scholarly journals Specialist palliative and end-of-life care for patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a European perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110422
Author(s):  
Gehan Soosaipillai ◽  
Anjui Wu ◽  
Gino M Dettorre ◽  
Nikolaos Diamantis ◽  
John Chester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Psychological Support ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Background: Specialist palliative care team (SPCT) involvement has been shown to improve symptom control and end-of-life care for patients with cancer, but little is known as to how these have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report SPCT involvement during the first wave of the pandemic and compare outcomes for patients with cancer who received and did not receive SPCT input from multiple European cancer centres. Methods: From the OnCovid repository ( N = 1318), we analysed cancer patients aged ⩾18 diagnosed with COVID-19 between 26 February and 22 June 2020 who had complete specialist palliative care team data (SPCT+ referred; SPCT− not referred). Results: Of 555 eligible patients, 317 were male (57.1%), with a median age of 70 years (IQR 20). At COVID-19 diagnosis, 44.7% were on anti-cancer therapy and 53.3% had ⩾1 co-morbidity. Two hundred and six patients received SPCT input for symptom control (80.1%), psychological support (54.4%) and/or advance care planning (51%). SPCT+ patients had more ‘Do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation’ orders completed prior to (12.6% versus 3.7%) and during admission (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001), with more SPCT+ patients deemed suitable for treatment escalation (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001). SPCT involvement was associated with higher discharge rates from hospital for end-of-life care (9.7% versus 0%, p < 0.001). End-of-life anticipatory prescribing was higher in SPCT+ patients, with opioids (96.3% versus 47.1%) and benzodiazepines (82.9% versus 41.2%) being used frequently for symptom control. Conclusion: SPCT referral facilitated symptom control, emergency care and discharge planning, as well as high rates of referral for psychological support than previously reported. Our study highlighted the critical need of SPCTs for patients with cancer during the pandemic and should inform service planning for this population.

Palliative care in the intensive cardiac care unit

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne Wood ◽  
Maureen Carruthers
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
World Health ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Cardiac Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Cardiac Care Unit

Specialist palliative care services originally focused on improving the quality of life for patients with a diagnosis of cancer in the terminal phase of their illness. However, organizations, such as the World Health Organization, supported by recent national strategies, such as the End of Life Care Strategy (United Kingdom, 2008), promote the early integration of specialist palliative care into the management of patients with incurable disease, irrespective of the diagnosis. The primary goal of the intensive cardiac care unit is to help patients survive acute threats to their lives. However, the suddenness and severity of illness, particularly when associated with an underlying cardiological diagnosis, often means that the provision of optimal specialist palliative care is challenging. This chapter addresses key issues relating to the provision of specialist palliative care in the challenging and complex environment of the intensive cardiac care unit, including symptom control, end of life care, decision making, and communication. The benefits of multidisciplinary working for effective quality improvement in patient care and best support for patients, families/carers, and staff are also addressed. The importance of interdisciplinary working is highlighted, and, by embedding the principles of holistic care into daily practice, the intensive cardiac care unit can ensure that patients and their families/carers receive the support they need in a timely manner from individuals who are well supported in what is often considered to be one of the most challenging medical environments.

Confidence and skills for cystic fibrosis end-of-life care

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002274
Author(s):  
Eva Harris-Skillman ◽  
Stephen Chapman ◽  
Aoife Lowney ◽  
Mary Miller ◽  
William Flight
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

ObjectivesOptimal cystic fibrosis (CF) end-of-life care (EOLC) is a challenge. There is little formal guidance about who should deliver this and how CF multi-disciplinary teams should interact with specialist palliative care. We assessed the knowledge, experience and preparedness of both CF and palliative care professionals for CF EOLC.MethodsAn electronic questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Oxford adult CF and palliative care teams.Results35 of a possible 63 members responded (19 CF team; 16 palliative care). Levels of preparedness were low in both groups. Only 11% of CF and 19% of palliative care team members felt fully prepared for EOLC in adult CF. 58% of CF members had no (21%) or minimal (37%) general palliative care training. Similarly, 69% of the palliative care team had no CF-specific training. All respondents desired additional education. CF team members preferred further education in general EOLC while palliative care team members emphasised a need for more CF-specific knowledge.ConclusionsFew members of either the CF or palliative care teams felt fully prepared to deliver CF EOLC and many desired additional educations. They expressed complementary knowledge gaps, which suggests both could benefit from increased collaboration and sharing of specialist knowledge.

