Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-657
Author(s):  
Stefanos Giannopoulos ◽  
Sheila Ghanian ◽  
Sahil A. Parikh ◽  
Eric A. Secemsky ◽  
Peter A. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
Random Effects Modeling ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal lesions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to January 2020 to identify randomized trials and observational studies presenting data on the effectiveness and safety of DCBs in the treatment of femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal lesions. A meta-analysis utilizing random effects modeling was conducted to investigate primary patency and all-cause mortality at 12 months; the results are reported as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes were procedural success, bailout stenting, target lesion revascularization (TLR), reocclusion, major amputation, wound healing, and major adverse limb events. Results: Twenty-six studies, 12 retrospective and 14 prospective, comprising 2108 CLTI patients treated with DCBs for femoropopliteal (n=1315) or infrapopliteal (n=793) lesions were analyzed. The average lesion lengths were 121±44 and 135±53 mm, respectively. The overall 12-month all-cause mortality and major amputation rates were 9% (95% CI 6% to 13%) and 5% (95% CI 2% to 8%), respectively. Primary patency rates were 82% (95% CI 76% to 87%) and 64% (95% CI 58% to 70%), respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated no difference between DCB and balloon angioplasty in terms of primary patency, TLR, major amputation, or mortality over 12 months. However, patients with infrapopliteal lesions undergoing DCB angioplasty did have a significantly lower risk for reocclusion (10% vs 25%; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.70, p=0.002). Conclusion: DCB angioplasty of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in patients with CLTI results in acceptable 12-month patency rates, although comparative data have not shown a patency benefit for infrapopliteal lesions. The 12-month mortality rate of DCB vs balloon angioplasty was not significantly different, but studies with longer-term outcomes are necessary to determine any association between DCB use and mortality in patients with CLTI.

Long-term mortality and patency after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in the hemodialysis circuit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2022 ◽  
pp. 112972982110701
Author(s):  
Yunfeng Li ◽  
Zhenwei Shi ◽  
Yunyun Zhao ◽  
Zhanjiang Cao ◽  
Zhengli Tan
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose: To compare all-cause mortality and primary patency with drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) compared with plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) in people with hemodialysis-related stenosis. Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from November 1966 to February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the use of DCBA versus PBA for stenosis in hemodialysis circuits. Data extracted from the articles were integrated to determine all-cause mortality, target lesion primary patency (TLPP), circuit access primary patency (CAPP), 30-day adverse events, and technical success for the two approaches. We performed meta-analysis on these results using a fixed-effects model to evaluate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) where I2 < 50% in a test for heterogeneity, or a random-effect model if otherwise. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. Results: Sixteen RCTs of 1672 individuals were included in our meta-analysis, of which 839 individuals received DCBA and 833 received PBA. The pooled outcome showed no statistical difference between DCBA and PBA in all-cause mortality at 6 months (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.72–2.32, p = 0.39, I2 = 4%), 12 months (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.68–1.53, p = 0.91, I2 = 0%), and 24 months (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.87–2.57, p = 0.15, I2 = 0%), 30-day adverse events (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.30–3.98, p = 0.90, I2 = 66%), and technical success (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.02–1.92, p = 0.16, I2 = 65%). The DCBA had significantly better outcomes versus PBA in TLPP at 6 months (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.84–3.04, p < 0.001, I2 = 44%) and 12 months (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.22–2.56, p = 0.002, I2 = 56%), and CAPP at 6 months (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.21–3.54, p = 0.008, I2 = 67%) and 12 months (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.29–2.15, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Conclusion: In hemodialysis circuit stenosis, DCBA appears to have similar safety but greater efficacy than PBA.

