Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832110175
Author(s):  
Muhammed Enes Gunduz ◽  
Kevin Pacheco-Barrios ◽  
Camila Bonin Pinto ◽  
Dante Duarte ◽  
Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez ◽  
...  

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups ( F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.

2020 ◽  
Vol 131 (10) ◽  
pp. 2375-2382
Author(s):  
K. Pacheco-Barrios ◽  
CB. Pinto ◽  
FG. Saleh Velez ◽  
D. Duarte ◽  
ME. Gunduz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiru M Annaswamy ◽  
Kanchan Bahirat ◽  
Gargi Raval ◽  
Yu-Yen Chung ◽  
Balakrishnan Prabhakaran

Objective: This report describes the details of Mr. MAPP, a virtual mirror therapy system and the results of a clinical feasibility and evaluation study of a pilot sample of patients with history of lower limb amputation and phantom limb pain. Materials and Methods: Mr. MAPP system uses a Kinect V2 RGB-D camera to capture the patient, generates a live interactive 3D model, and incorporates it into a virtual exergame. Mr. MAPP mirrors their preserved limb and allows participants to visualize their amputated limb virtually and perform their prescribed exercise program. Mr. MAPP creates a digital diary of their therapy sessions by recording game performance and errors. Ten consecutive patients with history of limb loss and phantom pain were targeted for this pilot study. They received a Mr. MAPP system and a laptop for home use for 1-month. Outcome measures including pain intensity and pain interference measured on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) as well as functional outcomes measured on Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) were obtained at baseline, and after 1-month. Results: Seven participants were enrolled, out of which four completed the study. The study was temporarily suspended due to restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 public health emergency. In-game performance data showed a trend towards improvement in most participants. Compared to baseline, NRS and MPQ scores at 1-month showed no clear trends. PSFS scores improved for 1 participant and remained unchanged for others. Conclusion: Gamified home exercises performed via a novel, mixed-reality system, Mr. MAPP, using which virtual mirror therapy was delivered, is feasible and has potential to improve pain and pain related function in patients with lower limb amputations and phantom limb pain.


2007 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. S29
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Takufumi Yanagisawa ◽  
Satoru Oshino ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
Tetsu Goto ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (14-15) ◽  
pp. 882-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisol A Hanley ◽  
Mark P Jensen ◽  
Dawn M Ehde ◽  
Amy J Hoffman ◽  
David R Patterson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Di Rollo ◽  
Stefano Pallanti

Phantom limb pain is very common after limb amputation and is often difficult to treat. The motor cortex stimulation is a valid treatment for deafferentation pain that does not respond to conventional pain treatment, with relief for 50% to 70% of patients. This treatment is invasive as it uses implanted epidural electrodes. Cortical stimulation can be performed noninvasively by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The stimulation of the hemisphere that isn't involved in phantom limb (unaffected hemisphere), remains unexplored. We report a case of phantom limb pain treated with 1 Hz rTMS stimulation over motor cortex in unaffected hemisphere. This stimulation produces a relevant clinical improvement of phantom limb pain; however, further studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of the method and the stimulation parameters.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlick A.C. Pereira ◽  
Tom Moore ◽  
Liz Moir ◽  
Tipu Z. Aziz

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yves Lazorthes ◽  
Jean-Christophe Sol ◽  
Pascal Cintas ◽  
Jean-Albert Lotterie ◽  
Jean-Claude Verdie ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Griffin ◽  
Sean Curran ◽  
Annie W.Y. Chan ◽  
Sacha B. Finn ◽  
Chris I. Baker ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and purposeResearch indicates that mirror therapy reduces phantom limb pain (PLP). Objectives were to determine when mirror therapy works in those who respond to treatment, the relevance of baseline PLP to when pain relief occurs, and what pain symptoms respond to mirror therapy.MethodsData from two independent cohorts with unilateral lower limb amputation were analyzed for this study (n = 33). Mirror therapy consisted of 15-min sessions in which amputees performed synchronous movements of the phantom and intact legs/feet. PLP was measured using a visual analogue scale and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire.ResultsThe severity of PLP at the beginning of treatment predicted when pain relief occurred. Those with low baseline PLP experienced a reduction (p < 0.05) in PLP by session 7 of treatment, those with medium baseline PLP experienced pain relief by session 14 of treatment, and those with high baseline PLP experienced pain relief by session 21 of treatment. Mirror therapy reduced throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, aching, tender, splitting, tiring/exhausting, and punishing-cruel pain symptoms.ConclusionThe degree of PLP at baseline predicts when mirror therapy relieves pain.ImplicationsThis article indicates that the degree of baseline PLP affects when mirror therapy relieves pain: relief occurs by session 7 in patients with low PLP but by session 21 in patients with high PLP. Clinicians should anticipate slower pain relief in patients who begin treatment with high levels of pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document