Addressing the General Education Curriculum in General Education Settings with Students with Severe Disabilities

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Ballard ◽  
Stacy K. Dymond
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
General Education ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Education Curriculum ◽  
General Education Curriculum ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Education Classrooms

This systematic literature review examined research on stakeholders’ beliefs about addressing the general education curriculum in general education classrooms with students with severe disabilities (SD). The investigation was limited to studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 1997 and 2015. Ten articles were identified and then analyzed using an inductive coding approach and thematic analysis. Secondary data analysis revealed four major themes centered on (a) method of access, (b) type of curriculum, (c) barriers/concerns, and (d) benefits. Overall, stakeholders were found to perceive social inclusion as more important than involvement and progress in the general education curriculum for students with SD. Stakeholders also perceived numerous challenges around facilitating access to the general education curriculum in general education classrooms.

What Is Different About Deaf Education? The Effects of Child and Family Factors on Educational Services

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Luft
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
General Education ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Deaf Education ◽  
Family Factors ◽  
Educational Services ◽  
Education Curriculum ◽  
General Education Curriculum ◽  
K 12 ◽  
General Education Classrooms

Deaf education is characterized by several distinctive aspects, beginning with qualities unique to deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children and their families. Consisting of approximately 1.2% of the special education K-12 population, educational and disability systems often struggle to meet the unique challenges that these children and their families present. The result is that services and practices may be atypical and unlike those found to be successful with other populations. Despite new technological and personnel accommodations, far greater numbers placed in general education classrooms, and access to the general education curriculum, these children remain unable to perform commensurate with their abilities or at levels equivalent to their peers either with or without disabilities. Achievement has improved little over four decades, further attesting to the complexity of successfully mitigating the effects of early childhood hearing loss and that educating DHH children is different.

Curricular Philosophies Reflected in Individualized Education Program Goals for Students With Complex Support Needs

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-294
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Kurth ◽  
Elissa Lockman-Turner ◽  
Kathryn Burke ◽  
Andrea L. Ruppar
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Individualized Education Program ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
General Education Curriculum ◽  
K 12

Abstract Individualized education program (IEP) goals are meant to be personalized to address the unique needs of students with disabilities, while also reflecting the student's grade-aligned general education curriculum. IEP goals describe what, how, and where students with disabilities are taught, and reflect the curriculum used to provide instruction. In this study, we analyzed how IEP goals align with the different curricular philosophies for students with severe disabilities. Using a sample of 88 IEPs for students with complex support needs (i.e., severe disabilities) in Grades K-12, we found most goals (57%) reflect curricular philosophies of the 1970s–1990s (i.e., developmental, functional, and social inclusion) eras, with only 26% of IEP goals representative of modern curricular philosophies (i.e., grade-aligned academic content). We also found secondary-aged students were less likely to have grade-aligned academic goals compared to elementary-aged students. We offer implications for ensuring individualization and goals reflecting skills needed for the 21st century.

Instructional Costs of Inclusive Schooling

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Salisbury ◽  
Arthur Chambers
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
General Education ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Professional Staff ◽  
Archival Data ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Annual Basis ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities ◽  
Schooling Practices ◽  
Inclusive Schooling

Relatively little is known about the relative costs of inclusion, particularly as they compare to more prevalent self-contained and/or segregated out-of-district placement options. This investigation was conducted to report longitudinal cost data associated with one district's evolution toward more inclusive schooling practices. Results of archival data analysis revealed: (a) that District costs were significantly less on an annual basis relative to comparable costs for out-of-district services; (b) a significant increase in the number of students with severe disabilities over the 5-year period, with District costs still well below that of out-of-district services; (c) a doubling in contractual (related services) costs over the 5-year period, linked most directly to the dramatic increase in the number of students with more intensive needs; and (d) a significant increase in the number of and reliance on para-professional staff for supporting classified and nonclassified students in general education.

A Comparison of Instructional Context, Teacher Behavior, and Engaged Behavior for Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education and Self-Contained Elementary Classrooms

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent R. Logan ◽  
Elizabeth B. Keefe
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Elementary Classrooms ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Teacher Behavior ◽  
Student Response ◽  
Functional Activities ◽  
Teacher Attention ◽  
Instructional Context ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Education Classrooms

This article presents results from an observational study comparing instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for 15 students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms and 15 students with severe disabilities in self-contained classrooms. The observational data system was the Code for Instruction and Student Academic Response–Mainstream Version. The major significant differences were that students in general education classrooms received a greater proportion of their instruction through academic rather than functional activities and received more one-to-one instruction and teacher attention than did students in self-contained classrooms. No significant differences were found between the settings for student response. The most interesting finding may be that so few differences were found between general education and self-contained classrooms.

Inclusion and the Challenge of Assimilation for Teachers of Students with Severe Disabilities

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Peters Goessling
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
General Education ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Cultural Dissonance ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Inclusive Settings ◽  
Changing Roles ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Education Classrooms

The perceptions of fourteen teachers from fourteen different public schools about their changing roles and responsibilities as they moved into inclusive settings with students with severe disabilities were explored in this qualitative study. It discusses their experiences of cultural dissonance as they left the segregated culture of special education and attempted to assimilate themselves into general education classrooms, grades K-8. Their dilemmas, doubts, and hopes for the future are discussed as well as the challenges that attempted cultural assimilation presents for special educators.

scholarly journals The Effects of Peer Delivered Self-Monitoring Strategies on the Participation of Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education Classrooms

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy H. Gilberts ◽  
Martin Agran ◽  
Carolyn Hughes ◽  
Michael Wehmeyer
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Peer Tutors ◽  
School Students ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Strategies ◽  
Survival Skills ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Education Classrooms

This study investigated the effects of self-monitoring instruction delivered by peer tutors on the occurrence of academic survival skills displayed by five middle school students with severe disabilities. We employed a multiple baseline across subjects design. Instruction was provided in general education content classes. The students were taught to indicate on a self-recording sheet if they performed each of 11 skills. Data revealed an increase in the percentages of occurrence of survival skills across all students. Also, their general education teachers indicated that they observed a positive change for four of the five students. All students indicated that they believed that they were part of the class and reported an increase in their classroom participation. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Teachers' Perspectives on Literacy Instruction for Students with Severe Disabilities Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 100-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Ruppar ◽  
Stacy K. Dymond ◽  
Janet S. Gaffney
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Literacy Instruction ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
General Education Curriculum ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities ◽  
Teachers Perspectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers' perspectives on the appropriate skills and settings for literacy instruction, the factors influencing their decisions about literacy instruction, and the barriers to literacy instruction in general education classrooms. A sample of special education teachers (n = 69) of students taking the Illinois Alternate Assessment were surveyed, and results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results indicate that teachers prefer to provide life-skills-linked literacy instruction in special education classrooms and consider student characteristics and features of the general education curriculum when making these decisions. Also, the setting had a significant effect on teachers' rankings of preferred literacy skills to teach. Teachers may not understand how to adapt literacy content or how access to literacy instruction in a variety of contexts may benefit their students with severe disabilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document