Impacts of COVID-19 on sexual behaviour in Britain: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID)

ObjectivesPhysical restrictions imposed to combat COVID-19 dramatically altered sexual lifestyles but the specific impacts on sexual behaviour are still emerging. We investigated physical and virtual sexual activities, sexual frequency and satisfaction in the 4 months following lockdown in Britain in March 2020 and compared with pre-lockdown.MethodsWeighted analyses of web panel survey data collected July/August 2020 from a quota-based sample of 6654 people aged 18–59 years in Britain. Multivariable regression took account of participants’ opportunity for partnered sex, gender and age, to examine their independent associations with perceived changes in sexual frequency and satisfaction.ResultsMost participants (86.7%) reported some form of sex following lockdown with physical activities more commonly reported than virtual activities (83.7% vs 52.6%). Altogether, 63.2% reported sex with someone (‘partnered sex’) since lockdown, three-quarters of whom were in steady cohabiting relationships. With decreasing relationship formality, partnered sex was less frequently reported, while masturbation, sex toy use and virtual activities were more frequently reported. Around half of all participants perceived no change in partnered sex frequency compared with the 3 months pre-lockdown, but this was only one-third among those not cohabiting, who were more likely to report increases in non-partnered activities than those cohabiting. Two-thirds of participants perceived no change in sexual satisfaction; declines were more common among those not cohabiting. Relationship informality and younger age were independently associated with perceiving change, often declines, in sexual frequency and satisfaction.ConclusionsOur quasi-representative study of the British population found a substantial minority reported significant shifts in sexual repertoires, frequency and satisfaction following the introduction of COVID-19 restrictions. However, these negative changes were perceived by some more than others; predominantly those not cohabiting and the young. As these groups are most likely to experience adverse sexual health, it is important to monitor behaviour as restrictions ease to understand the longer term consequences, including for health services.

Perceptions of firearm-related harm among US adults living in firearm-owning households: a nationally representative study

Decision-making on having firearms at home may be contingent on perceptions of the likelihood of their negative and positive outcomes. Using data from a nationally representative survey (n=4030) conducted during 30 July 2019 to 11 August 2019, we described how US adults living in firearm-owning households perceived the relative likelihood of firearm-related harm by injury intent (‘accidentally harm self or someone else with a gun’, ‘injure self on purpose with a gun’ and ‘injure someone else on purpose with a gun’) for groups at risk of compromised decision-making (children; adolescents and individuals with mental health issues, substance use disorders or cognitive impairment). We found that US adults living in firearm-owning households believe that unintentional firearm injuries are more likely than intentional self-inflicted or assault-related firearm injuries, despite evidence to the contrary. Prior evidence indicates that communicating risk in relative terms can motivate behaviour change; therefore, findings from this study might helpfully inform health communications around firearm safety.

Health Literacy in the Canton of Zurich: First Results of a Representative Study

Managing health information and services is difficult for nearly half of the population in Switzerland. Low health literacy has been shown to result in poorer health and health outcomes as well as a higher utilization of health services. To date, studies on health literacy in Switzerland have focused on a national level. However, Switzerland is a federal state with 26 cantons and a strongly decentralized health system. Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand how health literacy is distributed within the population of the canton of Zurich specifically, and to develop methods to determine whether an individual has a higher or lower level of health literacy. There were a total of 1000 participants in this representative study. Data was collected by an adapted version of the HLS-EU-Q47 and additional sociodemographic questions. The majority (56%) of the reported difficulties concerned accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying health information. The findings confirm that health literacy follows a social gradient, whereby financially deprived individuals and those with a low educational level report lower health literacy. The need for action to strengthen the health literacy of these population groups is therefore urgent. Interventions should pay particular attention to these vulnerable groups and tailor resolutions to their needs and preferences.

Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Buffering Effect of Activity Participation

Caregiving activities often lead to positive and negative appraisal for caregivers. Caregivers may limit social participation due to caregiving activities. Changes in level of activity participation could have profound consequences for caregiver’s valence. However, little is known about how activity participation could moderate the association between these caregiving appraisals and emotional valence. Data came from the National Study of Caregiving (Round 1 and 2), a nationally representative study of caregivers. Referencing Lawton’s two-factor model (1990), we examined both the level and changes in activity restriction interacting with positive and negative caregiving appraisals to predict both valence across two waves. Consistent with two factor models, findings revealed level and changes in activity restriction moderated the relationship between caregiving appraisal and outcomes for both valences. These findings highlight the role of activity restriction as a target to reduce negative valence and improve positive valence for caregivers.

Impact of Vision and Hearing Impairment on Cognition and Loneliness: Evidence From the Mexican Health and Aging Study

Poor vision and hearing have been associated with lower cognitive function and greater social isolation (i.e., loneliness) among older adults. However, this evidence is based largely on data from non-Hispanic populations. Therefore, we investigated whether self-reported vision and hearing was associated with cognitive function and loneliness in a nationally-representative study of Mexican adults aged 50 and older in Wave 3 of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. The final sample included 12,426 participants. The majority were female (58%), and the mean age was 67. Self-reported vision and hearing status were categorized as excellent-very good [ref], good, and fair-poor. Measures for global cognition, memory, and non-memory cognition were calculated using z-scores based on nine cognitive tests. Participants who reported frequently feeling a lack of companionship, left out, or isolated were categorized as feeling lonely. All analyses controlled for age, sex, and years of education. Participants with fair-poor vision had lower global (β= -0.06, p <.01), memory (β= -0.07, p <.01), and non-memory cognition (β= -0.06, p <.01) than participants with excellent-very good vision. In addition, participants with fair-poor hearing had higher non-memory cognition (β= 0.03, p <.05) but not global cognition (β=0.02) or memory (β=0.001). Fair-poor vision (OR=1.53, 95% CI=1.25-1.87) but not fair-poor hearing (OR=1.16, 95% CI=0.97-1.38) was associated with higher odds of being lonely. Poor vision may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for lower cognition and loneliness among Mexican adults. Future research should incorporate robust measures of sensory health and investigate the longitudinal association between vision, cognition, and loneliness.

Day and Night, Night and Day: Associations of Sleep and Activity Variability and Mortality

Self-reported sleep duration has been repeatedly found to predict mortality. Actigraphy has recently been added to population-based studies to provide more accurate sleep measures. Actigraphy sleep duration has not consistently predicted mortality, but actigraphy measures of sleep disruption measures are generally found to be predictive of mortality for older adults. A few studies have more fully used actigraphy data and constructed variables to summarize 24-hour activity patterns, which have also predicted mortality. In this study, we use a nationally representative study of Americans aged 61 – 91 to examine the associations between mortality and actigraphy-derived measures of variability, for both sleep and 24-hour activity patterns. We use 72-hour wrist actigraphy data from a substudy of the 2010/11 round of the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) linked to the National Death Index (NDI) to establish 5-year mortality. Sleep variability was represented by sleep fragmentation and the standard deviation of wake and bed times. Intraday variability and between day (interday) variability described the 24-hour activity patterns. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for sociodemographic confounders and average daytime activity. In general, more variability was associated with increased death hazard for all measures. Fragmentation (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: [1.01, 1.07], p = 0.01), standard deviation of bedtimes (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.31], p = 0.02), and intraday variability (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: [0.98, 1.43], p = 0.07) showed the strongest associations. This study suggests that both consistent sleep and 24-hour activity patterns are associated with better prospective health.