Evolution and clinical relevance of common iliac artery seal zone after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergana T Taneva ◽  
Alejandro González García ◽  
Ana Begoña Arribas Díaz ◽  
Yasmina Baquero Yebra ◽  
Konstantinos P Donas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Iliac Artery ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Iliac Arteries ◽  
Radiological Data ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objective Data in literature suggest iliac artery dilatation and endograft retraction as complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. However, mainly older generation endografts were included. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the distal sealing zone chronological changes after endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts. Methods Clinical and radiological data of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2010 and December 2013 were reviewed. Measurements were made using volumetric reconstructions in the first and last available computed tomography angiography. Endpoints of the study were the presence of iliac dilatation and retraction of the endograft. Association with distal oversizing and sealing length was analyzed. Results Consecutive patients with a total of 52 common iliac arteries were included in the study (mean age 74.9 ± 6.8 years, four women (7.7%)). The mean follow-up was 3.1 years. The mean iliac diameter increased from 15.5 to 17.1 mm ( p < .001) in the first control computed tomography angiography and to 18.7 mm ( p < .001) in the last available computed tomography angiography. No endograft (Endurant by Medtronic (24/52; 46%), Excluder de Gore (23/52; 44%), Zenith by Cook (5/52; 9%)) was associated with dilatation ( p = .066) or iliac retraction ( p = .591). Two type Ib endoleaks were found (3.8%) and successfully treated with distal graft extension. An iliac branch retraction of ≥5 mm was identified in seven cases (13%). Iliac arteries treated with limbs of ≥24 mm in diameter dilated significantly more than the rest of limbs (5.37 mm versus 3.12 mm; p = .022). In the last available imaging, iliac dilatation was ≥20% in 28 cases (53.8%) and had exceeded the diameter of the implanted endograft in 20 cases (38.4%). Iliac dilatation (OR 15.11 per mm, p = .025) was identified as a risk factor for retraction ≥5 mm. Conclusion Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction are common findings after endovascular aneurysm repair despite the use of new generation endografts. Optimizing the iliac sealing length and meticulous computed tomography angiography surveillance are recommended especially in case of use ≥24 mm iliac stent-grafts to prevent possible complications.

scholarly journals Unfavorable iliac artery anatomy causing access limitations during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: application of the endoconduit technique

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-324
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Gibin Jaldin ◽  
Marcone Lima Sobreira ◽  
Regina Moura ◽  
Matheus Bertanha ◽  
Jamil Víctor de Oliveira Mariaúba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iliac Artery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Arterial Access ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is already considered the first choice treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Several different strategies have been used to address limitations to arterial access caused by unfavorable iliac artery anatomy. The aim of this report is to illustrate the advantages and limitations of each option and present the results of using the internal endoconduit technique and the difficulties involved.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms by fenestrated and branched endografts†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Gallitto ◽  
Gianluca Faggioli ◽  
Rodolfo Pini ◽  
Chiara Mascoli ◽  
Stefano Ancetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our objective was to report the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with endografts. METHODS Between January 2010 and April 2018, patients with TAAAs, considered at high surgical risk for open surgery and treated by Cook-Zenith fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair, were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively analysed. The early end points were 30-day/hospital mortality rate, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day cardiopulmonary and nephrological morbidity. Follow-up end points were survival, patency of target visceral vessels and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (male: 77%; mean age: 73 ± 7 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4: 58/42%) were enrolled. Using Crawford’s classification, 43 (49%) were types I–III and 45 (51%) were type IV TAAAs. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65 ± 15 mm. Custom-made and off-the-shelf endografts were used in 60 (68%) and 28 (32%) cases, respectively. Five (6%) patients had a contained ruptured TAAA. The procedure was performed in multiple steps in 42 (48%) cases. There was 1 (1%) intraoperative death. Five (6%) patients suffered spinal cord ischaemia with permanent paraplegia in 3 (3%) cases. Postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 7 (8%) and 12 (14%) patients, respectively. Worsening of renal function (≥30% of baseline level) was detected in 11 (13%) cases, and 2 (2%) patients required haemodialysis. The 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 5% and 8%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 36 ± 22 months. Survival at 12, 24 and 36 months was 89%, 75% and 70%, respectively. The patency of target visceral vessels at 12, 24 and 36 months was 92%, 92% and 92%, respectively. Freedom from reinterventions at 12, 24 and 36 months was 85%, 85% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The endovascular repair of TAAAs with fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair is feasible and effective with acceptable technical/clinical outcomes at early/midterm follow-up.

