scholarly journals Rapid resolution of left ventricular thrombus with apixaban therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1774521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abeer Berry ◽  
Daniel Brancheau ◽  
Marcel Zughaib
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anterior Wall ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Male Physician ◽  
Rapid Resolution ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus

It is a common medical practice to anticoagulate an asymptomatic left ventricular mural thrombus following an ST-elevation myocardial infarction using a vitamin K antagonist. Novel oral anticoagulants have not been studied extensively in this context, and therefore, no recommendations have been made for their use. A 67-year-old male physician with no significant medical history presented to the cardiology clinic complaining of shortness of breath that had been gradually worsening over a 2-week period and was found to have an anterior wall myocardial infarction with apical left ventricular thrombus that was treated with apixaban. We present a case of rapid resolution of left ventricular thrombus with the use of apixaban for anticoagulation. Although there are no guideline recommendations for this use, there have been case series and case reports that have shown safety and efficacy. Apixaban can be used for rapid resolution of left ventricular thrombus treatment.

scholarly journals A Case Series of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in Post-Infarction Left Ventricular Thrombus

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Tarique S. Chachar ◽  
Nooraldaem Yousif ◽  
Khurshid Ahmed ◽  
Tajammul Hussain ◽  
Haitham Amin
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Current Guidelines

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a known complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Vitamin K antagonists such as Warfarin showed a reduction in associated mortality and morbidity and are indicated as anticoagulants of choice in current guidelines. Since their approval for clinical use, there has been a dramatic increase in off-label use of direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) for LVT. In this case series, the authors share their successful experience with DOAC in the treatment of LVT.

scholarly journals The use of novel oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) in patients with left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A Jones ◽  
Paul Wright ◽  
Momin A Alizadeh ◽  
Sadeer Fhadil ◽  
Krishnaraj S Rathod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus

Abstract Aim Current guidelines recommend the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for up to 3–6 months for treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, based on evidence supporting non-inferiority of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared to VKA for other indications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation, NOACs are being increasingly used off licence for the treatment of LV thrombus post-AMI. In this study, we investigated the safety and effect of NOACs compared to VKA on LV thrombus resolution in patients presenting with AMI. Methods and results This was an observational study of 2328 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI between May 2015 and December 2018, at a UK cardiac centre. Patients’ details were collected from the hospital electronic database. The primary endpoint was rate of LV thrombus resolution with bleeding rates a secondary outcome. Left ventricular thrombus was diagnosed in 101 (4.3%) patients. Sixty patients (59.4%) were started on VKA and 41 patients (40.6%) on NOAC therapy (rivaroxaban: 58.5%, apixaban: 36.5%, and edoxaban: 5.0%). Both groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics including age, previous cardiac history (previous myocardial infarction, PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting), and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia). Over the follow-up period (median 2.2 years), overall rates of LV thrombus resolution were 86.1%. There was greater and earlier LV thrombus resolution in the NOAC group compared to patients treated with warfarin (82% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.0018, at 1 year), which persisted after adjusting for baseline variables (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.9). Major bleeding events during the follow-up period were lower in the NOAC group, compared with VKA group (0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.030) with no difference in rates of systemic thromboembolism (5% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.388). Conclusion These data suggest improved thrombus resolution in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) LV thrombosis in patients treated with NOACs compared to VKAs. This improvement in thrombus resolution was accompanied with a better safety profile for NOAC patients vs. VKA-treated patients. Thus, provides data to support a randomized trial to answer this question.

Incidence and Natural History of Left Ventricular Thrombus Following Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally C. Greaves ◽  
Guang Zhi ◽  
Richard T. Lee ◽  
Scott D. Solomon ◽  
Jean MacFadyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Anterior Wall ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonists (Warfarin) based on the triple therapy for left ventricular thrombus after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongfan Zhang ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Ming Qu ◽  
Miao Yu ◽  
Zhenya Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background: Left ventricular thrombus(LVT) can lead to serious complications, and mostly formed after ST-Elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI). The Off-label use of new oral anticoagulants(NOACs) in the triple therapy of LVT after STEMI has increased in the past few years. As one of the most widely used NOACs, the data of safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in LVT after STEMI is limited and warrants continued exploring.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving STEMI patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among patients who developed LVT after STEMI, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban plus DAPT therapy associated with thrombus resolution and clinical adverse events, compared with triple therapy with VKA. Results: In 1,335 patients with STEMI, a total of 77 (5.7%) developed LVT over the follow up period (median 25.0 months). Of the patients diagnosed with LVT, 31 patients were started on triple therapy with VKA, 33 patients on triple therapy with rivaroxaban. There was a consistent similarity in LVT resolution with rivaroxaban application compared to VKA application during the follow-up period[HR:1.57(95%CI 0.89-2.77), p=0.096; Adjusted HR:1.70(95%CI 0.90-3.22), p=0.104]. When the analysis focused on LVT resolution at different time points during the follow-up period, triple therapy with rivaroxaban showed quicker resolution than with VKA(6months:p=0.049; 12months:p=0.044; 18months:p=0.045). Meanwhile, similar risks of ISTH bleeding were recorded in both groups, with no difference between the two groups(Rivaroxaban 6.1% vs VKA 9.7% , p=0.444). Fewer net adverse clinical events(NACE) were observed in the rivaroxaban group compared with the VKA group[Rivaroxaban 24.2% vs VKA 58.1%; HR:0.31(95%CI 0.14-0.68), p=0.003; Adjusted HR: 0.23(95%CI 0.09-0.57), p=0.001].Conclusions: This observational study suggests triple therapy with rivaroxaban has similar and quicker LVT resolution in patients with LVT after STEMI, compared with triple therapy with VKA, and perhaps was accompanied with a better clinical benefit. Larger sample sizes and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this observation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document