Decisions and attitudes regarding participation and proxy in clinical trials among patients with impaired cognitive function

Dementia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 2049-2061
Author(s):  
S Stormoen ◽  
IM Tallberg ◽  
O Almkvist ◽  
M Eriksdotter ◽  
E Sundström

Background Medical decision-making capacity is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Medical decision-making capacity depends on many different cognitive functions and varies due to situation and cognitive, social, and emotional status of the patient. Our aim was to analyze dementia patients’ capacity to estimate risks and benefits in different clinical trials and determine how cognitive decline affects their attitude toward possible participation and proxy consent. Methods Groups: Alzheimer’s disease (n = 20), mild cognitive impairment (n = 21) and healthy controls (n = 33). Two hypothetical clinical trials, a standardized interview and three visual analogue scales were used to investigate decisions, estimations, reasoning, and attitudes. Results A general positive attitude toward participation in clinical trials was shown among all groups. Both patients and controls motivated possible participation as “own-benefit” in the low-risk trial and to “help-others” in the high-risk trial. Individuals who accepted to participate in the high-risk trial scored lower in medical decision-making capacity in comparison to participants who would not have participated (p < .01). Patients in the Alzheimer’s disease but not mild cognitive impairment and healthy control groups underestimated risks and overestimated benefits in the high-risk/low-benefit trial (p < .05). A family member was most frequently chosen as possible proxy (91%). Conclusions Medical decisions and research consent should be interpreted with caution in patients who are already in early stages of dementia, as the patients’ acceptance to participate in high-risk trials may be due an insufficient decisional capacity and risk analysis, accelerated by a general desire to make good to society. We emphasize the use of a standardized tool to evaluate medical decisional capacity in clinical research.

Neurology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 69 (15) ◽  
pp. 1528-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Okonkwo ◽  
H. R. Griffith ◽  
K. Belue ◽  
S. Lanza ◽  
E. Y. Zamrini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv Thalén ◽  
Katarina Heimann Mühlenbock ◽  
Ove Almkvist ◽  
Maria Eriksdotter ◽  
Erik Sundström ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. S137-S138
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Marson ◽  
Justin Huthwaite ◽  
Roy Martin ◽  
Randall Griffith ◽  
Britt Anderson ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 71 (19) ◽  
pp. 1474-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. C. Okonkwo ◽  
H. R. Griffith ◽  
J. N. Copeland ◽  
K. Belue ◽  
S. Lanza ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zahra Ayati ◽  
Guoyan Yang ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Ayati ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Emami ◽  
Dennis Chang

Abstract Background Saffron (stigma of Crocus sativus L.) from Iridaceae family is a well-known traditional herbal medicine that has been used for hundreds of years to treat several diseases such as depressive mood, cancer and cardiovascular disorders. Recently, anti-dementia property of saffron has been indicated. However, the effects of saffron for the management of dementia remain controversial. The aim of the present study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of saffron in treating mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Methods An electronic database search of some major English and Chinese databases was conducted until 31st May 2019 to identify relevant randomised clinical trials (RCT). The primary outcome was cognitive function and the secondary outcomes included daily living function, global clinical assessment, quality of life (QoL), psychiatric assessment and safety. Rev-Man 5.3 software was applied to perform the meta-analyses. Results A total of four RCTs were included in this review. The analysis revealed that saffron significantly improves cognitive function measured by the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sums of Boxes (CDR-SB), compared to placebo groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between saffron and conventional medicine, as measured by cognitive scales such as ADAS-cog and CDR-SB. Saffron improved daily living function, but the changes were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were reported in the included studies. Conclusions Saffron may have the potential to improve cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, due to limited high-quality studies there is insufficient evidence to make any recommendations for clinical use. Further clinical trials on larger sample sizes are warranted to shed more light on its efficacy and safety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document