Testosterone Therapy Fails to Improve Clinical Pain Perception in Opioid-Induced Androgen Deficiency

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
E. H. Nichols ◽  
S. S. Basaria
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Lee ◽  
Gerald Brock ◽  
Jack Barkin ◽  
Nathan Bryson ◽  
Matthew A. Gronski ◽  
...  

Introduction: Natesto®, testosterone nasal gel (TNG), is a testosterone therapy (TTh) indicated for adult male hypogonadism.1 This study allowed titration decisions to be based on physicians’ assessment of patient symptoms. Methods: Hypogonadal males on active topical testosterone therapy (TThE) or naive to any form of testosterone therapy (TThN) were treated with 22 mg TNG daily (11 mg twice daily) for 90 days. Titration was determined by the physician at Day 90 wherein the dose was increased to 33 mg daily if symptoms were not properly managed. Total testosterone (TT) levels were collected at Day 90 and 120 and the quantitative Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (qADAM) symptom questionnaire was administered on Days 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120. Results: At study endpoint, 77.0% of all patients were in the normal TT range. Mean qADAM scores increased from 30.8 at baseline to 35.5 (6.6) at Day 90. Physician assessments resulted in 37% patients being up-titrated for an additional 30 days, however, qADAM scores did not change significantly at the higher dose. Conclusions: The majority of patients achieved the normal range of testosterone with TNG when physicians based their titration decision on an assessment of symptoms. Sexual function and energy-related symptoms were predictive of improvements resulting from treatment. These symptoms were the most relevant indicators for physicians in making decisions relating to titration.


2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1995-2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalender Bhasin ◽  
Glenn R. Cunningham ◽  
Frances J. Hayes ◽  
Alvin M. Matsumoto ◽  
Peter J. Snyder ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 3;16 (3;5) ◽  
pp. E247-E256
Author(s):  
Kyung Bong Yoon

Background: Evidence for opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) has been shown in animal and human studies, but the clinical implications of this phenomenon remain unclear. Objectives: We examined whether cancer patients taking opioids differ in their sensitivity to a clinical pain stimulus using a local anesthetic injection compared to those not taking opioids. We also evaluated the effect of the opioid dose, duration of opioid therapy, and patients’ pain severity and functional status on this clinical pain stimulus. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: University outpatient department for interventional pain management, Republic of Korea. Methods: Eighty-two cancer patients including 20 patients not taking opioids (non-opioid group) and 62 taking opioids (opioid group) who were scheduled for an interventional procedure were enrolled in this study. Patients received a standardized subcutaneous injection of lidocaine prior to a full dose of local anesthetic (LA). Before the injection, patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire and were asked to rate their current pain using numeric rating scales. Immediately following the injection, LA injection-specific pain was evaluated using pain intensity, unpleasantness, and behavior pain scores. Results: LA injection-specific pain intensity, unpleasantness, and behavior pain score were significantly higher in the opioid group compared with the non-opioid group (P < 0.001). In the opioid group, these post-injection pain scores were higher in patients taking high-dose opioids than those taking low doses (P < 0.05). In addition, we observed a strong correlation between the baseline BPI pain interference score and the LA injection-specific pain score (r = 0.695, P < 0.001). Limitations: This study is limited by its sample size and observational design. Various opioid medications, which were not standardized, may have inadvertently biased our results. Finally, the pain assessed by a brief stimulus does not fully reflect disturbances in endogenous pain inhibitory processes. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that opioid medication is an important contributing factor to pain perception accompanying LA injection, and cancer patients using high-dose opioids may be highly susceptible to hyperalgesic responses to this clinical stimulus. We also suggest that the possible presence of OIH may be intensified among cancer patients with poor physical and psychosocial functional status. Key words: Adverse effects; analgesics, opioid; anesthetics, local; cancer; hyperalgesia; injections, subcutaneous; nociceptive pain; pain measurement; pain perception; quality of life


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathis Grossmann ◽  
Thomas Hugh Jones

Clinicians commonly encounter middle-aged and older men who present with functional hypogonadism, i.e. with clinical features compatible with androgen deficiency and lowered serum testosterone, but without evidence of organic hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis pathology. Whether, and when, testosterone therapy should be offered to such men remains uncertain and controversial, in part due to lack of definitive evidence regarding long term patient-important health outcomes with testosterone treatment. In this debate, we address this controversy and provide two opposing point of views on the role of testosterone treatment in older men with functional hypogonadism


Pain ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. France ◽  
Francis J. Keefe ◽  
Charles F. Emery ◽  
Glenn Affleck ◽  
Janis L. France ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document