Iliac Branch Devices With Standard vs Fenestrated/Branched Stent-Grafts: Does Aneurysm Complexity Produce Worse Outcomes? Insights From the pELVIS Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 910-916
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Spanos ◽  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
Martin Scheerbaum ◽  
Konstantinos P. Donas ◽  
Martin Austermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Aortoiliac Disease ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Aneurysm Morphology ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Registry Database

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of iliac branch devices (IBD) used in combination with standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs with fenestrated/branched EVAR (f/bEVAR) to treat complex aortoiliac aneurysms. Materials and Methods: The pELVIS Registry database containing the outcomes of IBD use at 8 European centers was interrogated to identify all IBD procedures that were combined with either standard EVAR or f/bEVAR. Among 669 patients extracted from the database, 629 (mean age 72.1±8.8 years; 597 men) had received an IBD combined with standard EVAR vs 40 (mean age 71.1±8.0 years; 40 men) who underwent f/bEVAR with an IBD. The mean aortic aneurysm diameters were 46.4±13.3 mm in the f/bEVAR patients vs 45.0±15.5 mm in the standard EVAR cases. The groups were similar in terms of baseline clinical characteristics and aneurysm morphology. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare patient survival, IBD occlusion, type III endoleak, and aneurysm-related reinterventions in follow-up. The estimates are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Technical success was 100% in the f/bEVAR+IBD group and 99% in the EVAR+IBD group (p=0.85). The 30-day mortality was 0% vs 0.5%, respectively (p=0.66), while the 30-day reintervention rates were 7.5% vs 4.1% (p=0.31). The mean follow-up was 32.1±21.3 months for f/bEVAR+IBD patients (n=30) and 35.5±26.8 months for EVAR+IBD patients (n=571; p=0.41). The 12-month survival estimates were 93.4% (95% CI 93.2% to 93.6%) in the EVAR+IBD group vs 93.6% (95% CI 93.3% to 93.9%) for the f/bEVAR+IBD group (p=0.93). There were no occlusions or type III endoleaks in the f/bEVAR+IBD group at 12 months, while the estimates for freedom from occlusion and from type III endoleak in the EVAR+IBD group were 97% (95% CI 96.8% to 97.2%) and 98.5% (95% CI 98.4% to 98.6%), respectively. The 12-month estimates for freedom for aneurysm-related reintervention were 93% (95% CI 92.7% to 93.3%) in the EVAR+IBD group vs 86.4% (95% CI 85.9% to 86.9%) in the f/bEVAR+IBD patients (p=0.046). Conclusion: Treatment of complex aortoiliac disease with f/bEVAR+IBD can achieve equally good early and 1-year outcomes compared to treatment with IBDs and standard bifurcated stent-grafts, except for a somewhat higher reintervention rate in f/bEVAR patients.

scholarly journals Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1503-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico Bastos Gonçalves ◽  
Koen M. van de Luijtgaarden ◽  
Sanne E. Hoeks ◽  
Johanna M. Hendriks ◽  
Sander ten Raa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Additional Imaging ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

scholarly journals Short and Intermediate Outcome of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysmal Repair, A multicenteric Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 1494-1498
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hosny Sayed ◽  
Mohammed Ali Hassan ◽  
Ahmed Samir Hosny ◽  
Hisham Rashid ◽  
Mohamed Hosni El Dessoki
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Rapid Evolution ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Aneurysm Morphology ◽  
Multicenter Prospective Study ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND: The availability of aortic stent-grafts has permitted an obvious change in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). For elective cases open surgical repair has been widely superseded by the use of stent-graft. With the rapid evolution of the endovascular technology, a significant development in stent-graft techniques was achieved in conjunction with a better understanding of how to utilize stent-grafts. METHODS: A multicenter prospective study in which 49 patients were enrolled, they underwent an elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedure for infrarenal AAA in two different institutions, Kasr Al-ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University and King’s College Hospital in London, the selected patients were followed up for 6 months after the procedure. Data relating to demographics and pre-operative comorbidities were recorded. Aneurysm morphology was reviewed by computed tomography angiography scans. Clinical data was collected through operative records and afterward through outpatient clinic follow-up sessions. RESULTS: Overall survival was 94% over a period of 6 months calculated using KaplanMeier Survival Curve. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair resulted in fewer perioperative deaths. This study provides insight into clinical parameters that can be used to stratify patients’ post-EVAR surveillance and need for re-intervention and it came to the conclusion that EVAR could be considered as the standard repair for uncomplicated infrarenal AAA.

Feasibility and Safety of Sac Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate in Emergency Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms or Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 828-835
Author(s):  
Shota Ohba ◽  
Masashi Shimohira ◽  
Takuya Hashizume ◽  
Masahiro Muto ◽  
Kengo Ohta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iliac Artery ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Iliac Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of sac embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and iliac artery aneurysm (IAA) in comparison to EVAR without sac embolization. Materials and Methods: Between February 2012 and December 2019, among 44 consecutive patients with ruptured AAA or IAA, 29 underwent EVAR. Of these, 22 patients (median age 77.5 years; 18 men) had concomitant sac embolization using NBCA; the remaining 7 patients (median age 88 years; 6 men) underwent EVAR without sac embolization and form the control group. The technical success, clinical success (hemodynamic stabilization), procedure-related complications, and mortality were compared between the groups. Results: All EVAR procedures and embolizations were successful. The clinical success rates in the NBCA and control groups were 95% (21/22) and 71% (5/7), respectively (p=0.14). There was no complication related to the procedure. Type II endoleak occurred in 4 of 21 patients (19%) in the NBCA group vs none of the control patients. One patient (5%) died in the NBCA group vs 3 (43%) in the controls (p=0.034). Conclusion: Sac embolization using NBCA in emergency EVAR appears to be feasible and safe for ruptured AAA and IAA.