scholarly journals Drug‐Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Dysfunction: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenyu Liu ◽  
Matthew Wolfers ◽  
Bint‐e Zainab Awan ◽  
Issa Ali ◽  
Adrian Michael Lorenzana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularization ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background Both drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and conventional plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) can be implemented to treat hemodialysis dysfunction. The present study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these 2 approaches by conducting a meta‐analysis of available randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were queried from establishment to January 2021. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials including 877 and 875 patients in the DCB and PBA groups, respectively, were included in the present meta‐analysis. Target lesion primary patency, circuit patency, target lesion revascularization, and mortality were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported with 95% CIs. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot and Egger test. Target lesion primary patency was higher among patients who underwent DCB (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 2.13–4.03], P <0.001 at 6 months; OR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.53–3.99], P <0.001 at 1 year). Also, the DCB group had a higher dialysis circuit patency at 6 months (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.56–3.77 [ P <0.001]) and 1 year (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.22–3.00 [ P =0.005]). Compared with the PBA group, the DCB group had lower odds of target lesion revascularization during follow‐up (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23–0.82], P =0.001 at 6 months; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.32–1.73], P =0.490 at 1 year). The OR of mortality was comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.42–3.33 [ P =0.760]) and 1 year (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58–1.48 [ P =0.750]). Conclusions Based on evidence from 18 randomized controlled trials, DCB angioplasty is superior to PBA in maintaining target lesion primary patency and circuit patency among patients with dialysis circuit stenosis. DCB angioplasty also reduces target lesion revascularization with a similar risk of mortality compared with PBA.

scholarly journals SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF DRUG COATED BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR PERIPHERAL ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION. A META-ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1150
Author(s):  
Waqas Ullah ◽  
Mohamed Zghouzi ◽  
Bachar Ahmad ◽  
Yasar Sattar ◽  
Zeeshan Sattar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Long Infrapopliteal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aljoscha Rastan ◽  
Marianne Brodmann ◽  
Tanja Böhme ◽  
Roland Macharzina ◽  
Elias Noory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Target Vessel Revascularization ◽  
Infrapopliteal Artery ◽  
Directional Atherectomy ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials show no beneficial impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy alone on the technical and clinical outcomes of infrapopliteal artery lesions in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of directional atherectomy (DA) plus DCB angioplasty versus DCB alone in treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, 2-center trial comparing the performance of DA+DCB and DCB alone in treatment of 80 patients with de novo infrapopliteal artery lesions. The primary study end point was the 6-month primary patency of the target lesion detected by angiography and duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included clinically driven target vessel revascularization, amputation rates, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class at 1 year. A core laboratory provides independent analyses for all scheduled and unscheduled duplex ultrasound examinations and angiographies, and a research institute ensured independent data collection. Results: The mean target lesion length was 179.7±98.2 mm. Nine patients (11.3%) died during the follow-up period. At 6 months, primary patency was 49% (n=18) with DA+DCB versus 34% (n=12) with DCB alone ( P =0.241), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization was 8% (n=3) versus 14% (n=5; P =0.475), respectively. At 1 year, the TLR rates were 30% (n=10) versus 43% (n=12; P =0.308), the median in Rutherford-Becker class was 2 (0.25–5) versus 5 (0.25–5; P =0.329), and amputation rates were 22% (n=8) versus 32% (n=11; P =0.618) in the DA+DCB group and the DCB group, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions with DA+DCB versus DCB alone leads to comparable clinical and technical results at 6 months and 1 year. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01763476.

Endovascular salvage of failing arterio-venous fistulas utilising sirolimus eluting balloons: Six months results from the ISABELLA trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110670
Author(s):  
Tjun Y Tang ◽  
Shereen XY Soon ◽  
Charyl JQ Yap ◽  
Ru Yu Tan ◽  
Suh Chien Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Pilot Clinical Study ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Subject Dropout

Background: Aim of this pilot clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) for improving failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) patency in Asian haemodialysis patients. Methods: Prospective single-centre, multi-investigator, non-consecutive, non-blinded single arm trial. Forty end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional AVF underwent SEB angioplasty between May and November 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to SEB angioplasty. Endpoints of interest included target lesion primary patency and circuit access patency and safety through 30 days. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 month and were followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 6 months. Results: There was one subject dropout so final n = 39 patients (mean age 65.0 ± 11.9; males = 26 (66.7%)) and n = 43 target lesions treated. Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (24/39; 61.5%) and most common target lesion was in the juxta-anastomosis (24/43; 54.5%). There was 100% technical and procedural success. There were no adverse events related to the SEB. Target lesion primary patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 39/41 (95.1%) and 28/39 (71.8%) respectively. Access circuit patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 35/37 (94.6%) and 22/35 (62.9%) respectively. There were 3 (7.7%) deaths all attributable to patients’ underlying co-morbidities. Conclusions: Fistuloplasty using the novel Selution SLR™ SEB for dysfunctional AVF circuits seems a safe and effective modality in Asian haemodialysis patients at 6 months but larger randomised controlled studies are required now to determine its true efficacy against plain balloon angioplasty.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty in treatment of total occlusions with severe femoropopliteal lesions: An additional analysis from the AcoArt I study

