A Girl With Multiple Disabilities Increases Object Manipulation and Reduces Hand Mouthing Through a Microswitch-Based Program

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O'Reilly ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Robert Didden ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 714-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Mark F. O'Reilly ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Robert Didden ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Mark F. O’Reilly ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Doretta Oliva ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 478-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O'Reilly ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Robert Didden ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.E. Lancioni ◽  
D. Oliva ◽  
M.F. O'Reilly

This study further tested the applicability of a robot with people with severe multiple disabilities. The robot was used to help two adults with blindness, deafness, motor disabilities, and low functioning levels ambulate and transport objects and enable them to reach a couch on which they could sit and put away the objects. Both adults learned to use the robot, succeeded in transporting and putting away objects, and achieved robot-assisted ambulation times of about 31 minutes per session.


2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio E. Lancioni ◽  
Nirbhay N. Singh ◽  
Mark F. O'Reilly ◽  
Jeff Sigafoos ◽  
Doretta Oliva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Holyfield ◽  
Sydney Brooks ◽  
Allison Schluterman

Purpose Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is an intervention approach that can promote communication and language in children with multiple disabilities who are beginning communicators. While a wide range of AAC technologies are available, little is known about the comparative effects of specific technology options. Given that engagement can be low for beginning communicators with multiple disabilities, the current study provides initial information about the comparative effects of 2 AAC technology options—high-tech visual scene displays (VSDs) and low-tech isolated picture symbols—on engagement. Method Three elementary-age beginning communicators with multiple disabilities participated. The study used a single-subject, alternating treatment design with each technology serving as a condition. Participants interacted with their school speech-language pathologists using each of the 2 technologies across 5 sessions in a block randomized order. Results According to visual analysis and nonoverlap of all pairs calculations, all 3 participants demonstrated more engagement with the high-tech VSDs than the low-tech isolated picture symbols as measured by their seconds of gaze toward each technology option. Despite the difference in engagement observed, there was no clear difference across the 2 conditions in engagement toward the communication partner or use of the AAC. Conclusions Clinicians can consider measuring engagement when evaluating AAC technology options for children with multiple disabilities and should consider evaluating high-tech VSDs as 1 technology option for them. Future research must explore the extent to which differences in engagement to particular AAC technologies result in differences in communication and language learning over time as might be expected.


2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 541-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Holt ◽  
S Baagøe ◽  
F Lillelund ◽  
S P Magnusson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document