End-of-Life Care in Non-Cancer Illnesses

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley Cousins ◽  
Richard Cassell ◽  
P.-J. Morey
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Disease Trajectory ◽  
Practical Guidance

End-of-life care is that which is provided to patients experiencing a progressive final decline in their lives, usually with a prognosis of less than a year. End-of-life care in non-cancer illness may be challenging for GPs because of the uncertainty about disease trajectory. Patients with non-cancer illness often experience similar symptoms to patients with cancer but for longer hence with a greater impact on quality of life. Only a minority of such patients need specialist palliative care input so the generalist needs to be confident in assessing, treating and supporting patients and families. This article offers suggestions to overcome the challenges along with practical guidance on managing symptoms in the most common non-cancer illnesses.

scholarly journals Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Place in End-of-Life Care: Insights From a Homeless Mobile Palliative Care Team

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 377-377
Author(s):  
Ian Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Provider Perceptions ◽  
Service Environments ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on both those experiencing homelessness (Tsai & Wilson, 2020) and those with life-limiting illnesses (Abbott et al., 2020) is of great public health concern. This presentation details the findings from an organizational case study (Yin, 2014) aimed at investigating COVID-related changes to the service environments in which unhoused palliative care patients receive care. Through ethnographic field observation (Phillippi & Lauderdale, 2017) and interviews with a homeless palliative care team and their community partners (Turner, 2005), findings included 1) decreased staff capacity due to de-congregated care; 2) efforts to extend care in community settings due to relocation barriers; 3) conflict between reducing viral risk and honoring unique population needs; and 4) provider perceptions of COVID-19 as an “equalizer.” Findings illustrate the impact of emergency response within housing and healthcare systems on unhoused patients’ care and offer potential pathways to quality end-of-life care for homeless populations.

scholarly journals End-of-life care in COVID-19: An audit of pharmacological management in hospital inpatients

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1235-1240
Author(s):  
Timothy Jackson ◽  
Katie Hobson ◽  
Hannah Clare ◽  
Daniel Weegmann ◽  
Catherine Moloughney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Higher Doses ◽  
Hospital Inpatients

Background: Hospital clinicians have had to rapidly develop expertise in managing the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 including symptoms common at the end of life, such as breathlessness and agitation. There is limited evidence exploring whether end-of-life symptom control in this group requires new or adapted guidance. Aim: To review whether prescribing for symptom control in patients dying with COVID-19 adhered to existing local guidance or whether there was deviation which may represent a need for revised guidance or specialist support in particular patient groups. Design/setting: A retrospective review of the electronic patient record of 61 hospital inpatients referred to the specialist palliative care team with swab-confirmed COVID-19 who subsequently died over a 1-month period. Intubated patients were excluded. Results: In all, 83% (40/48) of patients were prescribed opioids at a starting dose consistent with existing local guidelines. In seven of eight patients where higher doses were prescribed, this was on specialist palliative care team advice. Mean total opioid dose required in the last 24 h of life was 14 mg morphine subcutaneous equivalent, and mean total midazolam dose was 9.5 mg. For three patients in whom non-invasive ventilation was in place higher doses were used. Conclusion: Prescription of end-of-life symptom control drugs for COVID-19 fell within the existing guidance when supported by specialist palliative care advice. While some patients may require increased doses, routine prescription of higher starting opioid and benzodiazepine doses beyond existing local guidance was not observed.

Pulmonary referrals to specialist palliative medicine: a survey

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003386
Author(s):  
Michael Bonares ◽  
Kenneth Mah ◽  
David Christiansen ◽  
John Granton ◽  
Andrea Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Disease ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Referral Criteria ◽  
Referral Practices ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

ObjectivesPatients with chronic respiratory disease have significant palliative care needs, but low utilisation of specialist palliative care (SPC) services. Decreased access to SPC results in unmet palliative care needs among this patient population. We sought to determine the referral practices to SPC among respirologists in Canada.MethodsRespirologists across Canada were invited to participate in a survey about their referral practices to SPC. Associations between referral practices and demographic, professional and attitudinal factors were analysed using regression analyses.ResultsThe response rate was 64.7% (438/677). Fifty-nine per cent of respondents believed that their patients have negative perceptions of palliative care and 39% were more likely to refer to SPC earlier if it was renamed supportive care. While only 2.7% never referred to SPC, referral was late in 52.6% of referring physicians. Lower frequency of referral was associated with equating palliative care to end-of-life care (p<0.001), male sex of respirologist (p=0.019), not knowing referral criteria of SPC services (p=0.015) and agreement that SPC services prioritise patients with cancer (p=0.025); higher referral frequency was associated with satisfaction with SPC services (p=0.001). Late referral was associated with equating palliative care to end-of-life care (p<0.001) and agreement that SPC services prioritise patients with cancer (p=0.013).ConclusionsPossible barriers to respirologists’ timely SPC referral include misperceptions about palliative care, lack of awareness of referral criteria and the belief that SPC services prioritise patients with cancer. Future studies should confirm these barriers and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to overcome them.

