scholarly journals PSMA targeting in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: where are we and where are we going?

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110538
Author(s):  
Anne-Laure Giraudet ◽  
David Kryza ◽  
Michael Hofman ◽  
Aurélie Moreau ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
...  

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on the membrane of most prostate cancer cells and to a lesser extent in normal tissues. Many vectors targeting this protein have been created over the past decade and numerous clinical studies have positively demonstrated the tolerance and efficacy of radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands for PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT). Preliminary results are encouraging that PRLT will become an important addition to the current therapeutic options in a number of settings. Improvement in radiopharmaceutical targeting and combination with other oncological agents are under investigation to further improve its therapeutic efficacy. These encouraging results have led to the development of other therapies using PSMA as a target, such as PSMA–targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, PSMA–targeted antibody drug conjugates, and PSMA–targeted bi-specific T-cell-directed therapy. This narrative review details the current state and advancements in prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting in prostate cancer treatment.

Author(s):  
Mike M. Sathekge ◽  
Frank Bruchertseifer ◽  
Mariza Vorster ◽  
Alfred Morgenstern ◽  
Ismaheel O. Lawal

Abstract Purpose This review discusses the current state of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). With this in-depth discussion on the growing field of PSMA-based alpha therapy (PAT), we aimed to increase the interactions between basic scientists and physician–scientists in order to advance the field. Methods To achieve this, we discuss the potential, current status, and opportunities for alpha therapy and strategies, attempted to date, and important questions that need to be addressed. The paper reviews important concepts, including whom to treat, how to treat, what to expect regarding treatment outcome, and toxicity, and areas requiring further investigations. Results There is much excitement about the potential of this field. Much of the potential exists because these therapies utilize unique mechanisms of action, difficult to achieve with other conventional therapies. Conclusion A better understanding of the strengths and limitations of PAT may help in creating an effective therapy for mCRPC and design a rational combinatorial approach to treatment by targeting different tumor pathways.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 83-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
David C. Smith ◽  
Leonard Joseph Appleman ◽  
Mark T. Fleming ◽  
Arif Hussain ◽  
...  

83 Background: The abundant expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on prostate cancer cells provides a rationale for antibody therapy. PSMA antibody drug conjugate (ADC) is a fully human antibody to PSMA linked to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). It binds PSMA and is internalized and cleaved by lysosomal enzymes releasing free MMAE causing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. We enrolled 70 patients (pts) in a phase II trial of PSMA ADC in taxane-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Pts with progressive mCRPC following taxane and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were eligible. PSMA ADC was administered Q3 week IV for up to eight cycles. Safety, tumor response by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), circulating tumor cells (CTC), imaging, biomarkers and clinical progression were assessed. Dosing was initiated at 2.5 mg/kg and adjustment for tolerability was allowed. Results: Thirty five pts began treatment at 2.5 mg/kg. Due to neutropenia, the remaining 35 pts began at 2.3 mg/kg. All pts received prior docetaxel and abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Forty one percent also received cabazitaxel. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with what was seen in phase I; most common significant AEs were neutropenia (grade 4, 6.7% and 11.4% at 2.3 and 2.5 mg/kg, respectively) and peripheral neuropathy (grade 3 or higher, 6.7% (2.3) and 5.7% (2.5)). Two pts at 2.5 mg/kg died of sepsis. 43% of pts at 2.3 and 37% of pts at 2.5 had declines in CTC from 5 or more to less than 5 cells/7.5 ml blood and 57.1% (2.3) and 74.1% (2.5) had 50% or more CTC declines; 26.1% (2.3) and 16.1% (2.5) had PSA declines of 30% or more thus far. PSA and CTC responses were associated with higher PSMA expression on CTC and lower neuroendocrine (NE) markers. The CTC conversion rate (5 or more to less than 5) was approximately 80% in pts with low NE markers. Prior cabazitaxel or abiraterone and/or enzalutamide did not appear to affect response. Centralized assessments of images by RECIST of all pts are currently planned and will be presented. Conclusions: PSMA ADC at 2.3 mg/kg was generally well tolerated in pts with progressive mCRPC previously treated with taxane. Anti-tumor activity, CTC and PSA reductions were observed at 2.3 and 2.5 mg/kg. Updated safety, tumor response and radiographic assessments from the full cohorts of 2.3 and 2.5 mg/kg will be presented. Testing in taxane naïve pts is also ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01695044.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document