scholarly journals A technique for humeral prosthesis placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-464
Author(s):  
Paul J Cagle ◽  
Wayne Reizner ◽  
Bradford O Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Stem Height ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Recent Trends ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder ◽  
Stem Version

Recent trends have illustrated the benefits of treating displaced fractures of the proximal humerus with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clinical results have demonstrated reliable restoration of function in situations where results following hemiarthroplasty have been variable and difficult to predict. Data have demonstrated landmarks to assist with humeral stem height in hemiarthroplasty. However, intraoperative landmarks to guide placement of the humeral component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty have not been described. In this technique, the superior border of the pectoralis tendon is utilized. A distance of 5.0 cm is used to assist in placement of the most superior aspect of the metallic humeral component and with humeral stem version. This technique can be used as a guide to assist a treating physician in situations where bony fracture and comminution make humeral stem height placement difficult to judge.

Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110193
Author(s):  
Arjun K Reddy ◽  
Jake X Checketts ◽  
B Joshua Stephens ◽  
J Michael Anderson ◽  
Craig M Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures). Results The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%. Conclusion This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.

Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence V. Gulotta ◽  
Dan Choi ◽  
Patrick Marinello ◽  
Zakary Knutson ◽  
Joseph Lipman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

scholarly journals Anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty utilizing a single implant system with a platform stem: A prospective observational study with midterm follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 330-337
Author(s):  
Lindsay Flynn ◽  
Matthew R Patrick ◽  
Christopher Roche ◽  
Joseph D Zuckerman ◽  
Pierre-Henri Flurin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Implant System ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background No studies compare outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with more than five-year follow-up. Methods A multicenter prospectively collected shoulder registry was utilized to review all patients undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty or primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a minimum five-year follow-up utilizing a single platform stem implant system. One-hundred-ninety-one patients received an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and 139 patients received a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients were scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using the simple shoulder test (SST), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES), Constant, and shoulder pain and disability index (SADI) scores as well as range of motion. Radiographs were evaluated for implant loosening or notching. Complications were reviewed. A Student’s two-tailed, unpaired t-test identified differences in preoperative, postoperative, and pre-to-postoperative improvements. Results Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients were significantly older than anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty patients. All patients demonstrated significant improvement in functional metric scores and range of motion following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. There was no difference in final outcome scores between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at midterm follow-up; however, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients demonstrated significantly less motion. Discussion We demonstrate equivalent outcomes with five scoring metrics at mean follow-up of 71.3 ± 14.1 months. Although postoperative scores were significantly greater than preoperative scores for both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients, significant differences in outcome scores between cohorts were not observed.

Early clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Korean population

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1102-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Hun Ji ◽  
Jin-Young Jeong ◽  
Hyun-Seok Song ◽  
Ji-Hoon Ok ◽  
Seok-Jo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Korean Population ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

scholarly journals Analysis of complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Joints ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 62-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Russo ◽  
Giuseppe Rotonda ◽  
Michele Ciccarelli ◽  
Fabio Cautiero
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Fracture Group ◽  
Long Thoracic Nerve ◽  
Secondary Osteoarthritis ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Purpose: the aim of this study was to analyze complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) used to treat different shoulder diseases. Methods: from March 2000 to March 2013, 195 RTSA were implanted by the senior Author. The indications for reverse prosthesis surgery were secondary osteoarthritis (OA) in 49 cases, irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT) in 48 cases, and complex humeral fractures in 75 cases, while 19 were patients requiring surgical revision for first prosthesis implant. We used different prostheses with different designs. Results: the clinical and radiological results of all the patients were analyzed retrospectively at an average follow-up of 7 years. The cases were divided into four groups on the basis of the diagnosis and complications were classified as perioperative, postoperative, or late. The mean total Constant score improved from 28 to 69 points in the OA group; from 21 to 70.8 points in the irreparable RCT group, to 76.4 in the fracture group, and from 16.6 to 59.8 points in the revision group. Scapular notching was observed in 59 cases (30.2%). Thirty-three other complications (16.9%) were observed, namely: hematomas (n=3), instability of the humeral component (n=1), scapular spine fractures (n=2), ulnar nerve deficit (n=2), long thoracic nerve palsy (n=2), deep infections (n=2), periprosthetic fractures (n=6), glenoid fractures (n=2), implant loosening (n=2), anterior deltoid muscle deficiency (n=2) and periarticular heterotopic calcifications (n=9). Conclusions: the rates of complications, especially fractures, reported in the present study were lower than those reported in the current literature. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1555-1559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Gilot ◽  
Andres M. Alvarez-Pinzon ◽  
Thomas W. Wright ◽  
Pierre-Henri Flurin ◽  
Michael Krill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

scholarly journals Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Antegrade Nailing for 3- and 4-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil AMRI ◽  
Rabie AYARI ◽  
Karim LATRECH TLEMSANI ◽  
Achraf ABDENNADHER ◽  
Mohamed BEN SALAH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Complications Rate ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Abstract Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures are prevalent and widespread, accounting for 5% of all fractures, mainly in the elderly osteoporotic patients following a low-level trauma. Three-and four-part fractures represent 13 to 16% of these fractures and are generally associated with a worse prognosis. Depending on the fracture type and the patient status, several therapeutic options would be available ranging from osteosynthesis to arthroplasty. The aim of our study was to compare the functional and radiological results, as well as the complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and anterograde nailing when managing these fractures. Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study was conducted within the orthopedic surgery department of the Military Hospital of Instruction of Tunis, over a period of 42 months, from January 2016 to June 2019 with an average follow-up of 18 months. We included 31 cases of complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients, aged over 65 years, 16 of whom were treated by reverse total arthroplasty and 15 by antegrade nailing. Results: Our patient pool included 8 men and 23 women with a mean age of 73 years, ranging from 65 to 85. A low-energy fall was the main cause of the fractures with the dominant side being affected in 55% of cases. Four-part fractures were predominant representing 68% of the fractures. Constant and DASH scores at the last follow-up were at 68 and 24 respectively. Most patients were satisfied with the outcome of their surgeries, with an overall satisfaction rate of 87%. The complications rate was in accordance with the literature. Functional results in the group treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were better with a lower complications rate. Conclusion: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has become an interesting surgical alternative, as the functional and anatomical results in our study were promising, while elucidating an improved quality of life for our patients. These findings have encouraged us to continue using this technique as a first-line choice for complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document