQoL in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Graphical abstract


Author(s):  
Melissa M. Hudson ◽  
Vida L. Tyc ◽  
Deepthi A. Jayawardene ◽  
Jami Gattuso ◽  
A. Quargnenti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document