scholarly journals Confusing the drug facts on one nonprescription drug label with those on another: The Drug Facts Label as a text schema

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 205510291664195
Author(s):  
Michael P Ryan ◽  
Reagan N Costello-White ◽  
Mercedes N Sandoval
2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (24) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
ALICIA AULT
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (08) ◽  
pp. 337-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payman Shahabi ◽  
Laura Scheinfeldt ◽  
Daniel Lynch ◽  
Tara Schmidlen ◽  
Sylvie Perreault ◽  
...  

SummaryPharmacogenomics (PGx) guided warfarin dosing, using a comprehensive dosing algorithm, is expected to improve dose optimisation and lower the risk of adverse drug reactions. As a complementary tool, a simple genotype-dosing table, such as in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Coumadin drug label, may be utilised for general risk assessment of likely over- or under-anticoagulation on a standard dose of warfarin. This tool may be used as part of the clinical decision support for the interpretation of genetic data, serving as a first step in the anticoagulation therapy decision making process. Here we used a publicly available warfarin dosing calculator (www.warfarindosing.org) to create an expanded gene-based warfarin dosing table, the CPMC-WD table that includes nine genetic variants in CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2. Using two datasets, a European American cohort (EUA, n=73) and the Quebec Warfarin Cohort (QWC, n=769), we show that the CPMC-WD table more accurately predicts therapeutic dose than the FDA table (51 % vs 33 %, respectively, in the EUA, McNemar’s two-sided p=0.02; 52 % vs 37 % in the QWC, p<1×10−6). It also outperforms both the standard of care 5 mg/day dosing (51 % vs 34 % in the EUA, p=0.04; 52 % vs 31 % in the QWC, p<1×10−6) as well as a clinical-only algorithm (51 % vs 38 % in the EUA, trend p=0.11; 52 % vs 45 % in the QWC, p=0.003). This table offers a valuable update to the PGx dosing guideline in the drug label.Supplementary Material to this article is available at www.thrombosis-online.com.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1343-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
LO Tommy Westerlund ◽  
Bertil RG Marklund ◽  
Wolfgang HA Handl ◽  
Margareta E Thunberg ◽  
Peter Allebeck

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spinel Karas ◽  
Federico Innocenti

Irinotecan is an anticancer agent widely used for the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Severe neutropenia and diarrhea are common dose-limiting toxicities of irinotecan-based therapy, and UGT1A1 polymorphisms are one of the major risk factors of these toxicities. In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration revised the drug label to indicate that patients with UGT1A1*28 homozygous genotype should receive a decreased dose of irinotecan. However, UGT1A1*28 testing is not routinely used in the clinic, and specific reasons include lack of access to concise information on this wide issue as well as mixed recommendations by regulatory and professional entities. To assist oncologists in assessing whether and when to use UGT1A1 genetic testing in patients receiving irinotecan-based therapies, this article provided (1) essential knowledge of UGT1A1 polymorphisms; (2) an update on the impact of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on efficacy and toxicity of contemporary irinotecan-based regimens; (3) dosing adjustments based upon the UGT1A1 genotypes, and (4) recommendations from currently available guidelines from the US and international scientific consortia and major oncology societies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Hesty Utami Ramadaniati ◽  
Heni Safarini ◽  
Aishah A Regine

Off-label is a term used in which a  drug prescribed outside the official information of the marketing authorization.  Off-label prescribing may occur as the result of several factors including  lack of clinical trials data involving pediatrics and suitable formulations for medicines commonly prescribed to this fragile population. Objective: This study aimed to estimate the nature and prevalence of off-label prescribing in pediatric inpatients with pneumonia. Material and Methods: a retrospective study was conducted in a study hospital using medical records from pediatric inpatients with pneumonia during the period of January-December 2015. Patient and prescribing data were collected, and drugs were classified as on-label or off-label based on the Indonesia National Drug Information (IONI) and British National Formulary for Children (BNFC). Thereafter, off-label drugs were categorized with a hierarchical system of age, indication, route of administration and dosage. Results: There were 1141 drugs with 77 different types of drug were administered to 207 patient during the study period. The data uncovered that 405 (35,5%) of the drug prescriptions were used off-label based on IONI, and 319 (28%) of the drug were used off-label based on BNFC. Based on IONI and BNFC, most off-label drugs were from anti infection drugs. Conclusion: The prevalence of off-label use in pediatric inpatients with pneumonia is not high. The off-label prescribing may not be necessarily  be considered irrational, yet this fact reveals that the use of drugs does not comply with the drug label. Clinical trials for pediatric drugs are essential to provide  complete product information for pediatric use.


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Steinmetz ◽  
Kim C. Coley ◽  
Bruce G. Pollock
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle E. Lener

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document