The role of acromial morphometry in the development of acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322090676
Author(s):  
Shawn T Yeazell ◽  
Ajith Malige ◽  
Timothy Visser ◽  
Gregory F Carolan

Background Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are expanding, and postoperative acromial stress fractures are a troubling postoperative complication. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in acromial morphometry were present between cohorts with and without this complication. Methods A retrospective review of 101 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures met criteria for the study. A total of eight acromial measurements on preoperative computed tomography scans were performed in axial, coronal, and sagittal views. Postoperative acromial stress fractures were confirmed by computed tomography scan on six patients and classified by fracture type. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test. Results The median acromial thickness at the posterior and lateral half was significantly thinner in the fracture cohort compared to the non-fracture cohort. Fracture and non-fracture cohort measurements demonstrated a median lateral thickness of 6.8 and 8.7 mm (p = 0.010), respectively, and median posterior thickness of 7.6 and 9.5 mm (p = 0.008), respectively. There were no demographic differences between cohorts. Discussion Two acromial measurements (lateral and posterior thickness) were associated with the development of postoperative acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. These findings suggest that a thinner acromion in the lateral and posterior half is a risk factor for an acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2579-2586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Franceschetti ◽  
Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis ◽  
Riccardo Ranieri ◽  
Alessio Palumbo ◽  
Michele Paciotti ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C Lau ◽  
Richard Large

Background The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has become the most common method of arthroplasty of the shoulder. The complication of acromial or scapular stress fracture deserves consideration to describe incidence and determine whether prosthetic design or patient factors act as risk factors. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed including the EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results The search returned 565 articles. After exclusion, 25 papers remained. In total, 208 fractures were reported in the literature, with an overall incidence of 5% and stress fractures were more common than post-traumatic ones; 24 fractures underwent osteosynthesis and there were nine revision arthroplasty surgeries. Outcomes worsened after fracture – whether treated with surgery or not. In patients with scapular base fractures, there was an improvement in functional outcome scores after surgery. Heterogeneous reporting of the risk factors prior to fractures, treatment methods and outcomes made recommendations weak. Discussion Acromial stress fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty occurs relatively commonly but is poorly reported in the literature. It is unclear whether immobilisation, fixation or revision arthroplasty is the best treatment, although fixation may offer a better outcome. In future, reports should aim for greater consistency to allow a better understanding of this condition.


Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Dillon ◽  
Heather A. Prentice ◽  
William E. Burfeind ◽  
Priscilla H. Chan ◽  
Ronald A. Navarro

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Zmistowski ◽  
Michael Gutman ◽  
Yael Horvath ◽  
Joseph A. Abboud ◽  
Gerald R. Williams ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrick M. Knapik ◽  
James E. Voos ◽  
Michael J. Salata ◽  
Robert J. Gillespie

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0221-e0221
Author(s):  
Jason S Lipof ◽  
Richard D. Southgate ◽  
Wakenda K. Tyler ◽  
Susan V. Bukata ◽  
Ilya Voloshin

Orthopedics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. e465-e473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Rachel M. Frank ◽  
Peter N. Chalmers ◽  
Nikhil N. Verma ◽  
Gregory P. Nicholson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document