Patient Adherence With At-Home Hand and Wrist Exercises: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Video Versus Handout Format

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110527
Author(s):  
Gregory R. Toci ◽  
Anna Green ◽  
Nailah Mubin ◽  
Casey Imbergamo ◽  
Francis Sirch ◽  
...  

Background: Patient adherence is important for maximizing patient outcomes. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine patient adherence and confidence in home therapy exercises of the hand and wrist at multiple time points when distributed by either paper handout or video. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized in orthopedic clinics to either the handout or video exercise group. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years old. Questionnaires were electronically distributed each week for 4 weeks following enrollment. Questionnaires assessed the frequency of exercise performance, percentage of exercises utilized, and confidence in performing the exercises correctly. The handout and video groups were compared via 2-sample t tests for continuous data and χ2 tests for categorical data. Results: Of the 89 patients enrolled, 71 patients responded to the initial follow-up survey (80% of randomized patients), and 54 of these patients (76%) completed all surveys at each time point. The handout group (37 patients) and the video group (34 patients) had no differences in response rate or demographics. There were no differences in frequency, exercise utilization rate, or confidence in performing exercises between groups at week 1. However, the video group reported higher exercise utilization and confidence than the handout group at subsequent time points. Conclusions: Video-format distribution of home therapy exercises is superior to that of paper handout distribution for the distal upper extremity rehabilitation. Patients in the video group utilized more exercises and had higher confidence in completing them correctly following initiation of the exercise program.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Luiza Exel ◽  
Paulo Soares Lima ◽  
Christiano Bertoldo Urtado ◽  
Almir Vieira Dibai‐Filho ◽  
Claudia Lucio Vilanova ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 756-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avery J Evans ◽  
Kevin E Kip ◽  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Kennith F Layton ◽  
Mary L Jensen ◽  
...  

BackgroundWe present the results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in treating vertebral body compression fractures.MethodsPatients with vertebral body compression fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were pain (0–10 scale) and disability assessed using the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Outcomes were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure.Results115 subjects were enrolled in the trial with 59 (51.3%) randomly assigned to kyphoplasty and 56 (48.7%) assigned to vertebroplasty. Mean (SD) pain scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, and 1 year for kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty were 7.4 (1.9) vs 7.9 (2.0), 4.1 (2.8) vs 3.7 (3.0), 3.4 (2.5) vs 3.6 (2.9), and 3.0 (2.8) vs 2.3 (2.6), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). Mean (SD) RMDQ scores at baseline, 3 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year were 17.3 (6.6) vs 16.3 (7.4), 11.8 (7.9) vs 10.9 (8.2), 8.6 (7.2) vs 8.8 (8.5), 7.9 (7.4) vs 7.3 (7.7), 7.5 (7.2) vs 6.7 (8.0), respectively (p>0.05 at all time points). For baseline to 12-month assessment in average pain and RMDQ scores, the standardized effect size between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty was small at −0.36 (95% CI −1.02 to 0.31) and −0.04 (95% CI −1.68 to 1.60), respectively.ConclusionsOur study indicates that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty appear to be equally effective in substantially reducing pain and disability in patients with vertebral body compression fractures.Trial registration numberNCT00279877.


Trials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glauber Sá Brandão ◽  
Luís Vicente Franco Oliveira ◽  
Glaudson Sá Brandão ◽  
Anderson Soares Silva ◽  
Antônia Adonis Callou Sampaio ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuying Li ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Juan Ni ◽  
Yushan Ma

Abstract Background: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) frequently occurs during recovery in patients who undergo intra-operative urinary catheterization distress. We conducted this study to compare the effect of intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion for preventing CRBD. Methods: 120 patients undergoing elective open abdominal hysterectomy and hysteromyoma requiring urinary bladder catheterization were randomly allocated into three groups of 40 each. Group L received a 2 mg/kg lidocaine bolus followed by infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h; Group D received a 0.5 mg/kg dexmedetomidine bolus followed by infusion of 0.4 mg/kg/h; Group C received a bolus and infusion of normal saline of equivalent volume. The incidence and different severity (mild, moderate, and severe) of CRBD were assessed on arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit at 0, 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively. Results: The incidence of CRBD was significantly lower in Group L and Group D compared with Group C at 0, 1, and 2 h. However, there was no significant difference among the three groups regarding the different severity of CRBD at all time points. The requirement of rescue tramadol for CRBD was lower in group L and group D than in group C. The incidence of sedation was significantly higher in Group D compared to Group L and Group C, though no difference in other adverse effects was observed. Conclusions: Intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion reduced the incidence of CRBD as well as the additional tramadol requirement for CRBD, but had no effect on the different severity of CRBD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-147
Author(s):  
Kristine L. Cece ◽  
Jane E. Chargot ◽  
Micheleen Hashikawa ◽  
Melissa A. Plegue ◽  
Katherine J. Gold

Background and Objectives: While video discharge instructions have been shown to improve retention of information and patient satisfaction, data are limited regarding patient perceptions of video tools. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess self-rated comprehension and overall satisfaction with video versus face-to-face neonatal discharge instructions in first-time mothers. Results: Video instructions were no different from face-to-face instructions, though there was a nonsignificant increase in confidence in caring for their newborn in the video group. Conclusions: Broader use of technology may allow for a more standardized approach to patient education and improve efficiency for clinicians, without compromising patient satisfaction and confidence in caring for themselves and their dependents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document