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812095366
Author(s):  
Guoyi Sun ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Senhao Jia ◽  
Jiwei Zhang ◽  
Baixi Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularization ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusions ◽  
Late Lumen Loss ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Objectives Femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions are challenging to treat, and evidence of the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty for long femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion lesions is limited. We compared the midterm outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions. Methods In total, 95 patients from the AcoArt I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01850056) with ≥5-cm femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion lesions were enrolled in this post-hoc subset analysis (drug-coated balloon, n = 50; POBA, n = 45). The primary endpoints were primary patency and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 24 months. The secondary endpoints were late lumen loss at six months and binary restenosis, major adverse events (composite of death and target limb amputation), change in the Rutherford class, and the ankle-brachial index at 24 months. Results Demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics were matched (mean lesion length, 20 cm). The six-month late-lumen loss rate was lower in the drug-coated balloon than POBA group (0.18 ± 0.81 vs. 1.34 ± 0.94 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). The 24-month primary patency rate was significantly higher in the drug-coated balloon than POBA group (53.85% vs. 17.50%, respectively; P < 0.001). The CD-TLR rate in the drug-coated balloon and POBA groups was 12.77 and 45.24%, respectively ( P = 0.002). The 24-month overall mortality rate in the drug-coated balloon and POBA groups was 12.77% and 6.98%, respectively ( P = 0.360), with no device- or procedure-related deaths. One major amputation had occurred in each group by the 24-month follow-up. Conclusion The paclitaxel drug-coated balloon shows better primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization than POBA at 24 months after treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (≥5 cm) lesion.

Effectiveness of the Pulsar-18 self-expanding stent with optional drug-coated balloon angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions – the BIOFLEX PEACE All-Comers Registry

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lichtenberg ◽  
Frank Breuckmann ◽  
Veronika Kramer ◽  
Stefan Betge ◽  
Sebastian Sixt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Nitinol Stent ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Summary. Background: Previous studies showed favorable results after treatment of femoropopliteal lesions with the Pulsar-18 self-expanding (SE) nitinol stent. The objective of this registry was to evaluate whether these results will be confirmed in a real-world setting with varying stenting strategies. Patients and methods: In this prospective, observational trial, 160 patients with 186 femoropopliteal lesions were treated with the Pulsar-18 SE nitinol stent at 9 German sites. Mean lesion length was 116 ± 103 mm, and 41.9 % of the lesions were moderately or heavily calcified. Eighty lesions were concomitantly treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB). Main effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, and main safety outcome was freedom from the composite of device or procedure related death, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days and 6 months. Results: Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency was 89.1 %, 67.3 %, and 57.1 % at 6, 12, and 24 months. Freedom from TLR was 95.5 %, 91.4 %, and 85.2 % at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Lesions, which were additionally treated with DCB (plus DCB-group), were longer (150 versus 82 mm on average, p < 0.0001), and associated with lower primary patency estimates than those without DCB angioplasty (stent-only-group) (log-rank p = 0.006). However, there was no difference in freedom from TLR between groups (log-rank p = 0.542). Improvement by ≥ 1 Rutherford category was achieved in 84.8 %, 81.0 %, and 81.7 % of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Walking distance and patient-reported pain improved persistently through 24 months (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic improvement was achieved in 68.2 %, 73.7 %, and 70.7 % of the patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: The Pulsar-18 self-expanding nitinol stent with optional drug-coated balloon angioplasty can be considered an efficacious and safe therapy option for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease.

