Failure of wall–slab joint in unreinforced masonry building

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Lin ◽  
Xiuming Yang ◽  
Keyu Li ◽  
Xianglin Gu ◽  
Xiang Li

Investigations on buildings severely damaged due to earthquakes or explosions have indicated that unreinforced masonry buildings with simply supported precast concrete floor slabs exhibit deficiencies in resistance to progressive collapse, compared to unreinforced masonry buildings with continuous cast in situ concrete floor slabs. The collapse mechanisms observed in the two types of unreinforced masonry buildings are closely related to wall–slab joint failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the failure behavior of wall–slab joints and the effect on the collapse of the two types of unreinforced masonry buildings. Six wall–slab joint specimens and eight grooved wall specimens, induced by partial failure of wall–slab joints, were tested under monotonic vertical and horizontal loading. Numerical models were then developed, verified, and used to perform a parametric study. It was found that the wall–slab joints failed in various modes, that is, slab failure, wall failure, and slab pullout failure. The grooved wall could fail in bending or in compression. Analyses indicated that the collapse of unreinforced masonry buildings with simply supported precast concrete floor slabs develops in both vertical and horizontal directions. However, the collapse of unreinforced masonry buildings with continuous cast in situ concrete floor slabs is prone to develop only in the vertical direction, resulting in improved progressive collapse resistance.

Author(s):  
Amaryllis Mouyiannou ◽  
Andrea Penna ◽  
Maria Rota ◽  
Francesco Graziotti ◽  
Guido Magenes

The seismic capacity of a structure is a function of the characteristics of the system as well as of its state, which is mainly affected by previous damage and deterioration. The cumulative damage from repeated shocks (for example during a seismic sequence or due to multiple events affecting an unrepaired building stock) affects the vulnerability of masonry buildings for subsequent events. This paper proposes an analytical methodology for the derivation of state-dependent fragility curves, taking into account cumulated seismic damage, whilst neglecting possible ageing effects. The methodology is based on nonlinear dynamic analyses of an equivalent single degree of freedom system, properly calibrated to reproduce the static and dynamic behaviour of the structure. An application of the proposed methodology to an unreinforced masonry case study building is also presented. The effect of cumulated damage on the seismic response of this prototype masonry building is further studied by means of nonlinear dynamic analyses with the accelerograms recorded during a real earthquake sequence that occurred in Canterbury (New Zealand) between 2010 and 2012.


1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 219-228

This section contains information about several buildings that had been seismically rehabilitated before the Northridge Earthquake. Refer to Chapter 5 for reconnaissance information concerning retrofitted tilt-up-wall buildings and Chapter 8 for retrofitted unreinforced masonry buildings. Additionally, there is one retrofitted precast concrete parking garage discussed in Chapter 4. Undoubtedly, many more buildings have been retrofitted than are presented here, but building departments generally do not keep easily accessible records that identify retrofits, so data is difficult to gather. Seismic strengthening should be specifically identified in computer-based building department databases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document