Critical Thinking and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Education at a Small University: Program Evolution and Lessons Learned

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-55
Author(s):  
Lyn W. Freeman ◽  
Derek Welton

Patient use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has resulted in diverse educational initiatives in universities around the country. This article describes the creation of a CAM continuing-education pilot program delivered to a diverse group of practicing medical professionals in Alaska. Program strengths include emphasis on critical thinking strategies, identification of cultural barriers, a multidisciplinary medical team approach, and program development with limited funding. A minor degree in CAM evolved from the lessons learned with the continuing education program. The minor degree in CAM is in its pilot phase and is evidence based. The University of Alaska at Anchorage is exploring the minor in CAM as an online offering to graduate students seeking master’s degrees in public health and potentially as part of degree completion programs. The online approach will make the minor degree accessible to Alaskans across the state and in remote villages.

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 946-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor S. Sierpina ◽  
Ronald Schneeweiss ◽  
Moshe A. Frenkel ◽  
Robert Bulik ◽  
Jack Maypole

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. e239-e248
Author(s):  
Vladimíra Čavojová ◽  
Selin Ersoy

Abstract Background While previous research has shown that trust in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is linked with other unfounded beliefs (e.g. paranormal phenomena or pharmaceutical conspiracies) and that analytic thinking can help alter these beliefs, the role of the ability to evaluate evidence as a protective factor has not been established yet. Methods A cross-sectional design with a hundred participants was used with self-report data from questionnaires and performance test. The dependent variables were the belief in CAM and use of CAM. Predictor variables were scientific reasoning (measured by Scientific Reasoning Scale), critical thinking dispositions (measured by Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument; UF-EMI), religious beliefs (measured by Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire), gender and age. Results Scientific reasoning and religious faith independently predicted belief in alternative medicine, while the role of scientific reasoning in actual reported use of CAM diminished after religious faith, gender and age were introduced to the model. Conclusion The results highlight the fact that it is not enough to appeal to the general critical thinking of people, but we need to teach them some practical skills that would help them to evaluate evidence in other, health-unrelated, contexts as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document