Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110193
Author(s):  
Arjun K Reddy ◽  
Jake X Checketts ◽  
B Joshua Stephens ◽  
J Michael Anderson ◽  
Craig M Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures). Results The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%. Conclusion This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Eleanor G. Burden ◽  
Timothy J. Batten ◽  
Christopher D. Smith ◽  
Jonathan P. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Aims This systematic review asked which patterns of complications are associated with the three reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthetic designs, as classified by Routman et al, in patients undergoing RTSA for the management of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The three implant design philosophies investigated were medial glenoid/medial humerus (MGMH), medial glenoid/lateral humerus (MGLH), and lateral glenoid/medial humerus (LGMH). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on complication occurrence and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Meta-analysis was conducted on the reported proportion of complications, weighted by sample size, and PROMs were pooled using the reported standardized mean difference (SMD). Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde’s non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020193041). Results A total of 42 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rates of scapular notching were found to be significantly higher in MGMH implants (52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 63)) compared with MGLH ((18% (95% CI 6 to 34)) and LGMH (12% (95% CI 3 to 26)). Higher rates of glenoid loosening were seen in MGMH implants (6% (95% CI 3 to 10)) than in MGLH implants (0% (95% CI 0 to 2)). However, strength of evidence for this finding was low. No significant differences were identified in any other complication, and there were no significant differences observed in PROMs between implant philosophies. Conclusion This systematic review has found significant improvement in PROMS and low complication rates across the implant philosophies studied. Scapular notching was the only complication found definitely to have significantly higher prevalence with the MGMH implant design.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of formal physical therapy following total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter K Edwards ◽  
Jay R Ebert ◽  
Chris Littlewood ◽  
Tim Ackland ◽  
Allan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background Physical therapy is considered routine practice following total shoulder arthroplasty. To date, current regimens are based on clinical opinion, with evidence-based recommendations. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of total shoulder arthroplasty physical therapy programmes with a view to inform current clinical practice, as well as to develop a platform upon which future research might be conducted. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library to March 2018 was complemented by hand and citation-searching. Studies were selected in relation to pre-defined criteria. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results A total of 506 papers were identified in the electronic database search, with only one study showing moderate evidence of early physical therapy promoting a more rapid return of short-term improvement in function and pain. No studies evaluated the effectiveness of physical therapy programmes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Discussion Restoring range of motion and strength following total shoulder arthroplasty is considered important for patients to obtain a good outcome post-surgery and, when applied early, may offer more rapid recovery. Given the rising incidence of total shoulder arthroplasties, especially reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, there is an urgent need for high-quality, adequately powered randomised controlled trials to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes following these surgeries.

scholarly journals Acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C Lau ◽  
Richard Large
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stress Fracture ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Acromial Fracture ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has become the most common method of arthroplasty of the shoulder. The complication of acromial or scapular stress fracture deserves consideration to describe incidence and determine whether prosthetic design or patient factors act as risk factors. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed including the EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results The search returned 565 articles. After exclusion, 25 papers remained. In total, 208 fractures were reported in the literature, with an overall incidence of 5% and stress fractures were more common than post-traumatic ones; 24 fractures underwent osteosynthesis and there were nine revision arthroplasty surgeries. Outcomes worsened after fracture – whether treated with surgery or not. In patients with scapular base fractures, there was an improvement in functional outcome scores after surgery. Heterogeneous reporting of the risk factors prior to fractures, treatment methods and outcomes made recommendations weak. Discussion Acromial stress fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty occurs relatively commonly but is poorly reported in the literature. It is unclear whether immobilisation, fixation or revision arthroplasty is the best treatment, although fixation may offer a better outcome. In future, reports should aim for greater consistency to allow a better understanding of this condition.

Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence V. Gulotta ◽  
Dan Choi ◽  
Patrick Marinello ◽  
Zakary Knutson ◽  
Joseph Lipman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document