Palliative Care at the End of Life

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Bearison
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Life Decisions

Consider the following advice given to parents whose children are dying in hospitals: “If your child has to die, he can die peacefully. You can make sure he is free of pain. You can make sure that everyone has a chance to say good-bye” (Hilden & Tobin, 2003, p. 3). To offer parents this kind of unconditional assurance (i.e., “You can make sure . . . ”) dismisses the confusing and disturbing realities of actually having to care for a child when it becomes increasingly apparent that curative intent is failing and staff begin to question how best to proceed. The complexity of symptom control in various clinical conditions sometimes precludes children from having peaceful deaths. However, when you read findings from the few palliative care studies that exist (and there are few that consider children as participants), issues of pain management and psychosocial support at the end of life do not seem to be so difficult to resolve. These findings promote ideas that, when satisfactory end-of-life care is not achieved, it is because mistakes were made, staff were inadequately trained, and children thereby were made to suffer unnecessarily. Such ways of thinking in turn lead bereft parents to feel guilty at not having empowered themselves to have taken greater control in the care of their child and to have done the right thing for their child. Although mistakes occur, staff can be better trained, and children might unnecessarily suffer, there are very few guarantees of a comfortable way of dying from medical causes. Most textbooks and studies about end-of-life care simply ignore the messy realities and uncertainties, particularly as they pertain to children and their families. The Report to the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association from its Working Group on Assisted Suicide and End-of-Life Decisions (2003) raised a clarion call to document publicly what it is like, in practical day-by-day terms, for people who die in hospitals and how it affects endof- life decisions for the staff, patients, and families. We all prefer to die quickly, without protracted suffering and pain and without humiliation. Deaths during sleep are particularly preferred.

scholarly journals P135: Canadian emergency medicine residents’ training and competency in end-of-life care: a needs assessment

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S123-S123 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Small Groups ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Formal Training ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Bedside Teaching ◽  
Further Training

Introduction: Emergency Physicians (EPs) face growing numbers of palliative care patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Formal training for EM residents across Canada in this area is not well described. We sought to describe the training Canadian emergency medicine (EM) residents receive in end of life care issues, their attitudes toward it, self-reported knowledge and skills, and the importance they place on further training in this domain. Methods: We conducted an electronic survey across Canada. We collected demographic data, previous education in palliative care, attitudes toward end of life care, and a self-assessment of competency and desires for further training in the main components of palliative care pertinent to EM. We used simple descriptive statistics, a Mann-Whitney test to assess whether previous formal training in palliative care affected current comfort level, and a combination of self-reported knowledge and importance levels placed on key areas. Results: We received 112 responses from 17 different Universities in Canada, with 42% from the CCFP training stream, and 58% from the FRCP stream. Fifty-four percent of respondents had not completed a palliative care rotation during residency or fellowship, which was overwhelming accounted for by FRCP residents (13%, vs. 82% among CCFPs). Having completed formal training in palliative care was significantly associated with general comfort in managing terminally ill patients (p<0.0001). Sixty percent of subjects felt a lack of knowledge and skills was their main limiting factor in providing ideal care for terminally ill patients in the ED. The skills deemed highest priority with lowest comfort level among residents included discussing withdrawing and withholding care, prognosticating, pharmacology and other symptom control. Preferred methods of receiving palliative care teaching included simulation, bedside teaching and small groups. Conclusion: The care of acute illness among palliative care patients is substantially underrepresented in the Canadian EM curriculum, particularly for FRCP trainees. Formal training is associated with increased comfort in caring for patients at the end of their life. High yield teaching interventions could be directed toward knowledge of withdrawing, prognosticating and symptom control. Simulation, bedside teaching and small groups are the preferred method for receiving such teaching.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document