Frailty Assessed by the Forecast is a Valid Tool to Predict Short-Term Outcome after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Author(s):  
Adrian R. Kobe ◽  
Alexander Meyer ◽  
Hassan Elmubarak ◽  
Jörg Kempfert ◽  
Jovana Pavicevic ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio A Medranda ◽  
Kunal Brahmbhatt ◽  
Khaled Salhab ◽  
Richard K Schwartz ◽  
Stephen Green

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) frequently accompanies aortic stenosis (AS). Several studies have reported that certain patients see improvement in their MR following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) alone using earlier generation valves. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors and short-term outcome impact of MR in patients undergoing TAVR using all generation valves across all risk groups. Methods: In this retrospective, study from 2012-2019, we reviewed data on 1,626 low, intermediate and high-risk patients who underwent TAVR. Included were patients with baseline MR who underwent transfemoral TAVR. We excluded prior valve replacement and aborted TAVR. Our primary outcome was persistence or worsening of baseline MR post-TAVR. Additional endpoints included an inpatient composite (intensive care unit length of stay >24 hours, post-TAVR length of stay >2 days and inpatient death), 30-day composite (30-day death or 30-day readmission) and 1-year composite (1-year death or readmission). Results: Of the 1,626 patients screened, 552 had significant baseline MR (>moderate), which improved in 79.7% of patients. Female patients, those with higher right ventricular systolic pressures and those who underwent TAVR using earlier generation valves were more likely to have persistence or worsening of significant baseline MR. Patients whose significant baseline MR (>moderate) persisted or worsened, had higher rates (92.2 vs. 84.1%, p=0.0343) of our inpatient composite and higher rates (36.6% vs. 25.5%, p=0.0243) of our 1-year composite when compared to patients whose significant baseline MR (>moderate) improved post-TAVR. Conclusions: Our study identifies certain clinical characteristics, which could help identify the subset of patients who may require closer post-procedural follow-up and warrant possible staged mitral valve intervention post-TAVR across all risk groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document