Internal iliac coverage during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is a safe option: A preliminary study

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Kansal ◽  
Prasad Jetty ◽  
Dalibor Kubelik ◽  
George Hajjar ◽  
Andrew Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Iliac Artery ◽  
Internal Iliac Artery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
External Iliac Artery ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Internal Iliac

Endovascular aneurysm repairs lacking suitable common iliac artery landing zones occasionally require graft limb extension into the external iliac artery, covering the internal iliac artery origin. The purpose of this study was to assess incidence of type II endoleak following simple coverage of internal iliac artery without embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair. Three hundred eighty-nine endovascular aneurysm repairs performed by a single surgeon (2004–2015) were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients underwent simple internal iliac artery coverage. Type II endoleak was assessed from operative reports and follow-up computed tomography imaging. No patient suffered type II endoleak from a covered internal iliac artery in post-operative computed tomography scans. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 9 years. No severe pelvic ischemic complications were observed. In conclusion, for selected cases internal iliac artery coverage without embolization is a safe alternative to embolization in endovascular aneurysm repairs, where the graft must be extended into the external iliac artery.

Aortomonoiliac Endovascular Grafting: Difficult Solutions to Difficult Aneurysms

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Thompson ◽  
Robert D. Sayers ◽  
Ahktar Nasim ◽  
Jonathan R. Boyle ◽  
Guy Fishwick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Complication ◽  
Graft Infection ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Infrarenal Aorta ◽  
Iliac Arteries ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Femoral Vessels ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To describe a refined technique for aortomonoiliac endograft exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods: A tapered aortomonoiliac graft was prepared from an 8-mm thin-walled expanded polytetrafluoroethylene tube graft predilated proximally to 35 mm and tapered distally to 15 mm. The proximal graft was sutured to a 5-cm-long, predilated Palmaz stent, which was mounted on a 30-mm balloon and backloaded into a 21F packaging sheath. With the patient under general anesthesia and both common femoral arteries exposed, the endograft was anchored in the infrarenal aorta and subsequently passed into one iliac system, where it was anastomosed to the iliac or femoral vessels. The contralateral common iliac artery was occluded, and an extra-anatomic, femorofemoral, or iliofemoral bypass grafting was performed. Results: Twenty of the 25 AAAs treated to date with this technique have been successful, with aneurysm exclusion achieved in 18 (2 minor distal endoleaks are scheduled for endovascular repair). The technical failures were analyzed, resulting in enhancements to the technique. Complications included 2 early (< 30 days) deaths, 1 case of minor embolization, 1 transient renal failure, 1 pulmonary embolus, and 1 wound infection. The only late complication was a graft infection localized to the groin. Conclusions: Aortomonoiliac endovascular aneurysm repair is effective in patients with AAAs involving the iliac arteries. Short-term results are acceptable, but long-term efficacy must be addressed before this procedure is widely adopted. Technical changes made in response to early learning curve problems have led to a safer, more reliable procedure.

Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using Endurant Stent-Grafts With Bare Balloon-Expandable Stents for Patients With Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyasu Morikage ◽  
Takahiro Mizoguchi ◽  
Yuriko Takeuchi ◽  
Takashi Nagase ◽  
Makoto Samura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Covered Stents ◽  
Acute Renal Dysfunction ◽  
Systemic Complications ◽  
Proximal Neck ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Diameter

Purpose: To evaluate the advantages of chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (chEVAR) using an Endurant stent-graft with uncovered balloon-expandable stents (BES) for patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5±9.0 years; 13 men) who underwent chEVAR using Endurant and uncovered BES between January 2014 and December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The maximum aneurysm diameter was 59.1±11.9 mm, and the proximal neck length was 5.2±2.9 mm. Of the 22 cases, 9 (40%) involved proximal neck angulation and 9 (40%) had a conical neck. Single and double chimneys were performed using BES in 19 and 3 cases, respectively. In 2 cases, an additional self-expanding covered stent was used inside the uncovered BES. Results: The technical success was 91% (20/22) as 2 (9%) cases showed minor type Ia endoleak. No postoperative systemic complications or acute renal dysfunction (Acute Kidney Injury Network classification stage 2 or higher) were observed. The mean radiologic observation period was 16.1±9.6 months, and no aneurysm expansion (>5 mm) was observed during this time. The mean maximum aneurysm diameter decreased to 52.9±10.2 mm (p<0.001 vs preoperative), with an individual mean sac regression of 6.2±5.9 mm. Overall primary chimney stent patency was 100%. One of the 2 cases of intraoperative type Ia endoleak resolved at the 6-month imaging, and no new type Ia endoleaks developed in any cases at follow-up. No additional treatment- or aneurysm-related events were observed. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes of chEVAR using Endurant with uncovered BES have been favorable when covered stents were unavailable, and it can be useful for high-risk patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document