scholarly journals Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Iida ◽  
Yoshimitsu Soga ◽  
Kazushi Urasawa ◽  
Shigeru Saito ◽  
Michael R. Jaff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Japanese Cohort ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of the MDT-2113 (IN.PACT Admiral) drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of de novo and native artery restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with an uncoated balloon in a Japanese cohort. Methods: MDT-2113 SFA Japan ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01947478) is an independently adjudicated, prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial that randomized (2:1) 100 patients (mean age 73.6±7.0 years; 76 men) from 11 Japanese centers to treatment with DCB (n=68) or PTA (n=32). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, including mean lesion length (9.15±5.85 and 8.89±6.01 cm for the DCB and PTA groups, respectively). The primary effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and freedom from restenosis as determined by duplex ultrasonography. The safety endpoint was a composite of 30-day device- and procedure-related death and target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization within 12 months. Results: Patients treated with DCBs exhibited superior 12-month primary patency (89%) compared to patients treated with PTA (48%, p<0.001). The 12-month CD-TLR rate was 3% for DCB vs 19% for PTA (p=0.012). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths, major amputations, or thromboses in either group. Quality-of-life measures showed sustained improvement from baseline to 12 months in both groups. Conclusion: Results from the MDT-2113 SFA Japan trial showed superior treatment effect for DCB vs PTA, with excellent patency and low CD-TLR rates. These results are consistent with other IN.PACT SFA DCB trials and demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this DCB for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in this Japanese cohort.

scholarly journals Angioplasty for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas: a meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials compared paclitaxel-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Yang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Kui Cai ◽  
Yufang Chen ◽  
Congying Xia
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neointimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty

Abstract Background Stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) due to neointimal hyperplasia is one of the most common causes of hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction. Treating patients with dysfunctional AVF with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may potentially improve outcomes. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of DCB angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty by pooling evidence from the most recent randomized controlled trials. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane central databases. Two independent researchers screened the article, extracted interest and evaluated included studies for risk of bias. Pooled estimation was conducted in terms of 6-month target-lesion primary patency (TLPP) and target-lesion reintervention (TLR), as well as other outcomes. Results were expressed with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 4 RCTs were identified and included in the meta-analyses, with 911 participants. There was no significant increase in rates of 6-month TLPP (OR 1.63, 95%CI 0.39–6.79, p = 0.35), or decrease in 6-month TLR (OR 0.45, 95%CI 0.17–1.19 p = 0.07) in patients who received DCB as compared to those who received conventional balloon angioplasty. Similarly, we found no difference in the 6-month access circuit primary patency and reinvention between the two groups. Conclusion There was no evidence supporting that DCB has a statistically significant higher rate of TLPP and lower rates of TLR in the treatment of dysfunctional AVF than conventional balloon angioplasty. However, DCB was non-inferior to conventional balloon angioplasty in terms of safety. Therefore, further study is needed to clarify whether DCB angioplasty can benefit hemodialysis patients with dysfunction AVF.

Plain versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in arteriovenous fistula and graft stenosis: An umbrella review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110052
Author(s):  
Miltos K Lazarides ◽  
Eleni Christaina ◽  
George A Antoniou ◽  
Christos Argyriou ◽  
Gregory Trypsianis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Graft Stenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses

An umbrella review was performed to synthesize the evidence from systematic reviews/meta-analyses of clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) vs. conventional balloon angioplasty in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts stenosis. Medline (via PubMed) and SCOPUS databases were searched up to July 15th 2020. All meta-analyses that enrolled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCB with plain balloons in AVFs and grafts were included. Re-analysis of original data was performed assessing predictive intervals (PI). Quality of the included meta-analyses was assessed using AMSTAR score. Eight meta-analyses were included and four clinical outcomes [target lesion primary patency (TLPP), circuit primary patency, mortality, complication rate] derived from 14 RCTs, were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the TLPP in meta-analyses providing data purely from autologous AVFs. Significant benefits regarding TLPP and circuit primary patency at 3, 6, and 12-months in favor of PCB were reported in four meta-analyses mixing AVFs and grafts; however when PI were assessed, in all but one meta-analysis these included the null value, indicating no significant benefit. In only one meta-analysis significant difference of TLPP at 12-months in favor of PCB was noticed. (Odds Ratio 0.0009 PI: 0.28-0.85) No mortality difference was noticed in four meta-analyses providing data up to 24 months. In conclusion this overview revealed a modest benefit of using PCB angioplasty compared to plain angioplasty in AVFs and graft stenosis. No increased mortality was noticed in the PCB group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document